Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

OPTIMAL TIME-CONSISTENT PORTFOLIO AND CONTRIBUTION SELECTION FOR DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION SCHEMES UNDER MEAN–VARIANCE CRITERION

  • XIAOQING LIANG (a1), LIHUA BAI (a1) and JUNYI GUO (a1)

Abstract

We investigate two mean–variance optimization problems for a single cohort of workers in an accumulation phase of a defined benefit pension scheme. Since the mortality intensity evolves as a general Markov diffusion process, the liability is random. The fund manager aims to cover this uncertain liability via controlling the asset allocation strategy and the contribution rate. In order to have a more realistic model, we study the case when the risk aversion depends dynamically on current wealth. By solving an extended Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman system, we obtain analytical solutions for the equilibrium strategies and value function which depend on both current wealth and mortality intensity. Moreover, results for the constant risk aversion are presented as special cases of our models.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      OPTIMAL TIME-CONSISTENT PORTFOLIO AND CONTRIBUTION SELECTION FOR DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION SCHEMES UNDER MEAN–VARIANCE CRITERION
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      OPTIMAL TIME-CONSISTENT PORTFOLIO AND CONTRIBUTION SELECTION FOR DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION SCHEMES UNDER MEAN–VARIANCE CRITERION
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      OPTIMAL TIME-CONSISTENT PORTFOLIO AND CONTRIBUTION SELECTION FOR DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION SCHEMES UNDER MEAN–VARIANCE CRITERION
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
[1]Björk, T. and Murgoci, A., “A general theory of Markovian time inconsistent stochastic control problems”, SSRN eLibrary, 2010; doi:10.2139/ssrn.1694759.
[2]Björk, T., Murgoci, A. and Zhou, X. Y., “Mean-variance portfolio optimization with state-dependent risk aversion”, Math. Finance 24 (2012) 124; doi:10.1111/j.1467-9965.2011.00515.x.
[3]Cairns, A. J., “Some notes on the dynamics and optimal control of stochastic pension fund models in continuous time”, Astin Bull. 30 (2000) 1956; doi:10.2143/AST.30.1.504625.
[4]Delong, Ł., Gerrard, R. and Haberman, S., “Mean–variance optimization problems for an accumulation phase in a defined benefit plan”, Insurance Math. Econom. 42 (2008) 107118 ; doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.01.005.
[5]He, L. and Liang, Z., “Optimal investment strategy for the DC plan with the return of premiums clauses in a mean–variance framework”, Insurance Math. Econom. 53 (2013) 643649 ; doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.09.002.
[6]Heath, D. and Schweizer, M., “Martingales versus PDEs in finance: an equivalence result with examples”, J. Appl. Probab. 37 (2000) 947957; doi:10.1239/jap/1014843075.
[7]Hu, Y., Jin, H. and Zhou, X. Y., “Time-inconsistent stochastic linear–quadratic control”, SIAM J. Control Optim. 50 (2012) 15481572; doi:10.1137/110853960.
[8]Jalen, L. and Mamon., R., “Valuation of contingent claims with mortality and interest rate risks”, Math. Comput. Modelling 49 (2009) 18931904; doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2008.10.014.
[9]Josa-Fombellida, R. and Rincón-Zapatero, J. P., “Optimal risk management in defined benefit stochastic pension funds”, Insurance Math. Econom. 34 (2004) 489503 ; doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2004.03.002.
[10]Josa-Fombellida, R. and Rincón-Zapatero, J. P., “Mean–variance portfolio and contribution selection in stochastic pension funding”, European J. Oper. Res. 187 (2008) 120137 ; doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.03.002.
[11]Josa-Fombellida, R. and Rincón-Zapatero, J. P., “Stochastic pension funding when the benefit and the risky asset follow jump diffusion processes”, European J. Oper. Res. 220 (2012) 404413 ; doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.033.
[12]Li, D. and Ng, W.-L., “Optimal dynamic portfolio selection: multiperiod mean–variance formulation”, Math. Finance 10 (2000) 387406; doi:10.1111/1467-9965.00100.
[13]Li, Y. and Li, Z., “Optimal time-consistent investment and reinsurance strategies for mean–variance insurers with state dependent risk aversion”, Insurance Math. Econom. 53 (2013) 8697 ; doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.03.008.
[14]Markowitz, H., “Portfolio selection”, J. Finance 7 (1952) 7791 ; doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x.
[15]Ngwira, B. and Gerrard, R., “Stochastic pension fund control in the presence of Poisson jumps”, Insurance Math. Econom. 40 (2007) 283292; doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2006.05.002.
[16]Qian, L., Wang, W., Wang, R. and Tang, Y., “Valuation of equity-indexed annuity under stochastic mortality and interest rate”, Insurance Math. Econom. 47 (2010) 123129 ; doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2010.06.005.
[17]Strotz, R. H., “Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization”, Rev. Econ. Stud. 23 (1955) 165180; doi:10.2307/2295722.
[18]Zeng, Y. and Li, Z., “Optimal time-consistent investment and reinsurance policies for mean-variance insurers”, Insurance Math. Econom. 49 (2011) 145154; doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2011.01.001.
[19]Zeng, Y., Li, Z. and Lai, Y., “Time-consistent investment and reinsurance strategies for mean–variance insurers with jumps”, Insurance Math. Econom. 52 (2013) 498507 ; doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.02.007.
[20]Zhou, X. Y. and Li, D., “Continuous-time mean-variance portfolio selection: a stochastic LQ framework”, Appl. Math. Optim. 42 (2000) 1933; doi:10.1007/s002450010003.
MathJax
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see http://www.mathjax.org.

Keywords

MSC classification

OPTIMAL TIME-CONSISTENT PORTFOLIO AND CONTRIBUTION SELECTION FOR DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION SCHEMES UNDER MEAN–VARIANCE CRITERION

  • XIAOQING LIANG (a1), LIHUA BAI (a1) and JUNYI GUO (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed