Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T10:05:40.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Defining a relevant architecture in South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Paul Sanders
Paul Sanders
Affiliation:
School of Architecture, Planning and HousingUniversity of NatalDurban 4041, South Africa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Architecture in South Africa is at a crossroads. After years of repression and isolation during which contemporary architecture lost its way, there is now a desperate need for architects to respond to the social and cultural challenges of a society riven by massive material contrasts. Within architecture schools, a student body more representative of society than hitherto is engaged in projects which reflect the very diverse needs of the community. Central to the effectiveness of such teaching programmes is the presence of teachers fully engaged in practice, creating a responsible architecture for a renewed nation.

Type
Document
Information
arq: Architectural Research Quarterly , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 2000 , pp. 67 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buchanan, p. (1995) ‘Keeping a Good House’, The Architectural Review, March, Vol. 1177, pp.79–81.Google Scholar
Biermann, B. (1985) UIA: International Architect, Issue 8, p.46 and p.61.Google Scholar
Cooke, J. (1985) UIA: International Architect, Issue 8, p.61.Google Scholar
Competition, Report (1998) ‘A New Symbol for a New Democracy’, SA Architect, 08, pp.27–28.Google Scholar
Chipkin, C. (1993) Johannesburg Style: Architecture & Society 1880s–1960s, David Philip Publishers, Cape Town.Google Scholar
Forjaz, J. (1991) ‘Some Thoughts on Contrasts’, Architecture SA, 05/06, pp.23–24.Google Scholar
Harber, R. (1998) ‘Other Paradigms’, KZ-NlA Journal 1, p.1.Google Scholar
Harber, R. (1994a). ‘The Bare Sideplate’, Architecture SA, 03/04, p.11.Google Scholar
Harber, R. (1994b). ‘Outreach’, Natal Institute of Architects'Journal 2, p.7.Google Scholar
Hallen, H. (1985) ‘Keeping the Faith’, UIA: International Architect, Issue 8, p.4.Google Scholar
Herwitz, D. (1999) ‘Modernism at the margins’, in Blank_Architecture, apartheid and after, pp.404–421, NAI Publishers, Rotterdam & David Philip Publishers, Cape Town.Google Scholar
Japha, V. & D., (1998) ‘A New Court for a New Constitution’, SA Architect, 08, p.26.Google Scholar
Lipman, A. (1998) ‘Cash & Carry History Store’, SA Architect, 06, pp.18–21.Google Scholar
Marschall, S. (1998) ‘Finding a relevant Architecture’, SA Architect, 05, pp.38–43.Google Scholar
Marschall, S. (1998) ‘Nothing Wrong With Scrap: Recycled Materials in Contemporary Architecture’, KZ-NIA Journal 1, pp.2–3.Google Scholar
Nutall, J.C. (1993) ‘Conversation between Roelof Uytenbogaardt and Jean Carey Nutall’, TlA Journal 06, 11, pp.12–16.Google Scholar
Noero, J. ‘The Certainty of Context’, TIA Journal 03, pp.2–5.Google Scholar
Papini, R. (1994) ‘Shembe’, ADA Magazine ‘Durhan & Surrounds’, 1994, pp.105–107, Publisher & Editor-Jennifer Sorrell, Cape Town.Google Scholar
Radebe, J. ‘Closing Address’, SA Architect, 03, pp.36–37.Google Scholar
Sachs, A. (1998) ‘Judge & Jury’, SA Architect, 08, pp.27–29.Google Scholar
Seneque, M. (1998) ‘Creating a Learning Culture: preparing our graduates to work with diversity and complexity’, KZ-NIA Journal 1, pp.6–7.Google Scholar
Reitz, F. (1998) Design Thesis, University of Natal, unpublished.Google Scholar
Van Zyl, D. (1997) ‘Crop of 1996’, Architecture SA, 01/02, p.15.Google Scholar