Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T17:01:57.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interactive computer rendering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Paul Richens  and
Simon Schofield
Paul Richens
Affiliation:
The Martin Centre for Architectural and Urban StudiesUniversity of CambridgeDepartment of Architecture6 Chaucer RoadCambridge CB2 2EBUnited Kingdom
Simon Schofield
Affiliation:
The Martin Centre for Architectural and Urban StudiesUniversity of CambridgeDepartment of Architecture6 Chaucer RoadCambridge CB2 2EBUnited Kingdom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interactive rendering combines the geometrical precision of classical computer graphics with the representational freedom of a paint program. It is more sympathetic to the ways in which designers use images, and overcomes many of the frustrations experienced in rendering from CAD models. The scene is generated in a standard viewing application, but saved as a specially enhanced raster image. The extra information allows the interactive renderer to apply brushed-on rendering effects which are sensitive to the perspective of the image. Effects can be applied locally or overall, and may be overlaid, blended and erased to create complex combinations. A huge range of treatments is obtainable, both photorealistic and not.

Type
It
Information
arq: Architectural Research Quarterly , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , Autumn 1995 , pp. 82 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakergem, W. D. van and Obata, G. (1992). Free-hand plotting - Is it live or is it digital? In (ed) Schmitt, G. N., CAAD Futures '91. Vieweg, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Foley, J. D, van Dam, A. et al. (1990). Computer Graphics Principles and Practice, 2nd ed., Addison Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Glazzard, N. (1993). The KATI Renderer (software). 5D Inc, London.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. (1960). Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. Phaidon, London.Google Scholar
Haeberti, P. (1990). Painting by numbers: abstract image representation, Computer Graphics, vol. 24, no. 4, ACM SIGGRAPH, pp. 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeberli, P. and Hanrahan, P. (1990). Direct WYSIWYG painting and texturing of 3-D shapes, Computer Graphics, vol. 24, no. 4, ACM SIGGRAPH, pp. 215–224.Google Scholar
Knoll, T. et al. (1993). Photoshop (software). Adobe Systems Inc., Mount View, California.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. T. (1993). The Reconfigured Eye. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Perlin, K. (1985). An image synthesiser, Computer Graphics, vol. 19, no. 3, ACM SIGGRAPH, pp 287–296.Google Scholar
Richens, P. (1994). Does knowledge really help? In (eds) Carrara, G and Kalay, Y E, Knowledge-Based Computer-Aided Design, pp. 305–325. Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
Saito, T. and Takahashi, T. (1990). Comprehensible rendering of 3-D shapes, Computer Graphics, vol. 24, no. 4, ACM SIGGRAPH, pp. 197–206.Google Scholar
Lansdown, J. and Schofield, S. (1995). Expressive rendering: an assessment and review of non-photorealistic techniques, Computer Graphics and Applications Vol 15, (3), IEEE, pp 29–37.Google Scholar
Winkenbach, G. and Salesin, D. H. (1994). Computer generated pen-and-ink illustration. In Computer Graphics, Proceedings, Annual Conference Series,1994.ACM SIGGRAPH, pp.91–100.Google Scholar
Zimmer, M. and Hedges, T. (1991). Fractal Design Painter (software). Fractal Design Corporation, Aptos, California.Google Scholar