Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:15:39.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A ground-radar view of Japanese burial mounds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Dean Goodman  and
Yasushi Nishimura
Dean Goodman
Affiliation:
Geophysical Archaeometry Laboratory, University of Miami Japan Division, Otsubu 39-1, Nakajima Machi, Ishikawa Ken, 929-22, Japan
Yasushi Nishimura
Affiliation:
Archaeological Operations, Nara National Cultural Properties Research Institute 9-1, 2 chome Nijocho, Nara-shi 630, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ground radar investigates shallow archaeological features in burial mounds of the Kofun Period (300-700 AD) in Japan. A variety of analytical methods – time slices, synthetic radargrams simulated from model structures, and 3-D depth constructions – are used to interpret the profiles, to reveal the location, depth and shapes of buried features.

Type
Notes
Information
Antiquity , Volume 67 , Issue 255 , June 1993 , pp. 349 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bevan, B. & Kenyon, J. 1975. Ground probing radar for historical archaeology, MASCA Newsletter.11: 2–7.Google Scholar
Duke, S. 1990. Calibration of ground penetration radar andcalculation of attenuation and dielec-tric permittivity versus depth. MSc. thesis, Colorado School of Mines.Google Scholar
Goodman, D. & Nishimura, Y. 1992a. 2–D synthetic radargrams for use in archaeological investigation, in 4th International Conference on Ground Penetration Radar, Special Paper 16: 339–43.Rovaneimi: Finland Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Goodman, D. & Nishimura, Y. 1992b. Radar archaeometry and the use of synthetic radargrams to investigate burial grounds in Japan, 28th International Symposium on Archaeometry 167. Los Angeles (CA).Google Scholar
Hiroshi, T. 1989. Kodaisi Fukugen. Tokyo: Koudansha.Google Scholar
Imai, T. Sakayama, T. & Kanemori, T. 1987.Use of ground–probing radar and resistivity surveys for archaeological investigations, Geophysics 52: 137–50.Google Scholar
Jackson, J.D. 1977. Classical electrodynamics. New York (NY): John Wiley.Google Scholar
Mcaleer, N. 1988. Pixel archaeology: ground penetrating radar and remote sensing locate archaeological sites, Discover 9 (8): 72–8.Google Scholar
Nishimura, Y. & Kamei, H. 1990. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Archaeometry, Heidelberg.Germany. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Stove, G.C. & Addyman, H. 1989. Ground probing impulse radar: an experiment in archaeological remote sensing at York, Antiquity 63: 377–42.Google Scholar
Vaughn, C.J. 1986. Ground–penetrating radar surveys used in archaeological investigations, Geophysics 51 (3): 595–604.Google Scholar