Skip to main content Accessibility help

Eye movements are an important part of the story, but not the whole story

  • Kyle R. Cave (a1)


Some previous accounts of visual search have emphasized covert attention at the expense of eye movements, and others have focused on eye movements while ignoring covert attention. Both selection mechanisms are likely to contribute to many searches, and a full account of search will probably need to explain how the two interact to find visual targets.



Hide All
Bichot, N. P., Rossi, A. F. & Desimone, R. (2005) Parallel and serial neural mechanisms for visual search in macaque area V4. Science 308:529–34.
Cave, K. R. (2012) FIT: Foundation for an integrative theory. In: From perception to consciousness: Searching for Anne Treisman, ed. Wolfe, J. M. & Robertson, L., pp. 139–45. Oxford University Press.
Cave, K. R. & Zimmerman, J. M. (1997) Flexibility in spatial attention before and after practice. Psychological Science 8:399403.
Chen, Z. (1998) Switching attention within and between objects: The role of subjective organization. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 52:716.
Chen, Z. & Cave, K. R. (2013) Perceptual load vs. dilution: The role of attentional focus, stimulus category, and target predictability. Frontiers in Psychology 4:327, 114.
Chen, Z. & Cave, K. R. (2014) Constraints on dilution from a narrow attentional zoom reveal how spatial and color cues direct selection. Vision Research 101:125–37.
Chen, Z. & Cave, K. R. (2016) Zooming in on the cause of the perceptual load effect in the go/no-go paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 42(8):1072–87. Available at:
Deubel, H. & Schneider, W. X. (1996) Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research 36:1827–37.
Egly, R., Driver, J. & Rafal, R. D. (1994) Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 123:161–77. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.123.2.161.
Eriksen, C. W. & St. James, J. D. (1986) Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception and Psychophysics 40:225–40.
Goldsmith, M. & Yeari, M. (2003) Modulation of object-based attention by spatial focus under endogenous and exogenous orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18:2628.
Harms, L. & Bundesen, C. (1983) Color segregation and selective attention in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics 33:1119.
Hoffman, J. E. & Nelson, B. (1981) Spatial selectivity in visual search. Perception and Psychophysics 30:283–90.
Kim, M. S. & Cave, K. R. (1995) Spatial attention in visual search for features and feature conjunctions. Psychological Science 6:376–80.
Lavie, N. (2005) Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9:7582.
Mangun, G. R. & Hillyard, S. A. (1995) Mechanisms and models of selective attention. In: Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition, ed. Rugg, M. D. & Coles, M. G. H., pp. 4085. Oxford University Press.
Olivers, C. N. L., Meijer, F. & Theeuwes, J. (2006) Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: Visual working memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32:1243–65.
Rayner, K. & Fisher, D. L. (1987) Eye movements and the perceptual span during visual search. In: Eye movements: From physiology to cognition, ed. O'Regan, J. K. & Levy-Schoen, A., pp. 293302. Elsevier Science.
Sanders, A. F. (1970) Some aspects of the selective process in the functional visual field. Ergonomics 13:101–17. doi: 10.1080/00140137008931124.
Shomstein, S. S. & Yantis, S. (2002) Object-based attention: Sensory modulation or priority setting? Perception and Psychophysics 64(1):4151.
Treisman, A. & Gormican, S. (1988) Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review 95:1548.
Tsal, Y. & Benoni, H. (2010) Diluting the burden of load: Perceptual load effects are simply dilution effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 36:1645–56.
Wilson, D. E., Muroi, M. & MacLeod, C. M. (2011) Dilution, not load, affects distractor processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 37:319–35.
Woodman, G. F. & Luck, S. J. (1999) Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search. Nature 400:867–69. doi: 10.1038/23698.
Young, A. H. & Hulleman, J. (2013) Eye movements reveal how task difficulty moulds visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 39:168–90.


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed