Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:44:35.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feature-focusing constraints on implicit learning of function word and meaning associations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Theresa Pham Open the ORCID record for Theresa Pham [Opens in a new window] ,
Joel Hosung Kang ,
Alisha Johnson  and
Lisa M. D. Archibald
Theresa Pham*
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Joel Hosung Kang
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Alisha Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Lisa M. D. Archibald
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
*
*Corresponding author. Email: tpham62@uwo.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent research has begun to investigate implicit learning at the level of meaning. The general consensus is that implicitly linking a word with a meaning is constrained by existing linguistic knowledge. However, another factor to consider is the extent to which attention is drawn to the relevant meanings in implicit learning paradigms. We manipulated the presence of cue saliency during implicit rule learning for a grammatical form (i.e., articles) linked to meaning (i.e., animacy vs. varying notions of size). In a series of experiments, participants learned four novel words but did not know that article usage also depended on a hidden rule, creating an opportunity for implicit rule learning. We found implicit learning through the use of a highly salient meaning (Experiment 1) or if image size was made salient by being explicitly cued (Experiment 3), but not in a low salient paradigm for intrinsic object size (Experiment 2). The findings suggest that implicit learning of semantic information might not be as constrained as previously argued. Instead, implicit learning might be additionally influenced by feature-focusing cues that make the meaning contrasts more salient and thereby more readily available to learning.

Keywords

attentional cuescue saliencyform–meaning connectionsimplicit learningsemantic association
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , March 2020 , pp. 401 - 426
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akhtar, N., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). Joint attention and vocabulary development: A critical look. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 195–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00014.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, D. A. (1991). Infants’ contribution to the achievement of joint reference. Child Development, 62, 875–890. doi: 10.2307/1131140CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batterink, L. J., Oudiette, D., Reber, P. J., & Paller, K. A. (2014). Sleep facilitates learning a new linguistic rule. Neruopsychologia, 65, 169–179. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, W., Guo, X., Tang, J., Zhu, L., Yang, Z., & Dienes, Z. (2011). Unconscious structural knowledge of form–meaning connections. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1751–1760. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.03.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culbertson, J., Gagliardi, A., & Smith, K. (2017). Competition between phonological and semantic cues in noun class learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 343–358. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faretta-Stutenberg, M., & Morgan-Short, K. (2011). Learning without awareness reconsidered: A replication of Williams (2005). In Granena, G., Koeth, J., Lee-Ellis, S., Lukyanchenko, A, Prieto Botana, G., & Rhoades, E. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2010 Second Language Research Forum: Reconsidering SLA research, dimensions, and directions (pp. 18–28). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Ferreira, F., Ferraro, V., & Bailey, K. G. D. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 11–15. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, L. (1990). The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition, 1, 3–55. doi: 10.1207/s15327817la0101_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hama, M., & Leow, R. P. (2010). Learning without awareness revisited: Extending Williams (2005). Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 465–491. doi: 10.1017/S0272263110000045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffreys, H. (1998). The theory of probability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kerz, E., Wiechmann, D., & Riedel, F. (2017). Implicit learning in the crowd: Investigating the role of awareness in the acquisition of L2 knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 711–734. doi: 10.1017/S027226311700002XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchner, H., & Thorpe, S. (2006). Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: Visual processing speed revisited. Visual Research, 46, 1762–1776. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.002Google ScholarPubMed
Landau, B., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S. (1988). The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cognitive Development, 3, 299–321. doi: 10.1016/0885-2014(88)90014-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, J. H. C., & Williams, J. N. (2011). The implicit learning of mappings between forms and contextually-derived meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 33–55. doi: 10.1017/S0272263110000525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, J. H. C., & Williams, J. N. (2012). Constraints on implicit learning of grammatical form-meaning connections. Language Learning, 62, 634–662. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00637.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, J. H. C., & Williams, J. N. (2014). Crosslinguistic differences in implicit learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 733–755. doi: 10.1017/S0272263114000333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, F. F., VanRullen, R., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2002). Rapid natural scene categorisation in the near absence of attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 9596–9601. doi: 10.1073/pnas.092277599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markman, E. M. (1990). Constraints children place on word meanings. Cognitive Science, 14, 57–77. doi: 10.1016/0364-0213(90)90026-SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misyak, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., & Tomblin, J. B. (2010). On-line individual differences in statistical learning predict language processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 31. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00031CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peirce, J. W., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M. R., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., … Lindeløv, J. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 195–203. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plante, E., Ogilvie, T., Vance, R., Aguilar, J. M., Dailey, N. S., Meyers, C., … Burton, R. (2014). Variability in the language input to children enhances learning in a treatment context. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23, 530–545. doi: 10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13-0038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P., Hamrick, P., Riestenberg, K., Sachs, R., & Ziegler, N. (2015). Triangulating measures of awareness: A contribution to the debate on learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 299–334. doi: 10.1017/S0272263115000145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926–1928. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5294.1926CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 606–621. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.0032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime: User’s guide. Sharpsburg, PA: Psychology Software Incorporated.Google Scholar
Smith, L., & Yu, C. (2008). Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situational statistics. Cognition, 106, 1558–1568. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. (2000). The social-pragmatic theory of word learning. Pragmatics, 10, 401–413. doi: 10.1075/prag.10.4.01tomCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., & Barton, M. (1994). Learning words in non-ostensive contexts. Developmental Psychology, 30, 639–650. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.30.5.639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turke-Browne, N., Junge, J. A., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 552–564. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R. B., Borsboom, D., & van der Maas, H. L. (2011). Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem (2011). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 426–432. doi: 10.1037/a0022790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. N. (2005). Learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 269–304. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2005.04.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, C., & Smith, L. (2007). Rapid word learning under uncertainty via cross-situational statistics. Psychological Science, 18, 414–420. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01915.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed