Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T11:38:04.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rach Nui: ground stone technology in coastal Neolithic settlements of southern Vietnam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2017

Catherine J. Frieman*
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
Phillip J. Piper
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
Nguyen Khanh Trung Kien
Affiliation:
Center for Archaeology, Southern Institute of Social Sciences, No. 49 Nguyen Thi Minh Khai, Ben Nghe Ward, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Tran Thi Kim Quy
Affiliation:
ROCEEH Research Centre, Senckenberg Research Institute, Senckenberganlage 25, D-60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Marc Oxenham
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
*
*Author for correspondence (Email: catherine.frieman@anu.edu.au)

Abstract

The discovery of a small portable grinding stone at Rach Nui in southern Vietnam provides significant new insights into regional Neolithic trade networks and ground stone technologies. Previous research held that the manufacture of stone tools took place near stone sources in the interior, along the Dong Nai and Be River basins, but the Rach Nui grinding stone comes from a Neolithic site in the Mekong Delta, approximately 80km to the south-east. This suggests that some manufacturing occurred away from raw material sources. Technological analysis indicates that the artefact was a portable tool for the polishing, maintenance and repair of ground stone adzes. Its discovery at Rach Nui may indicate the presence of specialist tool makers or itinerant traders. This research illustrates the complexity of Neolithic trading networks, and highlights the technological expertise that circulated alongside finished and incomplete objects.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J.L. 2002. Ground stone analysis: a technological approach. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Audoux, D., Coulon, G. & Girault, J.-L.. 1992. Inventaire des polissoirs néolithiques de l'Indre. Revue archéologique du Centre de la France 31: 720. https://doi.org/10.3406/racf.1992.2664 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellwood, P., Oxenham, M., Bui, C.H., Nguyen, K.D., Willis, A., Sarjeant, C., Piper, P.J., Matsumura, H., Tanaka, K., Beavan-Athfield, N., Higham, T., Nguyen, Q.M., Dang, N.K., Nguyen, K.T.K., Nguyen, T.H., Van, N.B., Tran, T.K.Q., Nguyen, P.T., Campos, F., Sato, Y.-I., Nguyen, L.C. & Amano, N.. 2012. An Son and the Neolithic of southern Vietnam. Asian Perspectives 50 (1–2): 144–75.Google Scholar
Boer-Mah, T. 2008. Reduction and adze-form: ground stone adzes from Ban Non Wat, northeast Thailand. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 28: 4451.Google Scholar
Bui, C.H., Nguyen, K.T.K. & Dang, N.K.. 2017. Archaeology of Nam Bo (Prehistory). Hanoi: Khoa hoc Xa hoi (in Vietnamese, English summary by P.J. Piper).Google Scholar
de Capitani, A., Deschler-Erb, S., Leuzinger, U., Marti-Grädel, E. & Schibler, J.. 2002. Die jungsteinzitliche Seeufersiedlung Arbon Bleiche 3. Die Funde. Thurgau: Departement für Erziehung und Kultur des Kantons Thurgau.Google Scholar
Duff, R. 1970. Stone adzes of Southeast Asia: an illustrated typology (Canterbury Museum Bulletin 3). Christchurch: Canterbury Museum Trust Board.Google Scholar
Hansen, P.V. & Madsen, B.. 1983. Flint axe manufacture in the Neolithic. An experimental investigation of a flint axe manufacture site at Hastrup Vænget, East Zealand. Journal of Danish Archaeology 2: 4359.Google Scholar
Kelterborn, P. 1992. Eine Beilwerkstatt im Seegubel, Jona SG. Jahrbuch der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Ur- und Frühgeschichte 75: 133–38.Google Scholar
Liu, L., Field, J., Fullagar, R., Bestel, S., Chen, X. & Ma, X.. 2010. What did grinding stones grind? New light on Early Neolithic subsistence economy in the Middle Yellow River Valley, China. Antiquity 84: 816–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00100249 Google Scholar
Liu, L., Ge, W., Bestel, S., Jones, D., Shi, J., Song, Y. & Chen, X.. 2011. Plant exploitation of the last foragers at Shizitan in the Middle Yellow River Valley China: evidence from grinding stones. Journal of Archaeological Science 38: 3524–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2011.08.015 Google Scholar
Madsen, B. 1984. Flint axe manufacture in the Neolithic: experiments with grinding and polishing of thin-butted flint axes. Journal of Danish Archaeology 3: 4762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masanari, N. & Nguyen, K.D.. 2002. Excavation of An Son: a Neolithic mound site in the middle reach of the Vam Co Dong River, southern Vietnam. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 22: 101109.Google Scholar
Monnier, J.-L., Pétrequin, A.-M., Praud, I., Pétrequin, P. & Rossy, M.. 1986. Les polissoirs, in Pétrequin, P. (ed.) Les sites littoraux néolithiques de Clairvaux-les-Lacs et de Chalain (Jura): 447–53. Paris: Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.Google Scholar
Nguyen, K.T.K. 2017. Loại hình xưởng chế tác đá thời tiền sử ở Đông Nam Bộ. Luận án tiến sỹ, Học viện Khoa học Xã hội, Hà Nội. Unpublished report (in Vietnamese).Google Scholar
Thang, Nguyen Manh. 2005. Bao Cao Ket Qua: Khai Quat Khao Co Hoc Di Chi Rach Nui (Can Giuoc—Long An)—Nam 2003. Unpublished report (in Vietnamese).Google Scholar
Oxenham, M.F., Piper, P.J., Bellwood, P., Bui, C.H., Nguyen, K.T.K., Nguyen, Q.M., Campos, F., Castillo, C., Wood, R., Sarjeant, C., Amano, N., Willis, A. & Ceron, J.. 2015. Emergence and diversification of the Neolithic of southern Vietnam: insights from coastal Rach Nui. Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 10: 309–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2014.980473 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phạm, Q.S. 1978. The excavation at Rach Nui (Can Giuoc district—Long An Province), in Archaeological discoveries in southern Vietnam: 97130. Ho Chi Minh City: Social Science Publisher (in Vietnamese).Google Scholar
Pisnupong, P. 1993. The industrial stone technology, in Higham, C. & Thosarat, R. (ed.) The excavation of Khok Phanom Di, a prehistoric site in central Thailand. Volume III: the material culture (part 1): 45104. London: Society of Antiquaries of London.Google Scholar
Rowan, Y.M. & Ebeling, J.R.. 2008. Introduction: the potential of ground stone studies, in Rowan, Y.M. & Ebeling, J.R. (ed.) New approaches to old stones: recent studies of ground stone artifacts: 115. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Sarjeant, C. 2014. Contextualising the Neolithic occupation of southern Vietnam: the role of ceramics and potters at An Son (Terra Australis 42). Canberra: Australian National University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tao, D., Wu, Y., Guo, Z., Hill, D.V. & Wang, C.. 2011. Starch grain analysis for ground stone tools from Neolithic Baiyinchanghan site: implications for their function in northeast China. Journal of Archaeological Science 38: 3577–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2011.08.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar