Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-mhpxw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T07:08:19.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Viewpoint: Waking up in a digital dawn: are we there yet?1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Elisa Lanzi
Elisa Lanzi*
Affiliation:
Art Department, Smith College, Bell Hall, Northampton MA 01063
Get access

Abstract

A new state-of-the-art fine arts complex for our College will soon open and it includes an Imaging Center: a physical environment that will support activities related to the teaching and research use of images. A parallel building project is happening simultaneously: the development of digital content and tools to enable imaging across the campus. The bricks and mortar effort will soon result in a spectacular sunrise. As far as content and tools go, we’re still in the deepest dark before dawn, i.e. we’re not there yet. As one faculty member put it, ‘That’s nice, but now what I really need …’. These few words speak volumes about user expectations and the extraordinary effort it takes to meet them.

Type
Research Article
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , 2002 , pp. 3 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. This article began as a talk presented at the IFLA 2001 annual conference, ARLIS/NA New England Satellite meeting in Boston, 17 August 2001.Google Scholar
2. Google Advanced Search (http://www.google.com/advanced_search)Google Scholar
3. Library of Congress (http://catalog.loc.gov/)Google Scholar
4. VRA Core Categories, version 3.0 (http://www.vraweb.org/vracore3.htm)Google Scholar
5. Dublin Core (http://dublincore.org)Google Scholar
6. CI DOC Conceptual Reference Model (http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/crm_intro.html)Google Scholar
7. Art Museum Image Consortium (AMICO) (http://www.amico.org)Google Scholar
8. Visual Arts Data Service (VADS) (http://vads.ahds.ac.uk/index.html)Google Scholar
9. Mellon, Andrew W. Foundation, ArtSTOR Initiative (http://www.mellon.org/artstor%2Oannouncement.html)Google Scholar
10. Digital Library Federation (http://www.diglib.org/dlfhomepage.htm)Google Scholar
11. Northeast Document Conservation Center (NEDCC). School for scanning: creating, managing, and preserving digital assets, held at Delray Beach, Florida, December 3-5 2001 (http://www.nedcc.org)Google Scholar
12. Dr.Hastings, Samantha K. ‘What are Digital Image Managers’. Spectra Fall 2000 vol. 26 no. 2, p. 18–22. (http://www.mcn.edu/spectra.htm)Google Scholar
13. Pisciotta, Henry et al. ‘Penn State Visual Image User Study’. D-Lib Magazine July/August 2001 vol. 7 no. 7/8 (http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july01/pisciotta/07pisciotta.html)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. RLG Cultural Materials Initiative (http://www.rlg.org/culturalres)Google Scholar
15. Madison, James University Digital Image Database (DID) (http://cit.jmu.edu/didinfo/assessment.shtml)Google Scholar
16. Getty, Art and architecture thesaurus, (http://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabulary/aat/index.html)Google Scholar
17. Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets)Google Scholar
18. Williams, Susan Jane. ‘Building sustainable digital collections - a visual resources collection perspective’. Art libraries journal 2001 vol. 26 no. 4, p.5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar