Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T14:15:58.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imitation as a conjunction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2008

Cecilia Heyes
Cecilia Heyes
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University College London, London WC1 6BT, United Kingdom. c.heyes@ucl.ac.ukhttp://www.psychol.ucl.ac.uk/celia.heyes/netintro.htm
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The conjunctive conception takes imitation to be a combination of observational learning and copying. In the target article, and elsewhere, this conception generates problems in (1) explaining the copying of intransitive actions, (2) elucidating the potential functions of imitation, and (3) recognising when the correspondence problem has been avoided rather than solved. Hurley's careful use of subpersonal and personal levels of explanation shows us how to tackle these and other questions about imitation.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 28 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brass, M. & Heyes, C. M. (2005) Imitation: Is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9:489–95.Google Scholar
Catmur, C., Walsh, V. & Heyes, C. M. (2007) Sensorimotor learning configures the human mirror system. Current Biology 17:1527–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chartrand, T. & Bargh, J. (1999) The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76:893–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G. & Rizzolatti, G. (1995) Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology 73:2608–11.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. (2001) Causes and consequences of imitation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5:253–61.Google Scholar