Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:24:13.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Literate discourse and cognitive organization: Some relations between parents' talk and 3-year-olds' thought

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Rita Watson
Rita Watson*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
*
Rita Watson, Department of Educational Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z5, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Implicit in much work on literate discourse and its consequences is the question of what relation exists between forms of discourse and cognitive organization. The focus of this article is the relation between specific features of literate discourse and paradigmatic organization in children's thought. Nineteen parent–child dyads were videotaped during bookreading when the child was 2½ years old. Three levels of object labels and reference to propositional attitudes were coded in parents' talk during bookreading episodes with their children. Three measures of paradigmatic organization in the child's thought were obtained at age 3½. The features of parents' talk were then correlated with measures of the child's thought. A significant correlation was found between superordinate level labels in parents' talk and all three measures of children's paradigmatic organization, but basic and subordinate level labels were not correlated. Parents' use of cognitive verbs and verbs referring to labeling and interpretation were also correlated with children's paradigmatic organization. The results are interpreted as indicating situation-specific organizational preferences in talk and thought.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , June 1989 , pp. 221 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anglin, J. (1977). Word, object and conceptual development. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Bretherton, I., & Beeghly, M. (1982). Talking about internal States: The acquisition of an explicit theory of mind. Developmental Psychology, 18(6), 906–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1958). How shall a thing be called? Psychological Review, 65(1), 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language, the early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1983). Child's talk: Learning to use words. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S., Olver, R., & Greenfield, P. (1966). Studies in cognitive growth. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S., & Oison, D. R. (1978). Symbols and texts as tools of intellect. Interchange, 8(4), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazden, C. (1985). Classroom discourse. In Wittrock, M. C. (Ed.), Research on teaching (3rd. ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chafe, W., & Danielowicz, J. (1987). Properties of written and spoken language (Technical Report #5). Berkeley: University of California, Centre for the Study of Writing.Google Scholar
Feldman, C. (in press). Oral metalanguage. In D. R. Olson (Ed.), Literacy and orality.Google Scholar
Goody, J., & Watt, I. (1968). The consequences of literacy. In Goody, J. (Ed.), Literacy in traditional societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3). London: Academic.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. (1963). Preface to Plato. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, S. (1983). Ways with words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J. (1974). The origins of language comprehension. In Solso, R. L. (Ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In Sebeok, T. A. (Ed.), Style in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. N., & Wellman, H. M. (1980). Children's developing understanding of mental verbs: Remember, know and guess. Child Development, 48, 1743–1747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacNamara, J. (1982). Names for things. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Markman, E. (1987). How children constrain the possible meanings of words. In Neisser, U. (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Markman, E., & Callanan, M. (1984). An analysis of hierarchical classification. In Sternberg, R. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ninio, A. (1983). Joint bookreading as a multiple vocabulary acquisition device. Developmental Psychology, 19(3), 445–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ninio, A., & Bruner, J. S. (1978). The achievement and antecedents of labelling. Journal of Child Language, 5, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47(3), 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. R. (1986). The cognitive consequences of literacy. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 27: 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. R., & Astington, J. W. (1986). Children's acquisition of metalinguistic and meta-cognitive verbs. In Demopoulous, W. & Marras, A. (Eds.), Language learning and concept acquisition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Ong, W. (1982). Orality and literacy. London: Methuen & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinsland, H. D. (1945). A basic vocabulary of elementary school children. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. (1950). Definition. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representation of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sattler, J. (1982). The assessment of children's intelligence and special abilities (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (1981). Narrative, literacy and race in interethnic communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Scribner, S. (1978). Modes of thinking and ways of speaking: Culture and logic reconsidered. In Freedle, R. (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (pp. 483–500). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981) The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, D., Cole, M., & Lave, C. (1979). Education and cognitive development: The evidence from experimental research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 44 (1–2, Serial No. 178).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E., & Medin, L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, C. (1983). Literacy and language: Relationships during the preschool years. Harvard Educational Review, 53(2), 165–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, C., & Ninio, A. (1986). The contracts of literacy: What children learn from learning to read books. In Teale, W. & Sulzby, E. (Eds.), Emergent literacy: Writing and reading. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Stock, B. (1983). The implications of literacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D. (1982). Oral and literate strategies in spoken and written narratives. Language, 58(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D. (1985). Relative focus of involvement in oral and written discourse. In Olson, D., Torrance, N., & Hildyard, A. (Eds.), Literacy, language and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp. 124–147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, R. (1985). Toward a theory of definition. Journal of Child Language, 12, 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, G. (1981). Learning through interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, H. (1985). The child's theory of mind. In Yussen, S. R. (Ed.), The growth of reflection in children. Orlando, FL: Academic.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. (Ed.). (1981). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar