No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Comments
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 February 2009
Extract
One of the dangers at any conference is that the commentator, rather than doing his assigned task, will deliver still another (and lengthy) paper. In inviting me, the organizers of the conference must have felt they had taken the ultimate precaution against this danger, for they invited a commentator who is no specialist in the history of the Austrian empire. There were, of course, to have been two papers at this session that, at least linguistically, would have provided me some more familiar ground, and I regret for reasons both personal and professional that Professors Valsecchi and Greenfield were unable to present their papers.1 I shall merely allude to the Italian case in putting forth some general propositions which were stimulated by the three papers I have seen—those of Professors Ľudovít Holotík, Stephen Fischer-Galati, and Ivan Rudnytsky.
- Type
- Comments
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Center for Austrian Studies, University of Minnesota 1967
References
1 The organizers of the conference are delighted that Professor Greenfield was subsequently able to write the article printed immediately after these comments.
2 Kramer, Hans, Österreich und das Risorgimento. In Österreich Reihe, No. 222–224 (Vienna: Bergland Verlag, 1963)Google Scholar, passim. See also his Die Italiener unter der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie In Wiener Historische Studien, No. 2 (Vienna: Herold Verlag, 1954), passim.Google Scholar
3 See Wolf, Eric R., “Cultural Dissonance in the Italian Alps,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. V (1962), pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Alix, Christine, Le Saint-Siège et les nationalisme en Europe (Paris: Sirey, 1962), pp. 50–121.Google Scholar