Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Individual differences in syntactic priming in language acquisition

  • EVAN KIDD (a1)
Abstract

Although the syntactic priming methodology is a promising tool for language acquisition researchers, using the technique with children raises issues that are not problematic in adult research. The current paper reports on an individual differences study that addressed some of these outstanding issues. (a) Does priming purely reflect syntactic knowledge, or are other processes involved? (b) How can we explain individual differences, which are the norm rather than the exception? (c) Do priming effects in developmental populations reflect the same mechanisms thought to be responsible for priming in adults? One hundred twenty-two (N = 122) children aged 4 years, 5 months (4;5)–6;11 (mean = 5;7) completed a syntactic priming task that aimed to prime the English passive construction, in addition to standardized tests of vocabulary, grammar, and nonverbal intelligence. The results confirmed the widely held assumption that syntactic priming reflects the presence of syntactic knowledge, but not in every instance. However, they also suggested that nonlinguistic processes contribute significantly to priming. Priming was in no way related to age. Finally, the children's linguistic knowledge and nonverbal ability determined the manner in which they were primed. The results provide a clearer picture of what it means to be primed in acquisition.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Individual differences in syntactic priming in language acquisition
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Individual differences in syntactic priming in language acquisition
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Individual differences in syntactic priming in language acquisition
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Evan Kidd, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. E-mail: e.kidd@latrobe.edu.au
References
Hide All
Abbot-Smith, K., & Behrens, H. (2006). How known constructions influence the acquisition of other constructions: The German passive and future constructions. Cognitive Science, 30, 9951026.
Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2001). What pre-school children do and do not do with ungrammatical word orders. Cognitive Development, 16, 679692.
Akhtar, N. (1999). Acquiring basic word order: Evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure. Journal of Child Language, 26, 339356.
Ambridge, B., Theakston, A., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2006). The distributed learning effect for children's acquisition of an abstract grammatical construction. Cognitive Development, 21, 174193.
Bates, E., Dale, P. S., & Thal, D. (1995). Individual differences and their implications for theories of language development. In Fletcher, P. & MacWhinney, B. (Eds.), Handbook of child language (pp. 96151). Oxford: Blackwell.
Bencini, G. M. L., & Valian, V. V. (2008). Abstract sentence representations in 3-year-olds: Evidence from language production and comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 97113.
Bishop, D. (2003). Test of Receptive Grammar (2nd ed.). Oxford: Harcourt Assessment.
Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355387.
Bock, J. K., Dell, G. S., Chang, F., & Onishi, K. H. (2007). Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production. Cognition, 105, 437458.
Bock, J. K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of syntactic priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 177192.
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic priming in written production: Evidence for rapid decay. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 635640.
Brooks, P., & Tomasello, M. (1999). Young children learn to produce passive with nonce verbs. Developmental Psychology, 35, 2944.
Brownell, R. (2000). Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test. Novato: Academic Therapy Publications.
Budwig, N. (1990). The linguistic marking of non-prototypical agency: An exploration into children's use of passives. Linguistics, 28, 12211252.
Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., & Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 97, 404431.
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, J. K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113, 234272.
Chang, F., Kobayashi, T., & Amano, S. (2009). Social factors in the acquisition of a new word order. First Language, 29, 427445.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cohen, M. J. (1997). Children's memory scales. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). The British Picture Vocabulary Scale. London: NFER-Nelson.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1885/1913). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College.
Ferreira, V. S., & Bock, J. K. (2006). The functions of syntactic priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 10111029.
Genter, D., & Namy, L. L. (2006). Analogical processes in language learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 297301.
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52, 4546.
Gertner, Y., Fisher, C., & Eisengart, J. (2006). Learning words and rules: Abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension. Psychological Science, 17, 684691.
Horgan, D. (1978). The development of the full passive. Journal of Child Language, 5, 6580.
Howell, D. C. (1992). Statistical method of psychology (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E., & Levine, S. (2002). Language input and child syntax. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 337374.
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., & Shimpi, P. (2004). Syntactic priming in young children. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 182195.
Israel, M., Johnson, C., & Brooks, P. (2000). From states to events: The acquisition of English passive participles. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 103129.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2009). Nativism versus neurocontructivism: Rethinking the study of developmental disorders. Developmental Psychology, 45, 5663.
Kaschak, M. P. (2007). Long-term structural priming affects subsequent patterns of language production. Memory & Cognition, 35, 925937.
Kaschak, M. P., Loney, R. A., & Borreggine, K. L. (2006). Recent experience affects the strength of structural priming. Cognition, 99, B73B82.
Maratsos, M. P., Fox, D. E. C., Becker, J. A., & Chalkley, M. A. (1985). Semantic restrictions on children's passives. Cognition, 19, 167191.
Marchman, V., Bates, E., Burkhardt, A., & Good, A. (1991). Functional constraints on the acquisition of the passive: Toward a model of competence to perform. First Language, 11, 6592.
Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2005). The role of frequency in the acquisition of English word order. Cognitive Development, 20, 121126.
Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2007). French children's use and correction of weird word orders: A constructivist account. Journal of Child Language, 34, 381409.
McKee, C., & McDaniel, D. (2004). Multiple influences on children's language performance. Journal of Child Language, 31, 489492.
Messenger, K., Branigan, H., McLean, J., & Sorace, A. (2008). English-speaking children's early passives: Evidence from syntactic priming. In Chan, H., Jacob, H., & Kapia, E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 275286). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Nitschke, S., Kidd, E., & Serratrice, L. (2010). First language transfer and long-term structural priming in L1 and L2 comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 94114.
Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). Syntactic priming in language production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 136141.
Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1999). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 633651.
Pickering, M. J., & Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Syntactic priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 427459.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169225.
Raven, J. (2004). Coloured Progressive Matrices and Chrichton Vocabulary Scale. London: Pearson Assessment.
Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1987). A manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Tests. London: H. K. Lewis.
Savage, C., Lieven, E. V. M., Theakston, A. L., & Tomasello, M. (2003). Testing the abstractness of children's linguistic representations: Lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children. Developmental Science, 6, 557567.
Savage, C., Lieven, E. V. M., Theakston, A. L., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Structural priming as implicit learning in language acquisition: The persistence of lexical and syntactic priming in 4-year-olds. Language Learning and Development, 2, 2749.
Shimpi, P. M., Gámez, P. B., Huttenlocher, J., & Vasilyeva, M. (2007). Syntactic priming in 3- and 4-year-old children: Evidence for abstract representations of transitive and dative forms. Developmental Psychology, 43, 13341346.
Sudhalter, V., & Braine, M. (1985). How does comprehension of passives develop? A comparison of actional and experimental verbs. Journal of Child Language, 12, 455470.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vasilyeva, M., Huttenlocher, J., & Waterfall, H. (2006). Effect of language intervention on syntactic skill levels in preschoolers. Developmental Psychology, 42, 164174.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Applied Psycholinguistics
  • ISSN: 0142-7164
  • EISSN: 1469-1817
  • URL: /core/journals/applied-psycholinguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed