Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-lfgmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-29T09:20:15.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multiple perspectives on word production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1999

Willem J. M. Levelt
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6500 AH Nijmegen, The Netherlandspim@mpi.nlasmeyer@mpi.nl www.mpi.nl
Ardi Roelofs
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Washington Singer Laboratories, Exeter EX4 4QG, United Kingdoma.roelofs@exeter.ac.uk
Antje S. Meyer
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6500 AH Nijmegen, The Netherlandspim@mpi.nlasmeyer@mpi.nl www.mpi.nl

Abstract

The commentaries provide a multitude of perspectives on the theory of lexical access presented in our target article. We respond, on the one hand, to criticisms that concern the embeddings of our model in the larger theoretical frameworks of human performance and of a speaker's multiword sentence and discourse generation. These embeddings, we argue, are either already there or naturally forgeable. On the other hand, we reply to a host of theory-internal issues concerning the abstract properties of our feedforward spreading activation model, which functions without the usual cascading, feedback, and inhibitory connections. These issues also concern the concrete stratification in terms of lexical concepts, syntactic lemmas, and morphophonology. Our response stresses the parsimony of our modeling in the light of its substantial empirical coverage. We elaborate its usefulness for neuroimaging and aphasiology and suggest further cross-linguistic extensions of the model.

Type
Authors' Response
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)