Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Do shamans violate notions of humanness?

  • Nick Haslam (a1)

Abstract

Singh proposes that shamans violate notions of humanness in patterned ways that signal supernatural capacities. I argue that his account, based on a notion of humanness that contrasts humans with non-human animals, does not capture people's understandings of supernatural beings. Shamanic behavior may simply violate human norms in unstructured, improvised ways rather than contrast with a coherent concept of humanness.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Gray, H. M., Gray, K. & Wegner, D. M. (2007) Dimensions of mind perception. Science 315:10619. doi:10.1126/science.1134475.
Haslam, N., Kashima, Y., Loughnan, S., Shi, J. & Suitner, C. (2008) Subhuman, inhuman, and superhuman: Contrasting humans with nonhumans in three cultures. Social Cognition 26:248–58. doi:10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.248.
Ojamaa, T. (1997) The shaman as a zoomorphic human. Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore 4:7792.
Waytz, A., Hoffman, K. M. & Trawalter, S. (2015) A superhumanization bias in whites' perception of blacks. Social Psychological and Personality Science 6:352–59. doi:10.1177/1948550614553642.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed