Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T15:10:54.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Signs of identity, signs of memory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2008

Craig N. Cipolla
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay explores everyday practices as sites of memory-making, arguing that such practices have the potential to serve as markers and makers of cultural identity. I use frameworks of social memory to interpret 19th-century butchery practices on the Eastern Pequot reservation in North Stonington, Connecticut. Colonialism meant change for Pequot peoples, including shifts in family structures and the adoption of mass produced material culture. I argue that, within these abrupt changes, social memory and memory-making practices played a central role in maintaining and congealing indigenous identity. I examine evidence of changing butchery practices on the reservation as they related to the adoption of metal tools. Archaeological investigations demonstrate that even though the Eastern Pequot increasingly used metal tools for butchery, they also continued to use chipped tools made of either stone or glass. I suggest that this pattern is significant because of the ‘mnemonic’ qualities that chipped-tool usage might have carried on reservation grounds. These mnemonic practices served as binding ties for the reservation community.

Keywords

memoryidentitypracticepragmaticscolonialism
Type
Notes
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , December 2008 , pp. 196 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basso, K.H., 1996: Wisdom sits in places. Landscapes and language among the Western Apache, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R., 1978: Nunamuit ethnoarchaeology, New York.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R., 1981: Bones. Ancient men and modern myths, New York.Google Scholar
Boric, D., 2003: ‘Deep time’ metaphor. Mnemonic and apotropaic practices at Lepenski Vir, Journal of social archaeology 3, 46–74.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., 1977: Outline of a theory of practice (tr. Nice, R.), Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bragdon, K.J., and Simmons, W.S., 1998: Eastern Pequot Indians of Connecticut. Petition for federal acknowledgement as an American Indian tribe. Report submitted to the Branch of Acknowledgement and Research, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of Interior, Washington, D.C. (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
Carsten, J., 2007: Introduction. Ghosts of memory, in Carsten, J. (ed.), Ghosts of memory. Essays on remembrance and relatedness, Malden and Oxford, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casella, E.C., and Fowler, C., 2005: Beyond identification. An introduction, in Casella, E.C. and Fowler, C. (eds), The archaeology of plural and changing identities. Beyond identification, New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London and Moscow, 1–7.Google Scholar
Cave, A.A., 1996: The Pequot War, Amherst.Google Scholar
Cipolla, C.N., 2005: ‘Negotiating boundaries of colonialism. Nineteenth-century lifeways on the Eastern Pequot Reservation, North Stonington, Connecticut’, MA thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston.Google Scholar
Cipolla, C.N., Silliman, S.W. and Landon, D.B., in review: ‘Making do’. Nineteenth-century subsistence practices on the Eastern Pequot Reservation, Northeast anthropology.Google Scholar
Connerton, P., 2006: Cultural memory, in Tilley, C., Keane, W., Küchler, S., Rowlands, M. and Speyer, P. (eds), Handbook of material culture, London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi, 315–24.Google Scholar
Daniel, E.V., 1984: Fluid signs. Being a person the Tamil way, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeForest, J.W., 1964: History of the Indians of Connecticut. From the earliest known period to 1850, Archon Books.Google Scholar
Den Ouden, A., 2005: Beyond conquest. Native peoples, reservation land, and the struggle for history, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E., 2001 (1912): The elemetary forms of religious life (tr. Cosman, C.), London and New York.Google Scholar
Eckardt, H., and Williams, H., 2003: Objects without a past?, in Williams, H. (ed.), Archaeologies of remembrance, New York, 141–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fentress, J., and Wickam, C., 1992: Social memory, Malden and Oxford.Google Scholar
Forty, A., 2001: Introduction, in Forty, A. and Küchler, S. (eds), The art of forgetting, Oxford and New York, 1–18.Google Scholar
Forty, A., and Küchler, S. (eds), 2001: The art of forgetting, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Foucault, M., 1980: Power/knowledge. Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (tr. and ed. Gordon), C., New York.Google Scholar
Fowler, B., 2007: The obituary as collective memory, New York and London.Google Scholar
Gedi, N., and Elam, Y., 1996: Collective memory. What is it? History and memory 8, 30–50.Google Scholar
Gell, A., 1998: Art and agency. An anthropological theory, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, H.J., 1999: The origins of metallurgy. Distinguishing stone from metal cut-marks on bone from archaeological sites. Journal of archaeological science 26, 797–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halbwachs, M., 1992 (1941): On collective memory (ed. and tr. Coser, L.A.), Chicago and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M., 2001: Social archaeology and the theatres of memory, Journal of social archaeology 1, 50–61.Google Scholar
Hall, M., 2006: Identity, memory and countermemory. The archaeology of an urban landscape, Journal of material culture 11, 189–209.Google Scholar
Hallam, E., and Hockey, J., 2001: Death, memory and material culture, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Hauptman, L.M., 1990: The Pequot War and its legacies, in Hauptman, L.M. and Wherry, J.D. (eds), The Pequots in southern New England. The fall and rise of an American Indian nation, Norman and London, 69–81.Google Scholar
Herskovits, M.J., 1938: Acculturation. The study of culture contact, New York.Google Scholar
Holtorf, C., and Williams, H., 2006: Landscapes and memory, in Hicks, D. and Beaudry, M.C. (eds), The Cambridge companion to historical archaeology, Cambridge, 235–54.Google Scholar
Jones, A., 2007: Memory and material culture, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jones, S., 1996: The archaeology of ethnicity. Constructing identities in the past and present, London and New York.Google Scholar
Jones, S., 2007: Discourses of identity in the interpretation of the past, in Insoll, Tim (ed.), The archaeology of identities, London and New York, 44–58.Google Scholar
Joyce, R.A., 2003: Concrete memories. Fragments of the past in the classic Maya present (500–100 AD), in Van Dyke, R.M. and Alcock, S.E. (eds), Archaeologies of memory, Malden and Oxford, 104–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, W., 2003: Semiotics and the social analysis of material things, Language and communication 23, 409–25.Google Scholar
Klippel, W.E., 2001: Sugar monoculture, bovid skeletal part frequencies, and stable carbon isotopes. Interpreting enslaved African diet at Brimstone Hill, St Kitts, West Indies, Journal of archaeological science 28, 1191–98.Google Scholar
Knappett, C., 2005: Thinking through material culture. An interdisciplinary perspective, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Kopytoff, I., 1986: The cultural biography of things. Commoditization as process, in Appadurai, A. (ed.), The social life of things. Commodities in cultural perspective, Cambridge, 64–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, H., 1991: The production of space (tr. D. Nicholson-Smith, ), Malden and Oxford.Google Scholar
Lillios, K.T., 1999: Objects of memory. The ethnography and archaeology of heirlooms, Journal of archaeological method and theory 6, 235–62.Google Scholar
Linde, C., 2000: The acquisition of a speaker by a story. How history becomes memory and identity, Ethos 28, 608–32.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, D., 2001: Preface, in Forty, A. and Küchler, S. (eds), The art of forgetting, Oxford and New York, xi–xiii.Google Scholar
Lucas, G., 1997: Forgetting the past, Anthropology today 13, 8–14.Google Scholar
McBride, K.A., 1990: The historical archaeology of the Mashantucket Pequots, 1637–1900. A preliminary analysis, in Hauptman, L.M. and Wherry, J.D. (eds), The Pequots in southern New England. The fall and rise of an American Indian nation, Norman and London, 96–117.Google Scholar
Newell, M.E., 2003: The changing nature of Indian slavery in New England, 1670–1720, in Calloway, C.G. and Salisbury, N. (eds), Reinterpreting New England Indians and the colonial experience, Boston, 106–37.Google Scholar
O'Hanlon, M., and Frankland, L., 2003: Co-present landscapes. Routes and rootedness as sources of identity in highlands New Guinea, in Stewart, P.J. and Strathern, A. (eds), Landscapes, memory and history. Anthropological perspectives, London and Sterling, 166–87.Google Scholar
Pauketat, T.R., and Alt, S.M., 2003: Mounds, memory, and contested Mississippian history, in Van Dyke, R.M. and Alcock, S.E. (eds), Archaeologies of memory, Malden and Oxford, 151–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C.S., 1998a (1903): Nomenclature and divisions of triadic relations, as far as they are determined, in the Peirce Edition Project, (eds), The essential Peirce. Selected philosophical writings, volume 2 (1893–1913), Bloomington and Indianapolis, 289–99.Google Scholar
Peirce, C.S., 1998b (1895): Of reasoning in general, in the Peirce Edition Project, (eds), The essential Peirce. Selected philosophical writings, volume 2 (1893–1913), Bloomington and Indianapolis, 11–26.Google Scholar
Peirce, C.S., 1998c (1903): Sundry logical conceptions, in the Peirce Edition Project, (eds), The essential Peirce. Selected philosophical writings, volume 2 (1893–1913), Bloomington and Indianapolis, 267–88.Google Scholar
Preucel, R.W., 2006: Archaeological semiotics, Malden and Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preucel, R.W., and Bauer, A.A., 2001: Archaeological pragmatics, Norwegian archaeological review 34, 85–96.Google Scholar
Prince, J.D., and Speck, F.G., 1904: Glossary of the Mohegan-Pequot language, American anthropologist 6, 18–45.Google Scholar
Rowlands, M., and Tilley, C., 2006: Monuments and memorials, in Tilley, C., Keane, W., Küchler, S., Rowlands, M. and Speyer, P. (eds), Handbook of material culture, London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi, 500–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B., 1982: The social context of commemoration. A study of collective memory, Social forces 61, 374–97.Google Scholar
Silliman, S.W., 2001: Agency, practical politics and the archaeology of culture contact, Journal of social archaeology 1, 190–209.Google Scholar
Silliman, S.W., 2005: Culture contact or colonialism? Challenges in the archaeology of Native North America, American antiquity 70, 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarlow, S., 1999: Bereavement and commemoration. An archaeology of mortality, Malden and Oxford.Google Scholar
Voss, B., 2008: The archaeology of ethnogenesis. Race and sexuality in colonial San Francisco, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, P.L., and Long, J.C., 1977: An experimental study of morphological characteristics of tool marks, American antiquity 42, 605–16.Google Scholar
Williams, H. (ed.), 2003: Archaeologies of remembrance. Death and memory in past societies, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, H., 2005: Keeping the dead at arm's length. Memory, weaponry and early medieval mortuary technologies, Journal of social archaeology 5, 253–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, H., 2006: Death and memory in early medieval Britain, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar