Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Lexical restructuring in preliterate children: Evidence from novel measures of phonological representation

  • STEPHANIE AINSWORTH (a1), STEPHEN WELBOURNE (a2) and ANNE HESKETH (a2)

Abstract

There is substantial debate in the literature surrounding the development of children's phonological representations (PRs). Although infant studies have shown children's representations to contain fine phonetic detail, a consensus is yet to be reached about how and when phonemic categories emerge. This study used novel implicit PR measures with preschool children (n = 38, aged 3 years, 6 months to 4 years, 6 months) to test predictions made by these competing accounts of PR development. The measures were designed to probe PR segmentation at the phoneme (rather than the phone) level without requiring an explicit awareness of phonemes. The results provide evidence in support of vocabulary driven restructuring, with PR segmentation found to be related to vocabulary when controlling for age.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Lexical restructuring in preliterate children: Evidence from novel measures of phonological representation
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Lexical restructuring in preliterate children: Evidence from novel measures of phonological representation
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Lexical restructuring in preliterate children: Evidence from novel measures of phonological representation
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/.

Corresponding author

ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Stephanie Ainsworth, Faculty of Education, Brooks Building, Manchester Metropolitan University, Bonsall Street, Manchester M15 6GX, UK. E-mail: s.ainsworth@mmu.ac.uk

References

Hide All
Alt, M., & Suddarth, R. (2012). Learning novel words: Detail and vulnerability of initial representations for children with specific language impairment and typically developing peers. Journal of Communication Disorders, 45, 8497.
Anthony, J. L., Aghara, R. G., Solari, E. J., Dunkelberger, M. J., Williams, J. M., & Liang, L. (2011). Quantifying phonological representation abilities in Spanish-speaking preschool children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 1949.
Anthony, J. L., Williams, J. M., Aghara, R. G., Dunkelberger, M., Novak, B., & Mukherjee, A. D. (2010). Assessment of individual differences in phonological representation. Reading and Writing, 23, 969994.
Bailey, T. M., & Plunkett, K. (2002). Phonological specificity in early words. Cognitive Development, 17, 12651282.
Ballem, K. D., & Plunkett, K. (2005). Phonological specificity in children at 1;2. Journal of Child Language, 32, 159173.
Carroll, J. M., & Myers, J. M. (2011). Spoken word classification in children and adults. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 54, 127147.
Casserly, E., & Pisoni, D. B. (2010). Speech perception & production. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1, 629647.
Claessen, M., Heath, S., Fletcher, J., Hogben, J., & Leitão, S. (2009). Quality of phonological representations: A window into the lexicon? International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44, 121144.
Claessen, M., & Leitao, S. (2012). The relationship between stored phonological representations and speech output. International Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 14, 226234.
Coady, J. A., & Aslin, R. N. (2004). Young children's sensitivity to probabilistic phonotactics in the developing lexicon. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89, 183213.
Coady, J. A., & Evans, J. L. (2008). Uses and interpretations of non-word repetition tasks in children with and without specific language impairments (SLI). International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 43, 140.
Cole, R. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1980). Listening for mispronunciations in a children's story: The use of context by children and adults. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 297315.
Diehl, R. H., Lotto, A. J., & Holt, L. L. (2004). Speech perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 149179.
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, D. M., Sewell, J., Styles, B., Bryzska, B., Shamsan, Y., et al. (2009). The British Picture Vocabulary Scale. London: GL Assessment.
Elbro, C., & Petersen, D. K. (2004). Long-term effects of phoneme awareness and letter sound training: An intervention study with children at risk for dyslexia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 660670.
Elliot, L. L., Hammer, M. A., & Evan, K. E. (1987). Perception of gated, highly familiar spoken monosyllabic nouns by children, teenagers, and older adults. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 150157.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272299.
Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., Buccino, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: A TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 399402.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Fowler, A. E. (1991). How early phonological development might set the stage for phonological awareness. In Brady, S. & Shankweiler, D. (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 97117). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fowler, A. E., & Swainson, B. (2004). Relationships of naming skills to reading, memory, and receptive vocabulary: Evidence of imprecise phonological representations of words by poor readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 247280.
Foy, J. G., & Mann, V. A. (2009). Effects of onset density in preschool children: Implications for development of phonological awareness and phonological representation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 339361.
Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2006). The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 361377.
Gathercole, S. E., & Adams, A. M. (1993). Phonological working memory in very young children. Developmental Psychology, 29, 770778.
Gathercole, S. E., Service, E., Hitch, C. J., Adams, A. M., & Martin, A. J. (1999). Phonological short-term memory and vocabulary development: Further evidence on the nature of the relationship. Applied Cognitive Psychology 13, 6577.
Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C., Emslie, H., & Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Phonological memory and vocabulary development during the early school years: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 28, 887898.
Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 267283.
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007). The cortical organization of speech processing. National Review of Neuroscience, 8, 393402.
Jusczyk, P. W. (1993). From general to language-specific capacities: The WRAPSA model of how speech perception develops. Journal of Phonetics, 21, 328.
Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141151.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. S., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431461.
Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 136.
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, A. M. (1989). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In Shankweiler, D. & Liberman, I. Y. (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (pp. 133). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Mackensen, N., & Fikkert, P. (2010). The acquisition of the stop-fricative contrast in perception and production. Lingua, 120, 18981909.
MacMillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user's guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Massaro, D. W. (1987). Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Massaro, D. W. (1998). Perceiving talking faces: From speech perception to a behavioral principle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746748.
McNeill, B. C., & Hesketh, A. (2010). Developmental complexity of the stimuli included in mispronunciation detection tasks. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 45, 7282.
Metsala, J. L., & Walley, A. C. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In Metsala, J. L. & Ehri, L. C. (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 89120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Morais, J., Bertelson, P., Cary, L., & Alegria, J. (1986). Literacy training and speech segmentation. Cognition, 24, 4564.
Nittrouer, S., Studdert-Kennedy, M., & McGowan, R. S. (1989). The emergence of phonetic segments: Evidence from the spectral structure of fricative-vowel syllables spoken by children and adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 120132.
Pardo, J. S. (2006). On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 119, 23822393.
Renfrew, C. (1995). Word Finding Vocabulary Test. London: Speechmark.
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131141.
Rizzilatti, G., Fadiga, L., Matelli, M., Bettinardi, V., Paulesu, E., Perani, D., et al. (1996). Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution. Experimental Brain Research, 111, 246255.
Storkel, H. L. (2002). Restructuring similarity neighborhoods in the developing mental lexicon. Journal of Child Language, 29, 251274.
Sutherland, D., & Gillon, G. T. (2005). Assessment of phonological representations in children with speech impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 294307.
Swan, D., & Goswami, U. (1997). Phonological awareness deficits in developmental dyslexia and the phonological representations hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 1841.
Swingley, D. (2009). Onsets and codas in 1.5-year-olds’ word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 252269.
Swingley, D., & Aslin, R. N. (2000). Spoken word recognition and lexical representation in very young children. Cognition, 76, 147166.
Swingley, D., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Lexical neighborhoods and the word-form representations of 14-month-olds. Psychological Science, 13, 480484.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). London: Pearson.
Treiman, R., & Breaux, A. (1982). Common phoneme and overall stimulating relations among spoken syllables: Their use by children and adults. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 11, 569597.
Vance, M., Stackhouse, J., & Wells, B. (2005). Speech-production skills in children aged 3–7 years. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 40, 2948.
Walley, A. C. (1987). Young children's detections of word-initial and -final mispronunciations in constrained and unconstrained contexts. Cognitive Development, 2, 145167.
Walley, A. C. (1988). Spoken word recognition by young children and adults. Cognitive Development, 3, 137165.
Walley, A. C. (1993). The role of vocabulary development in children's spoken word recognition and segmentation ability. Developmental Review, 13, 286350.
Walley, A. C., Metsala, J. L., & Garlock, V. M. (2003). Spoken vocabulary growth: Its role in the development of phoneme awareness and early reading ability. Reading and Writing, 16, 520.
Walley, A. C., Michela, V. L., & Wood, D. R. (1995). The gating paradigm: Effects of presentation format on spoken word recognition by children and adults. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 343351.
Werker, J. F., & Curtin, S. (2005). PRIMIR: A developmental model of speech processing. Language Learning and Development, 1, 197234.
Werker, J. F., Fennell, C. T., Corcoran, K. M., & Stager, C. L. (2002). Infants’ ability to learn phonetically similar words: Effects of age and vocabulary. Infancy, 3, 130.
Wesseling, R., & Reitsma, P. (2001). Preschool phonological representations and development of reading skills. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 203229.
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. C. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 329.
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Ainsworth supplementary material
Ainsworth supplementary material 1

 Word (34 KB)
34 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed