Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T15:33:06.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Access to art collections using Encoded Archival Description and beyond: the future of large-scale consortium projects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Richard Rinehart
Richard Rinehart*
Affiliation:
Berkeley Art Museum/Pacific Film Archive Faculty, Department of Art Practice, University of California, Berkeley, 2625 Durant Avenue, Berkeley, California, 94709, USA
*
Email: rinehart@uclink.berkeley.edu
Get access

Extract

In a Herculean effort to distribute information about art collections on a previously unknown scale, museums, arts organizations, libraries, and archives have been hard at work developing standards and implementing testbed projects, large-scale union databases which integrate and disseminate information. Two such projects are ‘Conceptual and Intermedia Online’ (CIAO) and ‘Museums and the Online Archive of California’ (MOAC), both using the Encoded Archival Description to describe and provide access to art and other cultural collections. But what is the future of such collaborations and the content portals they spawn? Will they be able to scale up to include hundreds or thousands of institutions, using current models? What are the limitations for such consortia? What are the limitations for participating institutions? Several options appear on the horizon, and one simple need suggests looking to decentralization, and back to the individual institution, for the solution to sharing art and cultural content on a truly vast scale.

Type
Research Article
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , 2001 , pp. 33 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. EAD is available online at http://www.loc.gov/ead Google Scholar
2. The NEA is a United States federal funding agency.Google Scholar
3. CIAO is available online at http://www.bampfa.berkeley.edu/ciao Google Scholar
4. MOAC is available online at http://www.bampfa.berkeley.edu/moac Google Scholar
5. OAC is available online at http://www.oac.cdlib.org Google Scholar
6. Cha Collection http://www.oac.cdlib.org:80/dynaweb/ead/moac/cha/@Generic—BookView;cs=default;ts=default Google Scholar
7. SMIL is available online at http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo Google Scholar
8. AMICO is available online at www.amico.org Google Scholar
9. CIMI, Dublin Core Project, http://www.cimi. org/public_docs/meta_final_proj_desc.html Google Scholar
10. RLG, Cultural Materials Initiative, http://www.rlg.org/culturalres/index.html Google Scholar
11. ‘Produce, publish and preserve: a holistic approach to digital assets management’, http://www.barnpfa.berkeley.edu/rnoac/imaging/index.html Google Scholar
12. Art Libraries Society of North America, http://www.arlisna.org Google Scholar
Art Libraries Society/UK and Ireland, http://www.arlis.org.uk Google Scholar
13. Museum Computer Network is available online at http://www.mcn.edu Google Scholar
14. Society of American Archivists is available online at http://www.archivists.org Google Scholar
15. American Libraries Association is available online at http://www.ala.org Google Scholar
16. American Association of Museums is available online at http://www.aam-us.org Google Scholar
17. MDA is available online at http://www.mda.org.uk Google Scholar
18. Getty’s ‘Introduction to Metadata’, Crosswalks chapter, http://www.getty.edu/research/institute/standards/intrometadata/3_crosswalks Google Scholar
19. NINCH’s ‘Guide to good practice in network ing cultural heritage’, http://www.ninch.org/PROJECTS/practice Google Scholar