Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T06:28:22.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transition From Early Intervention to School: A Family Focussed View of the Issues Involved

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Robyn Bentley-Williams  and
Nancy Butterfield
Robyn Bentley-Williams*
Affiliation:
Charles Sturt University - Mitchell
Nancy Butterfield
Affiliation:
NSW Department of School Education
*
Address for correspondence: Robyn Bentley-Williams, Lecturer in Special Education, Charles Sturt University-Mitchell, Panorama Avenue, Bathurst NSW 2795.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper focuses on the concerns facing families of young children with disabilities as their child approaches transition to school. Three families were interviewed to gain insight into a) their feelings and concerns about their child’s transition to school, b) their understanding of the supports that currently exist and those that are needed to facilitate transition, and c) the influence of society on the development of the family’s values and attitudes which affect decisions about transition to school.

The results of the three interviews confirm earlier research findings which indicate the necessity to involve parents fully in the transition to school planning process. The anxiety and stress expressed by these families highlights the need for systematic planning, regular communication with families about the processes available to support them and the provision of opportunities to share information about their child with staff in the school setting.

By listening and reflecting on the feelings and concerns expressed by these three families, the complexity of the transition to school period is highlighted. Each family’s uniqueness needs to be respected. The perceptions they have developed about the situation, guide their beliefs and actions at this time. Such perceptions develop over time resulting from previous experiences, the influence of friends and family, and the attitudes and acceptance of members of the community.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , 1996 , pp. 17 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butterfield, N. (1994). Collaborative processes to address issues in the transition of young children with special needs, from early childhood settings to school. In Enhancing Practice with Families: Early Intervention on the Move. Proceedings of the second annual conference of the Early Intervention Association, Queensland Chapter, June.Google Scholar
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood, Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Carter, J.J., Atwater, J.B., Schwartz, I.S., & Miller, P.A. (1990). Application of ecobehavioral analysis to the study of transitions across early education settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 13 4, 298–315.Google Scholar
Conn-Powers, M.C., Ross-Allen, J., & Holburn, S. (1990). Transition of young children into the elementary education mainstream. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 9,4,91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, K.E., Spiegel-McGill, P., & Hanrahan, P. (1988). Planning for school transition: An ecological-developmental approach. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 12, 3,245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, S., Schwartz, I. & Atwater, J. (1991). Perspectives on the transition from preschool to kindergarten for children with disabilities and their families. Exceptional Children, 58, 136–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography principles in practice. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Hanline, M.F. (1988). Making the transition to preschool: Identification of parent needs. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 2, 2,98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, T.E., Chandler, L.K., Kerns, G.M., & Fowler, S.A. (1986). What are parents saying about family involvement in school transitions? A retrospective transition interview. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 11, 1, 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17, 2, 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NSW Department of School Education (1988). Policy for the enrolment of children with disabilities. Sydney: Special Education Directorate.Google Scholar
NSW Department of School Education (1993). Special education policy. Sydney: Special Education Directorate.Google Scholar
NSW Department of School Education (1994). Transition of children with special needs into school. Draft edition, Western Region.Google Scholar
Sainato, D.M., & Lyon, S.R. (1989). Promoting successful mainstreaming transitions for handicapped preschool children. Journal of Early Intervention, 13,4, 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, C.L., & Vincent, L.J. (1990). Criterion of the next environment and best practices: Mainstreaming and integration 10 years later. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10, 1, 78–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, L. (1994). Families and professionals collaborate together. In Families and Professionals Collaborate together for Children with special needs. Proceedings of the first National Australian Early Intervention Conference, Adelaide. March.Google Scholar
Vincent, L.I., Salisbury, C. Walter, G., Brown, P., Gruenwald, L.J., & Powers, M. (1980). Program evaluation and curriculum development in early childhood/special education: Criteria of the next environment. In Sailor, W., Wilcox, B., & Brown, L. (Eds.), Methods of instruction for severely handicapped students (pp. 303–328). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar