Skip to main content Accessibility help

Abstract knowledge of word order by 19 months: An eye-tracking study



Word order is one of the earliest aspects of grammar that the child acquires, because her early utterances already respect the basic word order of the target language. However, the question of the nature of early syntactic representations is subject to debate. Approaches inspired by formal syntax assume that the head–complement order, differentiating verb–object and object–verb languages, is represented very early on in an abstract, rulelike format. In contrast, constructivist theories assume that it is initially encoded as lexicalized, verb-specific knowledge. In order to address this issue experimentally, we combined the preferential looking paradigm using pseudoverbs with the weird word order paradigm adapted to comprehension. The results, based on highly reliable, coder-independent eye-tracking measures, provide the first direct evidence that as early as 19 months French-speaking infants have an abstract representation of the word order of their language.


Corresponding author

ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Julie Franck, Laboratoire de psycholinguistique, Université de Genève, FAPSE, 40, Boulevard du Pont d'Arve, Geneva 1205, Switzerland. E-mail:


Hide All
Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2001). What pre-school children do and do not do with ungrammatical word orders. Cognitive Development, 16, 679692.
Akhtar, N. (1999). Acquiring basic word order: Evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure. Journal of Child Language, 26, 339356.
Akhtar, N., & Tomasello, M. (1997). Young children's productivity with word order and verb morphology. Developmental Psychology, 33, 952965.
Bavin, E. L., & Growcott, C. (1999). Infants of 24–30 months understand verb frames. In Perkins, M. & Howard, S. (Eds.), New directions in language development and disorders (pp. 169177). New York: Kluwer.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Christophe, A., Nespor, M., Guasti, M. T., & van Ooyen, B. (2003). Prosodic structure and syntactic acquisition: The case of the head–complement parameter. Developmental Science, 6, 213222.
Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Young German children's early syntactic competence: A preferential looking study. Developmental Science, 11, 575582.
Fernald, A., Zangl, R., Portillo, A. L., & Marchman, V. A. (2008). Looking while listening: Using eye movements to monitor spoken language comprehension by infants and young children. In Sekerina, I. A., Fernandez, E. M., & Clahsen, H. (Eds.), Developmental psycholinguistics: On-line methods in children's language processing (pp. 97135). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fernandes, K. J., Marcus, G. F., Di Nubila, J. A., & Vouloumanos, A. (2006). From semantics to syntax and back again: Argument structure in the third year of life. Cognition, 100, B10B20.
Franck, J., Millotte, S., & Lassotta, R. (in press). Early word order representations: Novel arguments against old contradictions. Language Acquisition.
Gertner, Y., Fisher, C., & Eisengart, J. (2006). Learning words and rules: Abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension. Psychological Science, 17, 684691.
Gervain, J., Nespor, M., Mazuka, R., Horie, R., & Mehler, J. (2008). Bootstrapping word order in prelexical infants: A Japanese–Italian cross-linguistic study. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 5674.
Greenberg, J. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, J. (Ed.), Universals of language (pp. 73113). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hirsh-Pasek, K. R., & Golinkoff, R. M. (1996). The origins of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kern, S. (2003). Le compte-rendu parental au service de l'évaluation de la production lexical des enfants français entre 16 et 30 mois. Glossa, 80, 4861.
Kidd, E., Bavin, E., & Rhodes, B. (2001). Two year-olds’ knowledge of verbs and argument structures. In Almgren, M., Barreña, A., Ezeizabarrena, M.-J., Idiazabal, I., & MacWhinney, B. (Eds.), Research on child language acquisition (pp. 13681382). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Langus, A., & Nespor, M. (2010). Cognitive systems struggling for word order. Cognitive Psychology, 60, 291318.
Lidz, J., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L. (2001). Kidz in the Hood: Syntactic bootstrapping and the mental lexicon (IRCS Technical Reports Series). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighbourhood activation model. Ear & Hearing, 19, 136.
Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2005). The role of frequency in the acquisition of English word order. Cognitive Development, 20, 121136.
Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2007). French children's use and correction of weird word orders: A constructivist account. Journal of Child Language, 32, 381409.
Naigles, L. (1990). Children use syntax to learn verb meanings. Journal of Child Language, 17, 357374.
Naigles, L. (1996). The use of multiple frames in verb learning via syntactic bootstrapping. Cognition, 58, 221251.
Naigles, L., & Kako, E. (1993). First contact: Biases in verb learning with and without syntactic information. Child Development, 64, 16651687.
New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., & Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE. L'Année Psychologique, 101, 447462.
Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
Rizzi, L. (2006). Grammatically-based target-inconsistencies in child language. University of Connecticut Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 4, 1949.
Tomasello, M. (1998). Response to commentators. Journal of Child Language, 25, 485491.
Tomasello, M. (2000). Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition, 74, 209253.
Tomlin, R. S. (1986). Basic word order: Functional principles. London: Croom Helm.
Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 106, 2379.


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed