Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:16:24.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Verb morphology deficits in Arabic-speaking children with specific language impairment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2008

FAUZIA ABDALLA  and
MARTHA CRAGO
FAUZIA ABDALLA*
Affiliation:
Kuwait University
MARTHA CRAGO
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Fauzia Abdalla, Department of Communication Sciences, College for Women, Kuwait University, P.O. Box 5969, Safat 13060, Kuwait. E-mail: fauziamam@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores tense and agreement marking in the spontaneous production of verbs in Arabic-speaking children with specific language impairment (SLI) and two groups of typically developing children: one group matched for mean length of utterance, and the other group matched for age. The special characteristics of Arabic such as its rich bound morphology, intricate verb system, null subject properties, and lack of an infinitival form make it particularly valuable for determining universal versus language-specific aspects of SLI. The results indicate that the Arabic-speaking participants with SLI had obvious problems with verb morphology. They were significantly different from the two comparison groups of children on the percentage of correct use of tense and subject–verb agreement forms. Furthermore, when an error in verbal infection occurred, the substitute form was often an imperative form. The findings are examined in light of cross-linguistic research pertaining to the nature of the SLI deficit and its relationship with typical language learning.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , April 2008 , pp. 315 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aljenaie, K. (2001). The emergence of tense and agreement in Kuwaiti Arabic children. PhD thesis, Reading University.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. (2001). Learning an invented inflectional morpheme in Spanish by children with typical language skills and with specific language impairment (SLI). International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 36, 1–19.Google Scholar
Bakalla, M. (1979). The morphological and phonological components of the Arabic verb (Meccan Arabic). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bedore, L., & Leonard, L. (2001). Grammatical morphology deficits in Spanish-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 905–924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bedore, L. M., & Leonard, L. B. (1998). Specific language impairment and grammatical morphology: A discriminant function analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1185–1192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, D., & Leonard, L. (2000). Speech and language impairments in children: Causes, characteristics, intervention and outcome. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Bortolini, U., Caselli, M., & Leonard, L. (1997). Grammatical deficits in Italian-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 809–820.Google Scholar
Brustad, K. (2000). The syntax of spoken Arabic: A comparative study of Moroccan, Egyptian, Syrian and Kuwaiti dialects. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1989). The grammatical characterization of developmental dysphasia. Linguistics, 27, 897–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Bartke, S., & Göllner, S. (1997). Formal features in impaired grammars: A comparison of English and German SLI children. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 10, 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Dalalakis, J. (1999). Tense and agreement in Greek SLI: A case study. In Jakubowicz, L., Nash, L., & Wexler, K. (Eds.), Essays on syntax, morphology and phonology in SLI. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crago, M., & Allen, S. (2001). Early finiteness in Inuktitut: The role of language structure and input. Language Acquisition, 9, 59–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crago, M., & Paradis, J. (2003). Two of a kind: The importance of commonalities and variation across languages and learners. In Schaeffer, J. & Levy, Y. (Eds.), Towards a definition of specific language impairment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
de Jong, J. (1999). Specific language impairment in Dutch: Inflectional morphology and argument structure. Enschede, The Netherlands: Print Partners Ipskamp.Google Scholar
de Jong, J. (2002). Default verb forms in the language production of Dutch children with SLI. Paper presented at the Conference of the International Association for the Study of Child Language, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Dromi, E., Leonard, L., Adam, G., & Zadunaisky-Ehrlich, S. (1999). Verb agreement morphology in Hebrew-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1414–1431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dromi, E., Leonard, L., & Shteiman, M. (1993). The grammatical morphology of Hebrew-speaking children with specific language impairment: Some competing hypotheses. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 760–771.Google Scholar
Fletcher, P., Leonard, L., Stokes, S., & Wong, A. (2005). The expression of aspect in Cantonese-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 621–634.Google Scholar
Hakansson, G., Salameh, E., & Nettelbladt, U. (2003). Measuring language development in bilingual children: Swedish–Arabic children with and without language impairment. Linguistics, 41, 255–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, K., Nettelbladt, U., & Leonard, L. (2000). Specific language impairment in Swedish: The status of verb morphology and word order. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 84–86.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. (1998). Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. (2000). Specific language impairment across languages. In Bishop, D. V. M. & Leonard, L. (Eds.), Speech and language impairments in children: Causes, characteristics, intervention and outcome (pp. 115–129). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. (2002). SLI across several languages: Some new findings. Plenary paper presented at the Conference of the International Association for the Study of Child Language, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Leonard, L., Bortolini, U., Caselli, M., McGregor, K., & Sabbadini, L. (1992). Morphological deficits in children with specific language impairment: The status of features in the underlying grammar. Language Acquisition, 21, 151–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, L., Camarata, S., Brown, B., & Camarata, M. (2004). Tense and agreement in the speech of children with specific language impairment: Patterns of generalization through intervention. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1363–1379.Google Scholar
Leonard, L., Dromi, E., Adam, G., & Zadunaisky-Ehrlich, S. (2000). Tense and finiteness in the speech of children with specific language impairment acquiring Hebrew. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 35, 319–335.Google Scholar
Leonard, L., Eyer, J., Bedore, L., & Grela, B. (1997). Three accounts of the grammatical morpheme difficulties of English-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 741–753.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1991). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J., & Prince, A. (1988). Prosodic morphology and templatic morphology. In Eid, M. & McCarthy, J. (Eds.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics: Papers from the second annual symposium on Arabic linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Meyer Bjerkan, K. (1999). Do SLI children have an optional infinitive stage? Paper presented at the Conference of the International Association for the Study of Child Language, San Sebastian, Spain.Google Scholar
Mohammad, A. M. (2000). Word order, agreement and pronominalization in standard and Palestinian Arabic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morsi, R. (2006). A preliminary investigation on an Arabic-speaking child with SLI. Paper presented at the Linguistics Association of Great Britain Conference, Newcastle, England.Google Scholar
O'Grady, W., & Dobrovolsky, M. (1996). Contemporary linguistic analysis: An introduction. Toronto: Copp Clark Ltd.Google Scholar
Paradis, J., & Crago, M. (2001). The morphosyntax of specific language impairment in French: An extended optional default account. Language Acquisition, 9, 269–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poeppel, D. (1996). Commentary on chapter 10 (Crago & Allen). In Rice, M. (Ed.), Toward a genetics of language. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Poeppel, D., & Wexler, K. (1993). The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language, 69, 1–33.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, R. (1998). The “broken” plural in Arabic and comparative Semitic: Allormorphy and analogy in non-concatenative morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redmond, S. (2003). Children's production of the affix-ed in past tense and past participle contexts. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 1095–1109.Google Scholar
Rice, M. (2000). Grammatical symptoms of specific language impairment. In Bishop, D. V. M. & Leonard, L. (Eds.), Speech and language impairments in children: Causes, characteristics, intervention and outcome (pp. 17–34). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Rice, M., Noll, K., & Grimm, H. (1997). An extended optional infinitive stage in German-speaking children with specific language impairment. Language Acquisition, 6, 255–295.Google Scholar
Rice, M., & Wexler, K. (1996). Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1239–1257.Google Scholar
Rice, M., Wexler, K., & Cleave, P. (1995). Specific language impairments as a period of extended optional infinitive. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 850–863.Google Scholar
Rice, M., Wexler, K., & Hershberger, S. (1998). Tense over time: The longitudinal course of tense acquisition in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1412–1431.Google Scholar
Roberts, S., & Leonard, L. (1997). Grammatical deficits in German and English: A crosslinguistic study of children with specific language impairment. First Language, 17, 131–150.Google Scholar
Salameh, E., Hakansson, G., & Nettelbladt, U. (2004). Developmental perspectives on bilingual Swedish–Arabic children with and without language impairment: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 39, 65–90.Google Scholar
Sieny, M. E. (1978). The syntax of urban Hijazi Arabic. Beirut: Librairie du Liban.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. & Slobin, D. (Eds.), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Tager-Flusberg, H., & Cooper, J. (1999). Present and future possibilities for defining a phenotype for specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1261–1274.Google Scholar
Varlokosta, S., Vainikka, A., & Rohrbacher, B. (1998). Functional projections, markedness, and “root infinitives” in early child Greek. Linguistic Review, 15, 187–207.Google Scholar
Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 106, 23–79.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, R. (1997). Negation and clausal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar