Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:11:05.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hypotheses on the dissociation between “referential” and “modalizing” verbal behavior in aphasia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Jean-Luc Nespoulous ,
Chris Code ,
Jacques Virbel  and
André Roch Lecours
Jean-Luc Nespoulous*
Affiliation:
Universite de Toulouse-Le Mirail
Chris Code
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Jacques Virbel
Affiliation:
Universite Paul Sabatier
André Roch Lecours
Affiliation:
Universite de Montreal
*
Departement des Sciences du Langage, Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail, 5, allée Antonio Machado, 31058 TOULOUSE CEDEX, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We develop the distinction between “referential” and “modalizing” aspects of language and describe their functional dissociation, as observed in various manifestations of aphasia and in the speech of hemispherectomy and commissurotomy patients. Such a frequently observable dissociation is taken to reflect certain cognitive and neurobiological distinctions that do not seem to be accounted for by the structurally motivated linguistic models currently utilized in neurolinguistic studies. The dissociation appears to generate fresh and original insights when applied to acquired language impairments.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , April 1998 , pp. 311 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baillarger, J. (1980). De laphasie au point de vue psychologique 1865. In Recherches sur lesmaladies mentales (pp. 584–601). Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Bally, C. (1942). Syntaxe de la modality explicite. In F. cahiers de saussure. Genve: Droz.Google Scholar
Basso, A., Lecours, A. R., Moraschini, S., Vanier, M. (1985). Anatomoclinical correlations ofthe aphasias as defined through computerized tomography: Exceptions. Brain and Language, 26, 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckingham, H. W., Avakian-Whitaker, H., Whitaker, H. (1975). Linguistic structures in stereotyped aphasic speech. Linguistics, 154155.Google Scholar
Buckingham, H. W., Kertesz, A. (1976). Neologistic jargonaphasia. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Carneiro do Couto, A. M., Marques da Silva, M. M. (1979). La stratgie de lecture de Iimagevue travers Ianalyse du discours. Mmoire de psycholinguistique (sous la direction de J.-L. Nespoulous). Toulouse: University de Toulouse-Le Mirail.Google Scholar
Code, C. (1982). Neurolinguistic analysis of recurrent utterances in aphasia. Cortex, 18, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Code, C. (1987). Language, aphasia, and the right hemisphere. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Code, C. (1991). Speech automatisms and recurring utterances. In Code, C. (Ed.), The characteristics of aphasia (pp. 155–178). Hove: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Code, C. (1994). Speech automatisms in aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 8, 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Code, C. (1996). Speech from the isolated right hemisphere? Left hemispherectomy cases E.C. and N.F. In Code, C., Wallesch, C.-W., Joanette, Y., Lecours, A. R. (Eds.), Classic cases in neuropsychology. Hove: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Code, C. (1997). Can the right hemisphere speak? Brain and Language, 57, 38–59.Google Scholar
Crosson, B. (1985). Subcortical functions in language: A working model. Brain and Language, 25, 257–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bleser, R.Poeck, K. (1985). Analysis of prosody in the spontaneous speech of patients with CV-recurring utterances. Cortex, 21, 405–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrett, M. (1982). Production of speech: Observations from normal and pathological language use. In Ellis, A. (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (pp. 19–76). London: Academic.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, M. S. (1970). The bisected brain. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Gougenheim, G., Michea, R., Rivenc, P.Sauvageot, A. (1962). Velaboration du Francois Fondamental. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H. (1879). On affections of speech from disease of the brain. In Taylor, J. (Ed.), Selected writings of John Hughlings Jackson (Vol. 2, pp. 129–137). London: Staples Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1968). Child language, aphasia and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joanette, Y., Goulet, P., Hannequin, D. (1990). Right hemisphere and verbal communication. New York: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamandella, J. T. (1977). The limbic system in human communication. In Whitaker, H.Whitaker, H. A. (Eds.), Studies in neurolinguistics (Vol. 3, pp. 157–222). London: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lhermitte, F.Lecours, A. R., Escourolle, R. (1973). Unexpected anatomical findings in a case of fluent jargonaphasia. Cortex, 9, 433–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luria, A. R. (1970). Traumatic aphasia. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nespoulous, J.-L. (1980). De deux comportements verbaux de base: Referentiel et modalisateur. De leur dissociation dans le discours aphasique. Cahiers de Psychologie, 23, 195–210.Google Scholar
Nespoulous, J.-L. (1981). Two basic types of semiotic behavior. Their dissociation in aphasia. Publications Series of the Toronto Semiotic Circle, II & III, 173–213.Google Scholar
Nespoulous, J.-L., Dordain, M., Perron, C., Ska, B., Bub, D., Caplan, D., Melher, J., Lecours, A. R. (1988). Agrammatism in sentence production without comprehension deficits: Reduced availability of syntactic structures andor of grammatical morphemes. A case study. Brain and Language, 33, 273–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nespoulous, J.-L.Lecours, A. R. (1987). Coprolalique chez le patient atteint du syndrome de Jule de la Tourette. Aspects formels et functionnels. Revue Neurologique, 143, 220–224.Google Scholar
Patterson, K., Vargha-Khadem, F., Polkey, C. E. (1989). Reading with one hemisphere. Brain, 112, 39–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poncet, M., Ali-Chrif, A., Joanette, Y., Nespoulous, J.-L. (1984). Reference and modalization in a left-hander with callosal disconnection and right hemianopia. In Caplan, D., Lec-ours, A. R., Smith, A. (eds.), Biological perspectives on language (pp. 255–263). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Puel, M., Dmonet, J.-F., Cardebat, D., Bonaf, A., Gazounaud, Y., Guiraud-Chaumeil, B., Rascol, A. (1986). Le rle du thalamus dans les aphasies sous-corticales. Revue Neurologique, 142, 431–440.Google Scholar
Ross, J. (1970). On declarative sentences. In Jacobs, R.Rosenbaum, P. (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn Co.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de. (1971). Cours de linguistique generate. Paris: Payot. (Original work published 1971).Google Scholar
Schwartz, M. F., Linebarger, M. C, Saffran, E. M., Pater, D. S. (1987). Syntactic transparency and sentence interpretation in aphasia. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Lancker, D. (1987). Nonpropositional speech: Neurolinguistic studies. In Ellis, A. W. (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 3, pp. 49–118). London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1993). Nonpropositional speech in aphasia. In Blanken, G.Dittmann, J., Grimm, H., Marshall, J. C., Wallesch, C.-W. (Eds.), Linguistic disorders and pathologies (pp. 215–225). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wallesch, C.-W., Papagno, C. (1988). Subcortical language. In Rose, F. C., Whurr, R., Wyke, M. A. (eds.), Aphasia (pp. 256–287). London: Whurr.Google Scholar
Yakovlev, P. I. (1968). Telencephalon impar, semipar and totopar. International Journal of Neurology, 6, 245–265.Google ScholarPubMed
Zipf, G. K. (1935). The psychobiology of language. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar