Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Colman, Andrew M.
1991.
Unreliable peer review: Causes and cures of human misery.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
141.
Mahoney, Michael J.
1991.
Justice, efficiency and epistemology in the peer review of scientific manuscripts.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
157.
Adams, Kenneth M.
1991.
Peer review: An unflattering picture.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
135.
Bailar, John C.
1991.
Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
137.
Wasserman, Gerald S.
1991.
Do peer reviewers really agree more on rejections than acceptances? A random-agreement benchmark says they do not.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
165.
Tyrer, Peter
1991.
Chairman's action: The importance of executive decisions in peer review.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
164.
Greene, Richard
1991.
Is there an alternative to peer review?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
149.
Lock, Stephen P.
1991.
Should the blinded lead the blinded?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
156.
Cohen, Patricia
1991.
Does group discussion contribute reliability of complex judgments?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
139.
Gilmore, J. Barnard
1991.
On forecasting validity and finessing reliability.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
148.
Rosenthal, Robert
1991.
Some indices of the reliability of peer review.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
160.
Cone, John D.
1991.
Evaluating scholarly works: How many reviewers? How much anonymity?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
142.
Kraemer, Helena Chmura
1991.
Do we really want more “reliable” reviewers?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
152.
Fletcher, Jack M.
1991.
Journal availability and the quality of published research.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
146.
Bornstein, Robert F.
1991.
The predictive validity of peer review: A neglected issue.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
138.
Cole, Stephen
1991.
Consensus and the reliability of peer-review evaluations.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
140.
Laming, Donald
1991.
Why is the reliability of peer review so low?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
154.
Zentall, Thomas R.
1991.
What to do about peer review: Is the cure worse than the disease?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
166.
Rourke, Byron P.
1991.
Toward openness and fairness in the review process.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
161.
Nelson, Linda D.
1991.
The process of peer review: Unanswered questions.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
158.