No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Comparative cognitive studies, not folk phylogeny, please
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 February 2010
Abstract
Barresi & Moore (B&M) provide a useful tool for the comparative study of social cognition that could, however, be improved by more subtle analysis of first person information about intentional relations. Knowledge of misrepresentation also needs to be better handled within the theory. I urge skepticism about B&M's sweeping phylogenetic claims.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996