Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Lubinski, David
and
Humphreys, Lloyd G.
1990.
A broadly based analysis of mathematical giftedness.
Intelligence,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 3,
p.
327.
Lubinski, David
and
Humphreys, Lloyd G.
1992.
Some bodily and medical correlates of mathematical giftedness and commensurate levels of socioeconomic status.
Intelligence,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 1,
p.
99.
Feingold, Alan
1992.
Sex Differences in Variability in Intellectual Abilities: A New Look at an Old Controversy.
Review of Educational Research,
Vol. 62,
Issue. 1,
p.
61.
Hedges, Larry V.
and
Friedman, Lynn
1993.
Gender Differences in Variability in Intellectual Abilities: A Reanalysis of Feingold’s Results.
Review of Educational Research,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 1,
p.
94.
Thomas, Hoben
1993.
A theory explaining sex differences in high mathematical ability has been around for some time.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 1,
p.
187.
Witt, Elizabeth A.
Dunbar, Stephen B.
and
Hoover, H.D.
1994.
A Multivariate Perspective on Sex Differences in Achievement and Later Performance Among Adolescents.
Applied Measurement in Education,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 3,
p.
241.
Stumpf, Heinrich
and
Jackson, Douglas N.
1994.
Gender-related differences in cognitive abilities: Evidence from a medical school admissions testing program.
Personality and Individual Differences,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 3,
p.
335.
Stumpf, Heinrich
1995.
Gender differences in performance on tests of cognitive abilities: Experimental design issues and empirical results.
Learning and Individual Differences,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 4,
p.
275.
Stumpf, Heinrich
and
Eliot, John
1995.
Gender-related differences in spatial ability and the k factor of general spatial ability in a population of academically talented students.
Personality and Individual Differences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
33.
Stanley, Julian C.
and
Stumpf, Heinrich
1996.
Able youths and achievement tests.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
263.
Kornbrot, Diana Eugenie
1996.
Resources dimorphism sexual selection and mathematics achievement.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
259.
Humphreys, Lloyd G.
1996.
A critic with a different perspective.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
257.
Geary, David C.
1996.
Sexual selection and sex differences in mathematical abilities.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
229.
Dowker, Ann
1996.
How important is spatial ability to mathematics?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
251.
Proudfoot, Diane
1996.
The logic of the sociobiological model Geary-style.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
261.
Rowe, David C.
1996.
The twain shall meet: Uniting the analysis of sex differences and within-sex variation.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
262.
Foss, Jeffrey
1996.
Arithmetic and old lace.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
252.
Frith, Uta
and
Happé, Francesca
1996.
Mary has more: Sex differences, autism, coherence, and theory of mind.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
253.
Epstein, Herman T.
1996.
Omissions relevant to gender-linked mathematical abilities.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
251.
Wynn, Thomas
Tierson, Forrest
and
Palmer, Craig
1996.
Sex differences and evolutionary by-products.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
265.