Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T23:17:16.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Reduction of Calling-Out Behaviour in a Grade One Class through the Implementation of Behaviour Management Procedures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Louise Tapiolas  and
Ian Presland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A program aimed at improving the quality and quantity of oral exchanges between teacher and pupils during oral language sessions was examined. The particular program devised and implemented focused on reducing pupil call-outs by means of a group contingency procedure where time spent on listening to a story being read was contingent on keeping below a particular call-out rate. The study involves the use of Grade Seven pupils as data gatherers and suggests that beneficial social ‘spin-offs’ resulted between the Grade Seven and Grade One pupils. The reduction in the rate of call-outs during both treatment phases was statistically significant. Reinforcement (i.e., story reading), either partial or maximum, was obtained 80% of the time.

Type
Articles
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , November 1979 , pp. 18 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bardon, J.I. “School Psychology and School Psychologists”. American Psychologist, 1968, 23, 187–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrish, H. H., Saunders, M. and Wolf, M. M. “Good Behavior Game: Effects of Individual Contingencies for Group Consequences on Disruptive Behaviour in a Classroom”. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1969, 2, 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowen, E. L. “Social and Community Interventions”, in Mussen, P. and Rosenzweig, M. (eds.). Annual Review of Psychology, 1973, 24, 423–472.Google Scholar
Cowen, E. L. and Lorion, R. P. “Changing Roles for the School Mental Health Professional”. Journal of School Psychology, 1976, 14, 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, S. H. and Tramontana, J. “Instructions and Group Versus Individual Reinforcement in Modifying Disruptive Group Behaviour”. Journal of Applied Behavior A nalysis, 1971, 4, 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medland, M. B. and Stachnik, T. J. “Good-Behaviour Game: a Replication and Systematic Analysis”. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1973, 4, 45–51.Google Scholar
Schmidt, G. W. and Ulrich, R. E. “Effects of Group Contingent Events Upon Classroom Noise”. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1969, 2, 171–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, J. D., Pohl, F., Presland, I. and Glynn, E. L. “A Behaviour Analysis Approach to Guidance” New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 1977, Vol. 12, No. 2, 17–28.Google Scholar
Zax, M. and Cowen, E. L. Abnormal Psychology: Changing Conceptions. (2nd ed.) New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976.Google Scholar