Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-78dcdb465f-8p2q5 Total loading time: 18.816 Render date: 2021-04-20T07:42:23.655Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Are orthographic effects language specific? The influence of second language orthography on second language phoneme awareness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

CAROLYN PYTLYK
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

This research investigated first language (L1) and second language (L2) orthographic effects on L2 phoneme perception. Twenty-five native English learners of Russian (n = 13) and Mandarin (n = 12) participated in an auditory phoneme counting task, using stimuli organized along two parameters: consistency and homophony. The learners more successfully counted phonemes in L2 words with consistent letter–phoneme correspondences (e.g., всё /fsʲɔ/, three letters/three phonemes) than in words with inconsistent correspondences (e.g., звать /zvatʲ/, five letters/four phonemes), indicating that L2 phoneme awareness is influenced by L2 orthography and that orthographic effects are not limited to the L1. In addition, the lack of any L1 homophone effects suggests that L2 orthographic effects overrode any potential L1 orthographic interference for these intermediate-level learners, suggesting orthographic effects may be language specific.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Archibald, J. (1998). Second language phonology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassetti, B. (2006). Orthographic input and phonological representations in learners of Chinese as a foreign language. Written Language and Literacy, 9, 95114.Google Scholar
Bassetti, B., & Atkinson, N. (2015). Effects of orthographic forms on pronunciation in experienced instructed second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 6791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Dror, I., Frost, R., & Bentin, S. (1995). Orthographic representation and phonemic segmentation in skilled readers: A cross-language comparison. Psychological Science, 6, 176181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertelson, P., de Gelder, B., Tfouni, L. V., & Morais, J. (1989). Metaphonological abilities of adult illiterates: New evidence of heterogeneity. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1, 239250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, D. K. (1986). Developmental loss of speech perception: Exposure to and experience with a first language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7, 207240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, D. K. (2003). Language specific speech perception and the onset of reading. Reading and Writing, 16, 573609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrasco-Ortiz, H., Midgley, K. J., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2012). Are phonological representations in bilinguals language-specific? An ERP study on interlingual homophones. Psychophysiology, 49, 531543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, J. M. (2004). Letter knowledge precipitates phoneme segmentation, but not phoneme invariance. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 212225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, A., Holmes, V. M., Neath, J., & Kinoshita, S. (2003). How does orthographic knowledge influence performance on phonological awareness tasks? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 56, 445467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castro-Caldas, A., Petersson, K. M., Reis, A., Stone-Elander, S., & Ingvar, M. (1998). The illiterate brain: Learning to read and write during childhood influences the functional organization of the adult brain. Brain, 121, 10531063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chéreau, C., Gaskell, M. G., & Dumay, N. (2007). Reading spoken words: Orthographic effects in auditory priming. Cognition, 102, 341360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, H. (1999). Improving phonological awareness and word reading in a later learned alphabetic script. Cognition, 70, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, H., & Chen, H. C. (2004). Early orthographic experience modifies both phonological awareness and on-line speech processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. (2004). The English writing system. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Cook, V., & Bassetti, B. (2005). An introduction to researching second language writing systems. In Cook, V. & Bassetti, B. (Eds.), Second language writing systems (pp. 167). Toronto: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cossu, G., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I. Y., Tola, G., & Katz, L. (1988). Awareness of phonological segments and reading ability in Italian children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, F. (2003). Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coutsougera, P. (2007). The impact of orthography on the acquisition of L2 phonology: Inferring the wrong phonology from print. Paper presented at the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference 2007, University College London, August 24–26.Google Scholar
Danielsson, K. (2003). The relationship between grapheme-phoneme correspondences and reading errors in Swedish beginners’ oral reading. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47, 511528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, B. L. (1992). Orthographic aspects of linguistic competence. In Downing, P., Lima, S. D., & Noonan, M. (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (pp. 193210). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. (1999). Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 496518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T., Roelofs, A., & Fieuws, S. (1995). Orthographic effects on phonemic monitoring. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 264271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T., van Jaarsveld, H., & ten Brinke, S. (1998). Interlingual homograph recognition: Effects of task demands and language intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 5166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (1985). Effects of printed language acquisition on speech. In Olsen, D., Torrence, N., & Hildyard, A. (Eds.), Literacy, language, and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp. 333367). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1980). The influence of orthography on readers’ conceptualization of the phonemic structure of words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 371385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N., Natsume, M., Stavropoulou, K., Hoxhallari, L., Van Daal, V. H. P., Polyzoe, N., et al. (2004). The effects of orthographic depth on learning to read alphabetic, syllabic, and logographic scripts. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 438468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdener, V. D., & Burnham, D. K. (2005). The role of audiovisual speech and orthographic information in nonnative speech production. Language Learning, 55, 191228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frith, U. (1998). Editorial: Literally changing the brain. Brain, 121, 10111012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, R., & Katz, L. (1989). Orthographic depth and the interaction of visual and auditory processing in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 17, 302310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gombert, J. E. (1996). What do children do when they fail to count phonemes? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 19, 757772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, U. (1999). The relationship between phonological awareness and orthographic representation in different orthographies. In Harris, M. & Hatano, G. (Eds.), Learning to read and writing: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 134156). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goswami, U., Gombert, J. E., & De Barrera, L. F. (1998). Children's orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French, and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, U., Porpodas, C., & Wheelwright, S. (1997). Children's orthographic representations in English and Greek. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12, 273292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L. (2006). If John were Ivan, would he fail in reading? In Malatesha Joshi, M. & Aaron, P. G. (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 303320). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Haigh, C., & Jared, D. (2007). The activation of phonological representations by bilinguals while reading silently: Evidence from interlingual homophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 623644.Google Scholar
Hallé, P. A., Chéreau, C., & Segui, J. (2000). Where is the /b/ in “absurde” [apsyrd]? It is in French listeners’ minds. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 618639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R., Nicol, J., & Barker, J. (2010). Learning the phonological forms of new words: Effects of orthographic and auditory input. Language and Speech, 53, 367381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holm, A., & Dodd, B. (1996). The effect of first written language on the acquisition of English literacy. Cognition, 59, 119147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies. In Katz, L. & Frost, R. (Eds.), Advances in Psychology: Vol. 94. Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 6784). New York: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerek, E., & Niemi, P. (2009). Russian orthography and learning to read. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21, 121.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K. (2000). A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 1185011857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landerl, K., Frith, U., & Wimmer, H. (1996). Intrusion of orthographic knowledge on phoneme awareness: Strong in normal readers, weak in dyslexic readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, I., & Peterson, G. E. (1961). Transitions, glides, and diphthongs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33, 268277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., & Dijkstra, T. (2004). Recognizing cognates and interlingual homographs: Effects of code similarity in language-specific and generalized lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 32, 533550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liberman, I. Y., Liberman, A. M., Mattingly, I. G., & Shankweiler, D. L. (1980). Orthography and the beginning reader. In Kavanagh, J. & Venezky, R. (Eds.), Orthography, reading and dyslexia (pp. 137153). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. F. W., & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, R. (2001). Foreign accent: The ontogeny and phylogeny of second language phonology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mann, V. A. (1986). Phonological awareness: The role of reading experience. Cognition, 24, 6592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morais, J. (1991). Constraints on the development of phonemic awareness. In Brady, S. A. & Shankweiler, D. P. (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 527). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Morais, J., Bertelson, P., Cary, L., & Alegria, J. (1986). Literacy training and speech segmentation. Cognition, 24, 4564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegria, J., & Bertelson, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognition, 7, 323331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. R. (1996). Towards a psychology of literacy: On the relations between speech and writing. Cognition, 60, 83104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Öney, B., & Durgunoğlu, A. (1997). Beginning to read in Turkish: A phonologically transparent orthography. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öney, B., & Goldman, S. (1984). Decoding and comprehension skills in Turkish and English: Effects of the regularity of grapheme–phoneme correspondences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 557568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peereman, R., Dufour, S., & Burt, J. S. (2009). Orthographic influences in spoken word recognition: The consistency effect in semantic and gender categorization tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 363368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perin, D. (1983). Phonemic segmentation and spelling. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 129144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perre, L., Pattamadilok, C., Montant, M., & Ziegler, J. C. (2009). Orthographic effects in spoken language: On-line activation phonological restructuring? Brain Research, 1275, 7380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perre, L., & Ziegler, J. C. (2008). On-line activation of orthography in spoken word recognition. Brain Research, 1188, 132138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pytlyk, C. (2012). Expanding the scope of orthographic effects: Evidence from phoneme counting in first, second, and unfamiliar languages. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Victoria.Google Scholar
Read, C., Zhang, Y. F., Nie, H. Y., & Ding, B. Q. (1986). The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic writing. Cognition, 24, 3144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, H. (2000). The sounds of language: An introduction to phonetics. Essex: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E., Kogan, N., & Walters, J. (2010). Universal and language-specific constraints on phonemic awareness: Evidence from Russian–Hebrew bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 23, 359384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulpen, B., Dijkstra, T., Schriefers, H. J., & Hasper, M. (2003). Recognition of interlingual homophones in bilingual auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 11551178.Google ScholarPubMed
Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spencer, L. H., & Hanley, J. R. (2003). Effects of orthographic transparency on reading and phoneme awareness in children learning to read in Wales. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, G. O., Vanhoy, M., & Van Orden, G. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 337359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun-Alperin, M. K., & Wang, M. (2011). Cross-language transfer of phonological and orthographic processing skills from Spanish L1 to English L2. Reading and Writing, 24, 591614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taft, M., Castles, A., Davis, C., Lazendic, G., & Nguyen-Hoan, M. (2008). Automatic activation of orthography in spoken word recognition: Pseudohomograph priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 366379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R., & Cassar, M. (1997). Can children and adults focus on sound as opposed to spelling in a phoneme counting task? Developmental Psychology, 33, 771780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vokic, G. (2011). When alphabets collide: Alphabetic first-language speakers’ approach to speech production in an alphabetic second language. Second Language Research, 27, 391417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade-Woolley, L. (1999). First language influences on second language word reading: All roads lead to Rome. Language Learning, 49, 447471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, M., Park, Y., & Lee, K. (2006). Korean-English biliteracy acquisition: Cross language and orthographic transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 148158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, M., Perfetti, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2005). Chinese-English biliteracy acquisition: Cross language writing system transfer. Cognition, 97, 6788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yopp, H. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 159177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., & Ferrand, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 683689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Ferrand, L., & Montant, M. (2004). Visual phonology: The effects of orthographic consistency on different auditory word recognition tasks. Memory & Cognition, 32, 732741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Muneaux, M., & Grainger, J. (2003). Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 779793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 67
Total number of PDF views: 445 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Are orthographic effects language specific? The influence of second language orthography on second language phoneme awareness
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Are orthographic effects language specific? The influence of second language orthography on second language phoneme awareness
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Are orthographic effects language specific? The influence of second language orthography on second language phoneme awareness
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *