Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T04:53:08.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Schindler, Symmetry and the Free Public Library, 1920

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Jin-Ho Park
Jin-Ho Park
Affiliation:
Department of Architecture and Urban DesignUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesCA 90095, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Schindler's Free Public Library competition project of 1920 is analysed. Archival documents are interpreted and an analytic model is constructed. Schindler's standing as a Modernist is considered and his early career is rehearsed, especially his involvement with Frank Lloyd Wright. The formal analysis focuses on the use of symmetry. An interpretation of Schindler's employment of the diagonal axis in the Library is proffered. Historical precedents for diagonal butterfly symmetry in the English free school and the Arts and Crafts movement are examined. A method of analysis using the partial ordering of subsymmetries of the square is applied to the floor plans In conclusion, the influence of the Library project on Schindler's later work is surveyed.

Type
theory
Information
arq: Architectural Research Quarterly , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , Winter 1996 , pp. 72 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baglivo, J. A., Graver, J. E. (1976). Incidence and Symmetry in Design and Architecture, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Baillie Scott, M. H. (1906). Houses and Gardens, George Newnes, London.Google Scholar
Banham, R. (1980). Theory and Design in the First Machine Age, The MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bucknall, B. (1889). Trs. Viollet-le-Duc: Discourses on Architecture, Ticknor, Boston.Google Scholar
Dannatt, T. (1960). Architect's Yearbook 9, Paul Elek, London.Google Scholar
Frampton, K. (1980). Modem Architecture, Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Gebhard, D. (1967). Schindler Architect, Haagen Printing and Offset, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Gebhard, D. (1971). Schindler, Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Gebhard, D. ed. (1993). The Architectural Drawings of R. M. Schindler, in four volumes, Garland Publishing, INC, New York & London.Google Scholar
Giella, B. (1985). R. M. Schindler's Thirties Style: Its Character (1931–1937) and International Source (1906–1937), PhD Thesis, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
Giella, B. (1994). ‘Buena Shore Club’ in March and Sheine (1994), pp. 38–47.Google Scholar
Grossman, I., Magnus, W. (1964). Groups and Their Graphs, Random House, Inc, New York.Google Scholar
Hawkes, D. (1988). Modem Country Homes in England: The Arts and Crafts Architecture in England, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, H.-R. (1940). ‘An Eastern Critic Looks at Western Architecture’, California Arts and Architecture, Vol. 57, pp. 221–223.Google Scholar
Israel, F. D. (1992). Franklin, D.Israel: Buildings and Projects, Rizzoli International Publications, New York.Google Scholar
Johnson, L. N. (1995). Frank Lloyd Wright: The Phoenix Papers, Vol. II: The Natural Pattern of Structure, University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Kornwol, J. D. (1972). Baillie, M. H.Scott and the Arts and Crafts Movement, The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore and London.Google Scholar
Kulka, H. (1960). ‘Adolf Loos, 1870–1933’ in Trevor Dannatt (1960, pp. 7–21).Google Scholar
Levine, N. (1982). ‘Frank Lloyd Wright's Diagonal Planning’. In Search of Modem Architecture, Helen, Searing ed., The Architectural History Foundation and The MIT Press, New York and Cambridge.Google Scholar
Noever, P. (1995). MAK Center for Art and Architecture: Schindler, R.M., Prestel Verlag, Munich.Google Scholar
March, L. (1994). ‘Dr How's Magical Music Box’ in March and Sheine (1994, pp.124–145).Google Scholar
March, L. (1995). ‘Sources of Characteristic Spatial Relations in Frank Lloyd Wright's Decorative Designs’ in Johnson (1995, pp.12–49).Google Scholar
March, L. (1997 forthcoming). Architectonics of Humanism, Academy Editions, London.Google Scholar
March, L., Sheine, J. (1994) eds. Schindler, R. M.: Composition and Construction, Academy Editions, London.Google Scholar
March, L., Steadman, P. (1971). The Geometry of Environment, RIBA Publications limited, London.Google Scholar
McCoy, E. (1960). Five California Architects, Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
McCoy, E. (1979). Vienna to Los Angeles, Two Journeys, Art + Architecture Press, Santa Monica.Google Scholar
Park, J.-H. (1995). A Formal Analysis of R. M. Schindler's Free Public Library, MA Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, B. B. (1985). Frank Lloyd Wright Monograph 1914–1923, A. D. A. Edits, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Sarnitz, A. (1988). R. M. Schindler Architect (1887–1953), Rizzoli International, New York.Google Scholar
Sarnitz, A. (1994). ‘The Wagnerschule and Adolf Loos’ in 03, Sheine (1994, pp. 20–37).Google Scholar
Schindler, R. M. (1934). ‘Space Architecture’, Dune Forum, 02 pp. 44–46.Google Scholar
Schindler, R. M. (1946). ‘Reference Frames in Space’, Architect and Engineer vol. 165, pp. 10, 40, 44–45.Google Scholar
Schindler, R. M. (1947). ‘The Schindler Frame’, Architectural Record, vol. 101, pp. 143–146.Google Scholar
Sheine, J. (1994). ‘Construction and the Schindler Frame’ in March and Sheine (1994, pp. 228–251).Google Scholar
Smith, K. (1987). R. M. Schindler Houses (1921–1922), Perpetua Press, West Hollywood.Google Scholar
Smith, K. (1992). Hollyhock House and Olive Hill, Rizzoli International, New York.Google Scholar
Sweeney, R. (1989). A Real California Scheme, GA Houses 26, A.D.A. Edita, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. St. J.. (1995). The Other Tradition of Modern Architecture: the Uncompleted Project, Academy Editions, London.Google Scholar
Wright, F. L. (1910). Ausgeführte Bauten und Entwürfe von Frank Lloyd Wright, Ernst Wasmuth, Berlin.Google Scholar