Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
EnglishFrançais
Archaeological Dialogues Archaeological Dialogues

Article contents

Grounding arguments about burials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Stephen Shennan
Get access
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Extract

Lohof's paper represents an interesting and important attempt to analyse and interpret Late Neolithic and earlier Bronze Age burial practices in the Netherlands. His suggestions are of wide relevance, not least because the phenomena he discusses were widely distributed over much of Europe. In what follows I wish to raise a number of issues which I think need clarifying, in order to elicit his response.

Type
Discussion
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , August 1994 , pp. 124 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.
If you should have access and can't see this content please contact technical support.

References

Alexander, J., and Ozanne, A., 1960: Report on the investigation of a round barrow on Arreton Down, Isle of Wight, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 26, 263–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashbee, P., 1985: The excavation of Amesbury barrows 58, 61a, 61 and 72, Wiltshire archaeological magazine 79, 39–91.Google Scholar
Bakker, J.A., 1983: Het Hunebed G1 te Noordlaren, Groningse volksalmanak 1982–1983, 115–199 (Groninger oudheden 16).Google Scholar
Bakker, J.A., 1992: The Dutch Hunebedden, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Barrett, J.C., 1990: The monumentality of death: the character of Early Bronze Age mortuary mounds in southern Britain, World archaeology 22, 179–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J.C., 1991: Towards an archaeology of ritual, in Garwood, P., Jennings, D., Skeates, R. and Toms, J. (eds), Sacred and profane: the archaeology of ritual and religion, Oxford, 1–9.Google Scholar
Barrett, J.C., 1994: Fragments from antiquity. An archaeology of social life in Britain, 2900–1200 BC., Oxford.Google Scholar
Barth, F., 1987: Cosmologies in the making: a generative approach to cultural variation in inner New Guinea, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, J., 1970: Die ältere Bronzezeit Nordwest-Deutschlands, Marburg (Kasseler Beiträge zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte 2).Google Scholar
Blanchet, J.C., 1984: Les premiers métallurgistes en Picardie et dans le nord de la France, Paris.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., 1977: Outline of a theory of practice, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P., 1990: The logic of practice, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Burgess, C., and Shennan, S., 1976: The Beaker phenomenon: some suggestions, in Burgess, C. and Miket, R.(eds), Settlement and economy in the second and third millennia BC, Oxford, 309–331.Google Scholar
Butler, J.J., 1986: Drouwen: end of a ‘nordic’ rainbow?, Palaeohistoria 28, 133–168.Google Scholar
Butler, J.J., 1990: Bronze age metal and amber in the Netherlands I, Palaeohistoria 32, 47–110.Google Scholar
Butler, J.J., and van der Waals, J.D., 1966 (1967): Bell beakers and early metal-working in the Netherlands, Palaeohistoria 12, 41–139.Google Scholar
Cannon, A., 1989: The historical dimension in mortuary expressions of status and sentiment, Current anthropology 30, 437–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, H., 1952: The excavation of two round barrows at Poole, Dorset, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 18, 148–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clare, T., 1986: Towards a reappraisal of henge monuments, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 52, 281–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clare, T., 1987: Towards a reappraisal of henge monuments: origins, evolution and hierarchies, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 53, 457–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conkey, M., and Spector, J., 1984: Archaeology and the study of gender, in Schiffer, M.B. (ed.), Advances in archaeological method and theory 7, New York, 1–38.Google Scholar
Connerton, P., 1989: How societies remember, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drenth, E., 1992: Flat graves and barrows of the Single Grave Culture in the Netherlands in social perspective – an interim report, in Buchvaldek, M. and Strahm, C. (eds), Die kontinentaleuropäischen Gruppen der Kultur mit Schnurkeramik. Schnurkeramik-Symposion 1990 Praha (Praehistorica 19), 207–214.Google Scholar
Drenth, E., and Lanting, A.E., 1991: Die Chronologie der Einzelgrabkultur in den Niederlanden, in Internationales Symposion Schnurkeramik 1991, Freiburg, 103–114.Google Scholar
van Es, W.A., Sarfatij, H. and Woltering, P.J. (eds), 1988; Archeologie in Nederland. De rijkdom van het bodemarchief, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Gibson, A., 1992: The timber circle at Sarn-y-Bryn-Caled, Welshpool, Powys: ritual and sacrifice in Bronze Age mid-Wales, Antiquity 66, 84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A., 1976: New rules of sociological method: a positive critique of interpretative sociologies, London.Google Scholar
van Giffen, A.E., 1930: Die Bauart der Einzelgräber. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der älteren individuelllen Grabhügelstrukturen in den Niederlanden, Leipzig (Mannus Bibliothek 44/45).Google Scholar
van Giffen, A.E., 1938: Continental bell or disc-barrows in Holland with special reference to tumulus I at Rielsch Hoefke, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 4, 258–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasbergen, W., 1954: Barrow excavations in the Eight Beautitudes, Groningen.Google Scholar
Godelier, M., 1977: Perspectives in Marxist anthropology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Green, C., and Rollo-Smith, S., 1984: The excavation of eighteen round barrows near Shrewton, Wiltshire, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 50, 255–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, R.J., 1980: The Beaker Folk, London.Google Scholar
Häusler, A., 1966: Zum Verhältnis von Männern, Frauen und Kindern in Gräbern der Steinzeit, Arbeits- und Forschungsberichte zur sächsischen Bodendenkmalpflege 14–15, 25–74.Google Scholar
Häusler, A., 1977: Die Bestattungssitten der frühen Bronzezeit zwischen Rhein und oberer Wolga, ihre Voraussetzungen und ihre Beziehungen, Zeitschrift für Archäologie 11, 13–48.Google Scholar
Häusler, A., 1983: Der Ursprung der Schnurkeramik nach Aussage der Grab- und Bestattungssitten, Jahresschrift für mitteldeutsche Vorgeschichte 66, 9–30.Google Scholar
Hermann, F.R., and Jockenhövel, A., 1975: Bronzezeitliche Grabhügel mit Pfostenringen bei Edelsberg, Kreis Limburg-Weilburg, Fundberichte aus Hessen 15, 87–127.Google Scholar
Hjørungdal, T., 1994: Poles apart. Have there been any male and female graves?, Current Swedish archaeology 2, 141–148.Google Scholar
Huntington, R., and Metcalf, P., 1979: Celebrations of death, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ille, P., 1991: Totenbrauchtum in der älteren Bronzezeit auf den dänischen Inseln, Buch am Erlbach (Internationale Archäologie 2).Google Scholar
Jager, S.W., 1985: A prehistoric route and ancient cart-tracks in the gemeente of Anloo, province of Drenthe, Palaeohistoria 27, 185–245.Google Scholar
Jockenhövel, A., 1991: Räumliche Mobilität von Personen in der mittleren Bronzezeit des westlichen Mitteleuropa, Germania 69, 49–62.Google Scholar
Kinnes, I., 1979: Round barrows and ring ditches in the British Neolithic, London.Google Scholar
Köster, H., 1968: Die mittlere Bronzezeit in nördlichen Rheintalgraben (Antiquitas 2.6), Bonn.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K., 1982: The formation of tribal systems in later European prehistory: northern Europe 4000–500 BC, in Renfrew, C., Rowlands, M.J. and Segraves, S.A. (eds), Theory and explanation in archaeology, London, 241–280.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K., 1984a: Ideology and material culture: an archaeological perspective, in Spriggs, M. (ed.), Marxist perspectives in archaeology, Cambridge, 72–100.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K., 1984b: Krieger und Häuptlinge in der Bronzezeit Dänemarks, Jahrbuch des römisch-germanisches Zentralmuseums Mainz 31, 187–209.Google Scholar
Kubach, W., 1977: Die Nadeln in Hessen und Rheinhessen, München (Prähistorische Bronzefunde 13.3).Google Scholar
de Laet, S.J., 1974: Prehistorische kulturen in het zuiden der Lage Landen, Wetteren.Google Scholar
Lanting, A.E., 1969: lets over de grafgebruiken van de Standvoetbeker Kultuur, Nieuwe Drentse volksalmanak 87, 165–78.Google Scholar
Lanting, J.N., 1973: Laat-Neolithicum en Vroege Bronstijd in Nederland en Noordwest-Duitsland: continue ontwikkelingen, Palaeohistoria 15, 216–317.Google Scholar
Lanting, J.N., and Mook, W.G., 1977: The pre- and protohistory of the Netherlands in terms of radiocarbon dates, Groningen.Google Scholar
Lanting, J.N., and van der Waals, J.D., 1972: British Beakers as seen from the continent, Helinium 12, 20–46.Google Scholar
Lanting, J.N., and van der Waals, J.D., 1976: Beaker Culture relations in the Lower Rhine basin, in Lanting, J.N. and van der Waals, J.D. (eds), Glockenbecher Symposion Oberried 1974, Bussum, 1–80.Google Scholar
Laux, F., 1971: Die Bronzezeit in der Lüneburgerheide, Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Laux, F., 1976–1977: Ein Frauengrab aus Lüllau, Gem. Jesteburg, Kr. Harburg, Bemerkungen zur Differenzierung bronzezeitlicher Brandbestattungen in der Lüneburger Heide, Hammaburg NF 3–4, 33–46.Google Scholar
Laux, F., 1983: Bronzezeitliche Kulturerscheinungen im Lüneburger Gebiet und in den angrenzenden Landschaften, Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 13, 75–84.Google Scholar
Laux, F., 1989: Zur älteren und mittleren Bronzezeit in Niedersachsen. Beiträge zur mitteleuropäischen Bronzezeit, Berlin, 275–294.Google Scholar
Lehmkühler, S., 1991: Heiratskreise in der Vorgeschichte, Archäologische Informationen 14. 2, 155–159.Google Scholar
Lewis, G., 1980: Day of shining red: an essay on understanding ritual, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohof, E., 1991a: Grafritueel en sociale verandering in de bronstijd van Noordoost-Nederland, Amsterdam (unpublished PhD thesis).Google Scholar
Lohof, E., 1991b: Catalogus van bronstijd-grafheuvels uit Noordoost-Nederland, Amsterdam (MS).Google Scholar
Louwe Kooijmans, L.P., 1974: The Rhine/Meuse delta. Four studies on its prehistoric occupation and holocene geology, Leiden (Analecta praehistorica Leidensia 7).Google Scholar
Metcalf, P., 1981: Meaning and materialism: the ritual economy of death, Man 16, 563–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizoguchi, K., 1992: A historiography of a linear barrow cemetery: a structurationist's point of view, Archaeological review from Cambridge 11.1, 39–50.Google Scholar
Modderman, P.J.R., 1954: Grafheuvelonderzoek in Midden Nederland, Berichten van de Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek 5, 7–44.Google Scholar
Neustupný, E., 1973: Factors affecting the variability of the Corded Ware Culture, in Renfrew, C. (ed.), The explanation of culture change, London, 725–730.Google Scholar
O'Shea, J.M., 1984: Mortuary variability, London.Google Scholar
Parker-Pearson, M., 1982: Mortuary practice, society and ideology: an ethnoarchaeological study, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology, Cambridge, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, F., 1972: Traditions of multiple burial in later Neolithic and Early Bronze Age Britain, Archaeological journal 129, 22–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piesker, H., 1958: Untersuchungen zur älteren lüneburgischen Bronzezeit, Lüneburg.Google Scholar
Primas, M., 1977: Untersuchungen zu den Bestattungssitten der ausgehenden Kupfer- und frühen Bronzezeit, Berichte der römisch-germanischen Kommission 58, 1–160.Google Scholar
Raddatz, K., 1979: Zur Funktion der Großsteingräber, in Schirnig, H. (ed.), Großsteingräber in Niedersachsen, Hildesheim, 127–41.Google Scholar
Randsborg, K., 1974: Social stratification in early Bronze Age Denmark: a study in the regulation of culture systems, Praehistorische Zeitschrift 49, 529–540.Google Scholar
Repogle, B.A., 1980: Social dimensions of British and German Bell-Beaker burials: an exploratory study, Journal of Indo-European studies 8, 165–199.Google Scholar
Robb, J., in press: Gender contradictions: moral coalitions and inequality in prehistoric Italy, Journal of European archaeology.Google Scholar
Ruckdeschel, W., 1978: Die frühbronzezeitlichen Gräber Südbayerns, Bonn (Antiquitas 2).Google Scholar
Shennan, S.E., 1975: The social organisation at Branc, Antiquity 49, 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shennan, S.J., 1993: Settlement and social change in Central Europe, 3500-1500 BC, Journal of world prehistory 7, 121–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siemen, P., 1992: Social structure of the Elbe-Saale Corded Ware Culture – a preliminary model, in Buchvaldek, M. and Strahm, C. (eds), Die kontinentaleuropäischen Gruppen der Kultur mit Schnurkeramik. Schnurkeramik Symposium 1990, Prague (Praehistorica 19), 229–240.Google Scholar
Sørensen, M.L.S., 1992: Gender archaeology and Danish Bronze Age studies, Norwegian archaeological review 2.1, 31–50.Google Scholar
Steuer, H., 1982: Frühgeschichtliche Sozialstrukturen in Mitteleuropa, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Struve, K.W., 1971: Die Bronzezeit. Periode I-III, Neumünster (Geschichte Schleswig-Holsteins 2).Google Scholar
Sudholz, G., 1964: Die ältere Bronzezeit zwischen Niederrhein und Mittelweser, Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Thrane, H., 1967: En bronze alder hoej ved Vesterlund, Kuml, 7–32.Google Scholar
Tilley, C., 1982: Social formation, social structures and social change, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology, Cambridge, 26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veen, M. van der, and Lanting, J.N., 1989: A group of tumuli on the ‘Hooghalen’ Estate near Hijken (municipality of Beilen, province of Drenthe, the Netherlands), Palaeohistoria 31, 191–234.Google Scholar
Waterbolk, H.T., 1958: Neolithische vlakgraven in Drenthe, Nieuwe Drentse volksalmanak 76, 3–17.Google Scholar
Waterbolk, H.T., 1962: Hauptzüge der eisenzeitlichen Besiedlung der nördlichen Niederlande, Offa 19, 9–46.Google Scholar
Waterbolk, H.T., 1964: Podsolierungserscheinungen bei Grabhügeln, Palaeohistoria 10, 87–102.Google Scholar
Wels-Weyrauch, U., 1975: Schmuckausstattungen aus Frauengräbern der jüngeren Hügelgräberbronzezeit in Deutschland (14. Jahrhundert v. Chr.), Ausgrabungen in Deutschland gefördert von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft 1950-1975 3, Mainz, 300–304.Google Scholar
Wels-Weyrauch, U., 1989: Mittelbronzezeitliche Frauentrachten in Süddeutschland, Dynamique du bronze moyen en Europe occidentale, Paris, 117–134.Google Scholar
Wilhelmi, K., 1991: Grabhügel der Bronze- und Eisenzeit bei Leschede, Lkr. Emsland, in Relation zum Raum zwischen IJssel, Oberems und Ruhr, Schottland und Harz, Helinium 31, 213–272.Google Scholar
Willroth, K.H., 1989: Nogle betragtninger over de regionale forhold i Slesvig og Holsten i bronzealderens periode II, in Poulsen, J. (ed.), Regionale forhold i Nordisk Bronzealder, Jysle, 89–100.Google Scholar
Wüstemann, H., 1978: Zur Sozialentwicklung der Bronzezeit im Norden der DDR, in Coblenz, W. and Horst, F. (eds), Mitteleuropäische Bronzezeit, Berlin, 195–209.Google Scholar
Zich, B., 1992: Besuch aus Niedersachsen in Schleswig-Holstein, Archäologie in Deutschland 3, 54.Google Scholar
Ziegert, H., 1963: Zur Chronologie und Gruppengliederung der westlichen Hügelgräberkultur, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 75 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 15th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

1 Cited by
Hostname: page-component-77fc7d77f9-cjctk Total loading time: 0.797 Render date: 2021-01-15T19:22:36.414Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Fri Jan 15 2021 18:51:05 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": true, "languageSwitch": true, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Grounding arguments about burials
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Grounding arguments about burials
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Grounding arguments about burials
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *