Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T09:02:39.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Settlement change on the western Konya Plain: refining Neolithic and Chalcolithic chronologies at Canhasan, Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2020

Andrew Fairbairn*
Affiliation:
School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Australia
Piotr Jacobsson
Affiliation:
Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, University of Glasgow, UK
Douglas Baird
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, University of Liverpool, UK
Geraldine Jacobsen
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Sydney, Australia
Elizabeth Stroud
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, UK
*
*Author for correspondence: ✉ a.fairbairn@uq.edu.au

Abstract

The Konya Plain in western Turkey hosted some of the earliest known farming communities beyond the Fertile Crescent. While robust radiocarbon chronologies have elucidated the development of local Neolithic settlement patterns, particularly for Çatalhöyük, the history of occupation at Canhasan sites III and I to the south-east is less clear. Here, the authors present new radiocarbon dates for these sites, demonstrating that these settlements align closely with the occupation sequence to the north. Aceramic Neolithic occupation at Canhasan III further emphasises Çatalhöyük East's isolation for most of the Ceramic Neolithic, while Canhasan I was reoccupied during a phase of dispersed settlement.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ataman, K. 1988. Chipped stone assemblage from Can Hasan III: a study in typology, technology and function. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of London.Google Scholar
Baird, D. 2006. The history of settlement and social landscapes in the Early Holocene in the Çatalhöyük area, in Hodder, I. (ed.) Çatalhöyük perspectives: themes from the 1995–99 seasons: 5574. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Baird, D. 2010. Was Çatalhöyük a centre? The implications of a Late Aceramic Neolithic assemblage from the neighbourhood of Çatalhöyük, in Bolger, D. & Maguire, L.C. (ed.) Development of pre-state communities in the ancient Near East: 207–16. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Baird, D. 2012. The Late Epipalaeolithic, Neolithic and Chalcolithic of the Anatolian Plateau, 13 000–4000 BC calibrated, in Potts, D.T. (ed.) Blackwell's companion to Near Eastern archaeology: 431–65. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, D., Carruthers, D., Fairbairn, A. & Pearson, J.. 2011. Ritual in the landscape: evidence from Pınarbaşı in the seventh-millennium cal BC Konya Plain. Antiquity 85: 380–94. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X0006782XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, D., Fairbairn, A., Martin, L. & Middleton, C.. 2012. The Boncuklu project: the origins of sedentism, cultivation and herding in Central Anatolia, in Özdoğan, M. & Başgelen, N. (ed.) The Neolithic in Turkey: new excavations, new discoveries: 219–44. Istanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat.Google Scholar
Baird, D. et al. 2013. Juniper smoke, skulls and wolves’ tails: the Epipalaeolithic of the Anatolian plateau in its SW Asian context; insights from Pınarbaşı. Levant 45: 175210. https://doi.org/10.1179/0075891413Z.00000000024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, D. et al. 2018. Agricultural origins on the Anatolian plateau. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 115: E307786. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800163115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, H. & Mackey, C.. 1968. British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements V. Radiocarbon 10: 17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200019883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayliss, A., Brock, F., Farid, S., Hodder, I., Southon, J. & Taylor, R.E.. 2015. Getting to the bottom of it all: a Bayesian approach to dating the start of Çatalhöyük. Journal of World Prehistory 28: 126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10963-015-9083-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaauw, M. 2010. Methods and code for ‘classical’ age-modelling of radiocarbon sequences. Quaternary Geochronology 5: 512–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2010.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogaard, A., Filipović, D., Fairbairn, A., Green, L., Stroud, E., Fuller, D. & Charles, M.. 2017. Agricultural innovation and resilience in a long-lived early farming community: the 1500-year sequence at Neolithic to Early Chalcolithic Çatalhöyük, Central Anatolia. Anatolian Studies 67: 128. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0066154617000072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, S.E., Ambers, J.C. & Leese, M.N.. 1990. Re-evaluation of British Museum radiocarbon dates issued between 1980 and 1984. Radiocarbon 32: 5979. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200039953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009a. Dealing with outliers and offsets in radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 51: 1023–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200034093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009b. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51: 337–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200033865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2017. Methods for summarizing radiocarbon datasets. Radiocarbon 59: 1809–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2017.108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burleigh, R., Matthews, K. & Ambers, J.. 1982. British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements XIV. Radiocarbon 24: 229–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200005142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, T. & Milić, M.. 2013. The consumption of obsidian at Neolithic Çatalhöyük: a long-term perspective, in Borrell, F., Ibáñez, J.J. & Molist, M.M. (ed.) Stone tools in transition: from hunter-gatherers to farming societies in the Near East: 495508. Barcelona: Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Carter, T., Conolly, J. & Spasojević, A.. 2005. The chipped stone: part I, in Hodder, I. (ed.) Changing materialities at Çatalhöyük: reports from the 1995–1999 seasons: 221–83. Cambridge & Ankara: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research & British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.Google Scholar
Cessford, C. 2005. Absolute dating at Çatalhöyük, in Hodder, I. (ed.) Changing materialities at Çatalhöyük: reports from the 1995–1999 seasons: 6599. Cambridge & Ankara: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research & British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.Google Scholar
Ergin, M. 1979. The Hacettepe University Radiocarbon Laboratory and chronological prospection of the archaeological sites in Turkey. Chimica Acta Turcica 7: 3138.Google Scholar
Farid, S. 2013. Timelines: phasing Neolithic Çatalhöyük, in Hodder, I. (ed.) Çatalhöyük excavations: 91130. Ankara: British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.Google Scholar
Fairbairn, A. 2005. A history of agriculture at Çatalhöyük East, Turkey. World Archaeology 37: 197210. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240500094762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbairn, A., Jenkins, E., Baird, D. & Jacobsen, G.. 2014. Ninth millennium plant subsistence in the Central Anatolian highlands: new evidence from Pınarbaşı, Karaman Province, Central Anatolia. Journal of Archaeological Science 41: 801–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.09.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, D.H. 1972. Excavations at Can Hasan III 1969–1970, in Higgs, E.S. (ed.) Papers in economic prehistory: 181–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
French, D.H. 1998. Canhasan sites 1: Canhasan I, stratigraphy and structures. Ankara: British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.Google Scholar
French, D.H. 2005. Canhasan sites 2: Canhasan I, the pottery. Ankara: British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.Google Scholar
Gillespie, R., Gowlett, J.A.J., Hall, E.T., Hedges, R.M. & Perry, C.. 1985. Radiocarbon dates from the Oxford AMS system: archaeometry datelist 2. Archaeometry 27: 237–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.1985.tb00367.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. 2014. Social and settlement organisation, in Hodder, I. (ed.) Integrating Çatalhöyük: themes from the 2000–2008 seasons. Ankara: British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.Google Scholar
Marciniak, A., Barański, Z.M., Bayliss, A., Czerniak, L., Goslar, T., Southon, J. & Taylor, R.E.. 2015. Fragmenting times: interpreting a Bayesian chronology for the late Neolithic occupation of Çatalhöyük East, Turkey. Antiquity 89: 154–76. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2014.33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orton, D., Anvari, J., Gibson, C., Last, J., Bogaard, A., Rosenstock, E. & Biehl, P.F.. 2018. A tale of two tells: dating the Çatalhöyük West Mound. Antiquity 92: 620–39. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2018.91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özdöl-Kutlu, S., Carter, T., Czerniak, L. & Marciniak, A.. 2015. The end of the Neolithic settlement, in Hodder, I. & Marciniak, A. (ed.) Assembling Çatalhöyük: 179–95. London: Maney.Google Scholar
Reimer, P.J. et al. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50 000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55: 1869–87. https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, N. & Rosen, A.. 2009. Diversity and complexity in early farming communities of South-west Asia: new insights into the economic and environmental basis of Neolithic Çatalhöyük. Current Anthropology 50: 393402. https://doi.org/10.1086/598606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, N. et al. 2016. A tale of two lakes: a multi-proxy comparison of Late Glacial and Holocene environmental change in Cappadocia, Turkey. Journal of Quaternary Science 31: 348–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.2852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roffet-Salque, M., Marciniak, A., Valdes, P.J., Pawłowska, K., Pyzel, J., Czerniak, L., Krüger, M., Roberts, C.N., Pitter, S. & Evershed, R.P.. 2018. Evidence for the impact of the 8.2-ky BP climate event on Near Eastern early farmers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 115: 8705–709. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803607115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuckenrath, R. & Ralph, E.K.. 1965. University of Pennsylvania radiocarbon dates VIII. Radiocarbon 7: 187–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200037188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thissen, L. 2002. Appendix 1. CANEW 14C databases and 14C charts: Central Anatolia and Cilicia, in Gerard, F. & Thissen, L. (ed.) The Neolithic of Central Anatolia: 299335. Istanbul: Ege Yayınları.Google Scholar
Wainwright, J. & Ayala, G.. 2019. Teleconnections and environmental determinism: was there really a climate driven collapse at Late Neolithic Çatalhöyük. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 116: 3343–44. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1818336116CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watkins, T. 1996. Excavations at Pınarbaşı: the early stages, in Hodder, I. (ed.) On the surface: Çatalhöyük 1993–95 (Çatalhöyük Research Project 1): 47–58. Cambridge & London: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research & British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.Google Scholar
Wicks, K., Finlayson, B., Maričević, D., Smith, S., Jenkins, E. & Mithen, S.. 2016. Dating WF16: exploring the chronology of a Pre-Pottery Neolithic A settlement in the southern Levant. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 82: 73123. https://doi.org/10.1017/ppr.2015.21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yalman, N., Özbudak, D.T. & Gültekin, H.. 2013. The Neolithic pottery of Çatalhöyük: recent studies, in Hodder, I. (ed.) Substantive technologies at Çatalhöyük: 147–82. Ankara: British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Fairbairn et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S4

Download Fairbairn et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 562.9 KB