Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T04:59:31.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On correlating aphasic errors with slips-of-the-tongue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Hugh W. Buckingham Jr
Hugh W. Buckingham Jr*
Affiliation:
Purdue University
*
Hugh W. Buckingham, Jr., Department of Audiology and Speech Sciences, Heavilon Hall, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It has been stated that the study of aphasia tells us little or nothing about normal language. On the other hand, it is commonplace to consider that slips of the tongue do. In this paper I show that many kinds of aphasic errors demonstrate precisely what slips in normals do. Consequently, it is not unreasonable to consider that the study of aphasia can indeed shed light on normal language processes as well as aphasic processes and can be handled in a framework designed to account for slips of the tongue in normal speakers. Similar “editing” mechanisms are needed for explaining the structure of errors produced by both aphasics and normals. Finally, it is suggested that this approach can help us further understand what is not abnormal in aphasia in general, as well as highlight the ways in which distinct types of aphasic “slips” can characterize different syndromes. Consequently, we will have gained additional information regarding the nature of aphasia itself.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , May 1980 , pp. 199 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baars, B. J., Motley, M. T., & MacKay, D. G.Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1975, 14, 382–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumstein, S. E.A phonological investigation of aphasic speech. The Hague: Mouton, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumstein, S. E. Segment structure and the syllable in aphasia. In Bell, A. and Hooper, J.B. (Eds.), Syllables and segments. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1978.Google Scholar
Blumstein, S. E., Cooper, W. E., Zurif, E. B., & Caramazza, A.The perception and production of voice-onset time in aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 1977, 15, 371–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boomer, D., & Laver, J.Slips of the tongue. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 1968, 3, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, J. W.Mind, brain and consciousness: The neuropsychology of cognition. New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Buckingham, H. W.The conduction theory and neologistic jargon. Language and Speech. 1977a, 20, 174–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckingham, H. W.A critique of A. R. Luria's neurodynamic explanation of paraphasia. Brain and Language, 1977b, 4, 580–587.Google Scholar
Buckingham, H. W. Linguistic aspects of lexical retrieval disturbances in the posterior fluent aphasia. In Whitaker, H. & Whitaker, H. A. (Eds.), Studies in neurolinguistics, Vol. 4. New York: Academic Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Buckingham, H. W., & Kertesz, A.Neologistic jargon aphasia. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1976.Google Scholar
Buckingham, H. W., & Rekart, D. M.Semantic paraphasia. Journal of Communication Disorders. 1979, 12, 197–209.Google Scholar
Buckingham, H. W., Avakian-Whitaker, H., & Whitaker, H. A.Alliteration and assonance in neologistic jargon aphasia. Cortex, 1978, 14, 365–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckingham, H. W., Whitaker, H., & Whitaker, H. A. On linguistic perseveration. In Whitaker, H. and Whitaker, H. A. (Eds.), Studies in neurolinguistics. Vol. 4. New York: Academic Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Caramazza, A., & Berndt, R. S.Semantic and syntactic processes in aphasia: A review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin. 1978, 85, 898–918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, H. H., & Clark, E. V.Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1977.Google Scholar
Eisenson, J.Adult aphasia. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973.Google Scholar
Ellis, A. W. Speech production and short-term memory. In Morton, J. and Marshall, J. C. (Eds.), Psycholinguistics 2: Structures and processes. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Fay, D., & Cutler, A.Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry, 1977, 5, 505–520.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A.Psychological explanation. New York: Random House, 1968.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A.The language of thought. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell, 1975.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A., Bever, T. G., & Garrett, M. F.The psychology of language: An introduction to psycholinguistics and generative grammar. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974.Google Scholar
Fromkin, V. A.The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 1971, 47, 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromkin, V. A. Putting the emPHAsis on the wrong sylLABle. In Hyman, L. M. (Ed.), Studies in stress and accent. Los Angeles: Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California, 1977. (Ed.), Speech errors as linguistic evidence. The Hague: Mouton, 1973.Google Scholar
Fry, D. B.Phonemic substitutions in an aphasic patient. Language and Speech. 1959, 2, 52–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, M. F. The analysis of sentence production. In. Bower, G. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. New York: Academic Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Goodglass, H.Selected papers in neurolinguistics. München: Verlag, 1978.Google Scholar
Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E.The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1972.Google Scholar
Green, E.Phonological and grammatical aspects of jargon in an aphasic patient: A case study. Language and Speech, 1969, 12, 103–118.Google Scholar
Halle, M.Prolegomena to a theory of word formation. Linguistic Inquiry, 1973, 4, 3–16.Google Scholar
Itoh, M., Sasanuma, S., & Ushijima, T.Velar movements during speech in a patient with apraxia of speech. Brain and Language, 1979, 7, 227–239.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. Towards a linguistic typology of aphasic impairments. In DeReuck, A. & O'Connor, M. (Eds.), Disorders of language. London: Churchill, 1964.Google Scholar
Kahn, D. Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, M.I.T., 1976.Google Scholar
Kean, M.-L.The linguistic interpretation of aphasic syndromes: Agrammatism in Broca's aphasia, an example. Cognition. 1977, 5, 9–46.Google Scholar
Kean, M.-L.Agrammatism: A phonological deficit. Cognition. 1979, 7, 69–83.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P.A course inphonetics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1975.Google Scholar
Lecours, A., & Lhermitte, F.Phonemic paraphasias: Linguistic structures and tentative hypotheses. Cortex. 1969, 5, 193–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. Review of Speech and Brain Mechanisms by W. Penfield and L. Roberts. In Oldfield, R.C., and Marshall, J.C. (Eds.), Language. Middlesex, England: Penguin, 1968.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R.Traumatic aphasia. The Hague: Mouton, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luria, A. R.Language and brain: Towards the basic problems of neurolinguistics. Brain and Language, 1974, 1, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luria, A. R. Basic problems of langauge in the light of psychology and neurolinguistics. In Lenneberg, E.H. and Lenneberg, E. (Eds.) Foundations of Language Development. New York: Academic Press, 1975.Google Scholar
MacKay, D. G. Spoonerisms: The structure of errors in the serial order of speech. In Fromkin, V. A. (Ed.), Speech errors as linguistic evidence. The Hague: Mouton, 1973.Google Scholar
Marin, O. S. M., Saffran, E. M., & Schwartz, M. F. Dissociations of language in aphasia: Implications for normal function. In Harnad, S. R., Steklis, H. D., and Lancaster, J. (Eds.), Origins and evolution of language and speech. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, Vol. 280. New York, 1976.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. C. Disorders in the expression of language. In Morton, J. and Marshall, J. C. (Eds.), Psycholinguistics: Developmental and pathological. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, S. G. The tongue slips into patterns. In Sciarone, A. G., van Essen, A. J., and van Raad, A. A., (Eds.), Nomen: Leyden studies in linguistics and phonetics. The Hague: Mouton, 1969.Google Scholar
Panse, F., & Shimoyama, T. On the effects of aphasic disturbances in Japanese: Agrammatism and paragrammatism. In Goodglass, H. and Blumstein, S. (Eds.), Psycholinguistics and aphasia. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L., & Pike, E.Immediate constituents of Mazaleco syllables. International Journal of American Linguistics. 1947, 13, 78–91.Google Scholar
Riese, W.A history of neurology. New York: MD Publications, 1959.Google Scholar
Rinnert, C., & Whitaker, H. A.Semantic confusions by aphasic patients. Cortex. 1973, 9, 56–81.Google Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. Speech errors as evidence for a serial order mechanism in sentence production. In Cooper, W. E. and Walker, E. C. T. (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguislic studies presented to Merrill Garrett. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1979.Google Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Klatt, D. H.The limited use of distinctive features and markedness in speech production: Evidence from speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1979, 18, 41–55.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. Words and syllables in natural generative grammar. In Bruck, A., Fox, R., and LaGaly, M. (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on natural phonology. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 1974.Google Scholar
Wells, R. S. Predicting slips of the tongue. In Fromkin, V. A. (Ed.), Speech errors as linguistic evidence. The Hague: Mouton, 1973.Google Scholar
Whilehouse, P., Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. B.Naming in aphasia: Interacting effects of form and function. Brain and Language, 1978, 6, 63–74.Google Scholar
Zurif, E. B., & Blumslein, S. E. Language and the brain. In Halle, M., Bresnan, J., & Miller, G. A. (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Zurif, E. B., Caramazza, A., & Myerson, R.Grammatical judgments of agrammatic aphasics. Neuropsychologia, 1972, 10, 405–417.Google Scholar
Zurif, E. B., Green, E., Caramazza, A., & Goodenough, C.Grammatical intuitions of aphasic patients: Sensitivity to functors. Cortex, 1976, 12, 183–186.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. M. Classical malapropisms. Paper presented at the Fortieth Summer Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Urbana, Illinois, 07 1978.Google Scholar