Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T07:21:59.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Foundations of early literacy among Arabic-speaking pre-school children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2021

Hanadi Abu Ahmad*
Affiliation:
Department of Learning Disabilities and the Edmond J. Safra Brain Research Center for the Study of Learning Disabilities, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel The Academic Arab College for Education in Israel-Haifa, Haifa, Israel
David L. Share
Affiliation:
Department of Learning Disabilities and the Edmond J. Safra Brain Research Center for the Study of Learning Disabilities, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
*
*Corresponding author. Email: hanadi.abuahmad@gmail.com

Abstract

The present study aimed to shed light on (i) the most accessible phonological unit and (ii) the nature of letter knowledge among native Arabic-speaking preschool children living in Israel. One hundred and sixty-seven children were assessed on phonological awareness with initial and final isolation tasks as well as knowledge of the standard names and sounds of Arabic letters. Children’s responses in these tasks were categorized in accordance with the phonological unit that the child supplied. Regarding phonological unit accessibility, the novel finding of this study was the prevalence of a tri-phonemic /ʔεC/ unit that begins with the prefix /ʔε-/ and ends with the target (consonantal) phoneme which we have termed the “demi-phoneme” (e.g., /ʔεs/ for the consonant /s/). Awareness of the consonant–vowel unit was the next most prevalent unit followed lastly by the “smallest unit” – the phoneme. It appears that the demi-phoneme functions as a psycholinguistic aid to facilitate phoneme perception and pronunciation (as proposed by the 8th-century scholar – Al-Khalil ibn Ahmad al-Farahidi) and both phoneme and demi-phoneme responses are underpinned by the same knowledge. With regard to letter knowledge, the standard name for Arabic letters was the preferred response and letter sounds were retrieved as a demi-phoneme unit.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ababneh, Y. (2000). Studies in the linguistics and phonology of Arabic [in Arabic]. Dar El-Shorook.Google Scholar
Abu Ahmad, H., Ibrahim, R., & Share, D. L. (2014). Cognitive predictors of early reading ability in Arabic: A longitudinal study from kindergarten to Grade 2. In Saiegh-Haddad, E. & Joshi, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic Literacy (pp. 171194). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu-Rabia, S., Share, D., & Mansour, M. A. (2003). Word recognition and basic cognitive processes among reading-disabled and normal readers in Arabic. Reading and Writing, 16, 423442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, M. J. (1991). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Al-Ghanem, R., & Kearns, D. (2014). Orthographic, phonological and morphological skills and children’s word reading in Arabic: A literature review. Reading Research Quarterly, 0(0), 127.Google Scholar
Al-Hmouz, H. (2013). The relationship between letter fluency measures and Arabic GPA (Grade Point Average). International Journal of Special Education, 28(3), 140149.Google Scholar
Al-Khalil ibn Ahmad al-Farahidi. (2003). Kitab al-Ayn [in Arabic]. Dar al-Kitab al-'Alamiyya.Google Scholar
Almusa, N. (2003). Dual issues on Arabic from the enlightenment period to the period of globalization [in Arabic]. Alshuruk Post.Google Scholar
Al-Shaieb, F. (2004). The impact of phonological rules in word’s structure [in Arabic]. Alam Al-kutub Al-hadeeth.Google Scholar
Asaad, H., & Eviatar, Z. (2013). The effects of orthographic complexity and diglossia on letter identification (naming or retrieval) in Arabic: Developmental changes. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 156168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asadi, I. A., Khateb, A., Ibrahim, R., & Taha, H. (2017). How do the different cognitive and linguistic factors contribute to reading in Arabic? A large scale developmental. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 30(9), 18351867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9755-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babayigit, S. & Stainthorp, R. (2011). Modeling the relationships between cognitive–linguistic skills and literacy skills: New insights from a transparent orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 169189. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, T. (1996) Arabic writing. In Daniels, P. T. & Bright, W.. (Eds.), The world’s writing systems (pp. 559563). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Besher, K. (1972). The sounds of Arabic language [in Arabic]. Mactabat Al-shabab.Google Scholar
Bowey, J. A. (2005). Grammatical sensitivity: Its origins and potential contribution to early word reading skill. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90, 318343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyer, N., & Ehri, L. C. (2011). Contribution of phonemic segmentation instruction with letters and articulation pictures to word reading and spelling in beginners. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(5), 440470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1989). Phonemic awareness and letter knowledge in the child’s acquisition of the alphabetic principle. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 805812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, J., Ibrahim, R., & Share, D. L. (2013). The influence of orthographic structure on printed word learning in Arabic. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 189213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, P. T. (1992). The syllabic origin of writing and the segmental origin of the alphabet. In Downing, P., Lima, S. D., & Noonan, M. (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (pp. 83110). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, P. T. (2018). An exploration of writing. Equinox Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Daniels, P. T., & Share, D. L. (2018). Writing system variation and its consequences for reading and dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(1), 101116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1379082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denckla, M., & Rudel, R. G. (1974). Rapid automatized naming of pictured objects, colors, letters and numbers by normal children. Cortex, 10, 186202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test—revised. American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (2005). Development of sight word reading: Phases and findings. Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. N., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 25287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elbeheri, G., & Everatt, J. (2007). Literacy ability and phonological processing skills amongst dyslexic and non-dyslexic speakers of Arabic. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 20, 273294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elbro, C., & Petersen, D. K. (2004). Long-term effects of phoneme awareness and letter sound training: An intervention study with children at risk for dyslexia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 660670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellefson, M. R., Treiman, R & Kessler, B. (2009). Learning to label letters by sounds or names: A comparison of England and the United States. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 323341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eviatar, Z., & Ibrahim, R. (2014). Why is hard to read Arabic?. In Saiegh-Haddad, E. & Joshi, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic Literacy (pp. 7796). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulin, J. N. (2005). Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18, 129155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, M. F. (1996). Test of visual-perceptual skills (Non-Motor). Health Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Geudens, A. & Sandra, D. (2003). Beyond implicit phonological knowledge: No support for an onset-rime structure in children’s explicit phonological awareness. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 157182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, L. R., & Rozin, P. (1973). Teaching reading by use of a syllabary. Reading Research Quarterly, 8, 447483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gombert, J. E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Gombert, J. E. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning to read: Implication as for subtypes of dyslexia. Current Psychology Letters: Behaviour, Brain & Cognition, 10(1), Special Issue on Language Disorders and Reading Acquisition.Google Scholar
Hende, N. (2012). Predicting second grade reading from kindergarten language and literacy in Arabic. Ph.D. Dissertation, Tel-Aviv University.Google Scholar
Holes, C. (2004). Modern Arabic: Structures, functions and varieties. Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Jorm, A. F., & Share, D. L. (1983). Phonological recoding and reading acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 4, 103147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karayani, M., Mousa, W., & Cohen, Y. (1976). Arabic adaptation of Wechsler intelligence scale for children. Hebrew University and Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Kim, Y., & Petscher, Y. (2011). Relations of emergent literacy skill development with conventional literacy skill development in Korean. Reading and Writing, 24, 635656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layes, S., Lalonde, R., & Rebai, M. (2019). Effects of an adaptive phonological training program on reading and phonological processing skills in Arabic-speaking children with dyslexia. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 35(2), 103117. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2018.1515049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, I., Saiegh-Haddad, E., Hende, N., & Ziv, M. (2008). Early literacy in Arabic: An intervention study among Israeli Palestinian kindergartners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 413436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., & Liberman, A. M. (1992). Whole language versus code emphasis: Underlying assumptions and their implications for reading instruction. In Gough, P. B., Ehri, L. C., & Treiman, R. (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 343366). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. W., & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonigan, C. J., Burgess, S. R., & Anthony, J. L. (2000). Development of emergent literacy and early reading skills in preschool children: Evidence from a latent-variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 36, 596613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McBride-Chang, C., Bialystok, E., Chong, K. K. Y., & Li, Y. (2004). Levels of phonological awareness in three cultures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89, 93111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 322352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ministry of Education. (2009). [in Arabic] [البنية الأساسية للقراءة والكتابة في اللغة العربيّة]. [Basic structure of reading and writing in Arabic language]. Jerusalem, Israel.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education. (2018). [in Arabic] [لغتنا العربية للصفّ الأوّل الأساسي]. [Our Arabic language for first grade]. Amman, Jordan.Google Scholar
Moll, K., Ramus, F., Bartling, J., Bruder, J., Kunze, S., Neuhoff, N., Streiftau, S., Lyytinen, H., Leppänen, P. H. T., Lohvansuu, K., Tóth, D., Honbolygó, F., Csépe, V., Bogliotti, C., Iannuzzi, S., Démonet, J. F., Longeras, E., Valdois, S., George, F., … Landerl, K. (2014). Cognitive mechanisms underlying reading and spelling development in five European orthographies. Learning and Instruction, 29, 6577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (Eds.). (2015). PIRLS 2016. Assessment framework (2nd ed.). TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2016/framework.html.Google Scholar
Nag, S & Narayanan, B. (2019). Orthographic knowledge, reading and spelling development in Tamil: The first three years. In Joshi, R. M. & McBride, C. (Eds.), Handbook of Literacy in Akshara Orthography, (pp.5583). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Early Literacy Panel (NELP). (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. National Institute for Literacy.Google Scholar
National Institute for Literacy. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the early literacy panel: A scientific synthesis of early literacy development and implications for intervention. National Institute for Literacy.Google Scholar
Norton, E., & Wolf, M. (2012). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 427452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
OECD (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework, PISA, OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en.Google Scholar
Pennington, B. F., & Lefly, D. L. (2001). Early reading development in children at family risk for dyslexia. Child Development, 72, 816833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
RAMA- Israeli National Authority for Measurement and Evaluation., & Ministry of Education. (2017). Teacher manual of reading and writing test for first grade [in Arabic]. Matah.Google Scholar
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Raven’s colored progressive matrices. Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Rickard Liow, S & Choo Lee, L. (2004). Metalinguistic awareness and semi-syllabic scripts: Children’s spelling errors in Malay. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2003). Linguistic distance and initial reading Acquisition: The case of Arabic diglossia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 431451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2004). The impact of phonemic and lexical distance on the phonological analysis of words and pseudowords in a diglossic context. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 495512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2005). Correlates of reading fluency in Arabic: Diglossic and orthographic factors. Reading and Writing, 18, 559582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2007a). Linguistic constraints on children’s ability to isolate phonemes in Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 605625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2018). MAWRID: A model of Arabic word reading in development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51, 454462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2019). What is phonological awareness in L2? Journal of Neurolinguistics, 50, 1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Henkin-Roitfarb, R. (2014). The structure of Arabic language and orthography. In Saiegh-Haddad, E. & Joshi, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy (pp. 328). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E., Levin, I., Hende, N., & Ziv, M. (2011). The linguistic affiliation constraint and phoneme recognition in diglossic Arabic. Journal of Child Language, 38(2), 297315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saiegh-Haddad, E., Shahbari-Kassem, A., & Schiff, R. (2020). Phonological awareness in Arabic: the role of phonological distance, phonological-unit size, and SES. Reading and Writing, 33(6), 16491674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10019-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Spolsky, B. (2014). Acquiring literacy in a diglossic context: Problems and prospects. In Saiegh-Haddad, E. & Joshi, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy, (pp. 225240). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Taha, H. (2017). The role of morphological and phonological awareness in the early development of word spelling and reading in typically developing and disabled Arabic readers. Dyslexia, 23, 345371. https://doi:10.1002/dys.1572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savin, H. B., & Bever, T. G. (1970). The non-perceptual reality of the phoneme. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 295302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Share, D. L. (2004). Knowing letter names and learning letter sounds: A causal connection. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 213233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Share, D. L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of over-reliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Share, D. L. (2017). Learning to read Hebrew. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. A. (Eds.), Reading acquisition: Crosslinguistic and cross-script perspectives, (pp. 155180). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (2021). Is the science of reading just the science of reading English?. Reading Research Quarterly. https://doi:10.1002/rrq.401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Share, D. L., & Bar-On, A. (2017). Learning to read a Semitic abjad: The triplex model of Hebrew reading development. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Advance online publication. https://doi:10.1177/0022219417718198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Share, D. L., & Blum, P. (2005). Syllable splitting in literate and preliterate Hebrew speakers: Onsets and rimes or bodies and codas? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 182202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Share, D. L., Jorm, A. F., Maclean, R., & Matthews, R. (1984). Sources of individual differences in reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 13091324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (2005). Learning to read with a language impairment. The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 397412). Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Tahan, S., Cline, T., & Messaoud-Galusi, S. (2011). The relationship between language dominance and pre-reading skills in young bilingual children in Egypt. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 24, 10611087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taibah, N. J., & Haynes, C. W. (2011). Contributions of phonological processing skills to reading skills in Arabic speaking children. Reading and Writing, 24(9), 10191042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tibi, S. (2010). Developmental hierarchy of Arabic phonological awareness skills. International Journal of Special Education, 25(1), 2733.Google Scholar
Tibi, S., & Kirby, J. R. (2018). Investigating phonological awareness and naming speed as predictors of reading in Arabic. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22, 7084. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1340948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tibi, S., & Kirby, J. R. (2019). Reading in Arabic: How well does the standard model apply? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62, 9931014. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaessen, A., & Blomert, L. (2013). The cognitive linkage and divergence of spelling and reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(2), 89107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.614665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. E. (2017). Learning to read across languages and writing systems. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Hecht, S. A., Barker, T. A., Burgess, S. R., Donahue, J., & Garon, T. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33, 468479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. A. (1974). Wechsler intelligence scale for children-revised. Psychological Corp.Google Scholar
Winskel, H., & Widjaja, V. (2007). Phonological awareness, letter knowledge, and literacy development in Indonesian beginner readers and spellers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 2345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed