Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T11:31:46.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sharing Risk – An Economic Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2013

Andreas Kull
Andreas Kull*
Affiliation:
AXA Winterthur, P.O. Box 357, CH-8401 Winterthur, Switzerland, E-mail: andreas.kull@axa-winterthur.ch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We revisit the relative retention problem originally introduced by de Finetti using concepts recently developed in risk theory and quantitative risk management. Instead of using the Variance as a risk measure we consider the Expected Shortfall (Tail-Value-at-Risk) and include capital costs and take constraints on risk capital into account. Starting from a risk-based capital allocation, the paper presents an optimization scheme for sharing risk in a multi-risk class environment. Risk sharing takes place between two portfolios and the pricing of risktransfer reflects both portfolio structures. This allows us to shed more light on the question of how optimal risk sharing is characterized in a situation where risk transfer takes place between parties employing similar risk and performance measures. Recent developments in the regulatory domain (‘risk-based supervision’) pushing for common, insurance industry-wide risk measures underline the importance of this question. The paper includes a simple non-life insurance example illustrating optimal risk transfer in terms of retentions of common reinsurance structures.

Keywords

Sharing and pooling of riskreinsuranceoptimal retentionsrisk-based capitalcapital cost
Type
Research Article
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , November 2009 , pp. 591 - 613
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Acerbi, C. and Tasche, D. (2002) On the coherence of Expected Shortfall, Journal of Banking and Finance 26, 1487–1503.Google Scholar
[2] Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.M. and Heath, D. (1999) Coherent measures of risk, Mathematical Finance 9, 203–228.Google Scholar
[3] Bühlmann, H. (1970) Mathematical Methods in Risk Theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
[4] Centeno, M.L. (1985) On combining quota quota-share and excess of loss, ASTIN Bulletin 15, 49–63.Google Scholar
[5] Centeno, M.L. (1986) Measuring the effects of reinsurance by the adjustment coefficient, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 5, 169–182.Google Scholar
[6] Centeno, M.L. (1988) The expected utility applied to reinsurance, in: Risk, Decision and Rationality. Edited by Bertrand, R., Munier, D., Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
[7] Centeno, M.L. (2002) Measuring the effects of reinsurance by the adjustment coefficient in the Sparre Andersen Model, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 30, 37–49.Google Scholar
[8] Centeno, M.L. (2004) Retention and Reinsurance Programmes. Encyclopedia of Actuarial Science 3, 1443–1452, Wiley.Google Scholar
[9] Denault, M. (2001) Coherent allocation of risk capital, Journal of Risk 4, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] de Finetti, B. (1940) Il problema dei pieni, Giornale dell'Istituto Italiano degli Attuari 11, 1–88.Google Scholar
[11] Daykin, C., Pentikänen, T. and Pesonen, M. (1996) Practical risk theory for actuaries, Chapmen & Hall, New York.Google Scholar
[12] European Commission (2007) Framework Directive for Solvency II (draft), available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2007/com2007_0361en01.pdf Google Scholar
[13] Filipović, D. and Kupper, M. (2007) On the Group Level Swiss Solvency Test, Mitteilungen der Schweizer Aktuarvereinigung 1, 97–114.Google Scholar
[14] Kalkbrener, M. (2005) An Axiomatic Approach to Capital Allocation, Mathematical Finance 15, 425–437.Google Scholar
[15] Kaluszka, M. (2001) Optimal reinsurance under mean-variance premium principles, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 28, 61–67.Google Scholar
[16] Laeven, R. and Goovaerts, M. (2004) An optimization approach to the dynamic allocation of economic capital, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 35, 299–319.Google Scholar
[17] Mildenhall, S.J. (2004) A note on the Myers and Read capital allocation formula, North American Actuarial Journal 8, 32–44.Google Scholar
[18] Rockafellar, R.T. and Uryasev, S. (2002) Conditional Value-at-Risk for general loss distributions, Journal of Banking and Finance 26, 1443–1471.Google Scholar
[19] Schmitter, H. (2000) Setting optimal reinsurance retentions, SwissRe Publication.Google Scholar
[20] Schnieper, R. (2000) Portfolio Optimization, ASTIN Bulletin 30, 195–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21] Simon, C.P. and Blume, L.E. (1994) Mathematics for Economists, 448–465, W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
[22] Swiss Federal Office of Private Insurance (2004) White Paper of the Swiss Solvency Test.Google Scholar
[23] Vajda, S. (1962) Minimum variance reinsurance, ASTIN Bulletin 2, 257–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24] Tasche, D. (2000) Risk contributions and performance measurement, Working Paper, Technische Universität, München.Google Scholar
[25] Venter, G.G. (2004) Capital allocation survey with commentary, North American Actuarial Journal 8, 96–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26] Waters, H. (1979) Excess of loss reinsurance limits, Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 37–43.Google Scholar