Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-mm7gn Total loading time: 0.224 Render date: 2022-08-09T21:36:22.916Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Article contents

Planet of camps: border assemblages and their challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2019

Yannis Hamilakis*
Affiliation:
Joukowsky Institute for Archaeology and the Ancient World, Brown University, Box 1837, Rhode Island Hall, 60 George Street, Providence, RI 02912, USA (Email: y.hamilakis@brown.edu)

Extract

In his 2017 masterful film Happy End, the European auteur Michael Haneke returns to some of his favourite themes by portraying the life of a contemporary dysfunctional, white bourgeoisie family in Calais, France, struggling to deal with the skeletons in their cupboard. They are also mostly oblivious to the thousands of migrants from the Global South attempting to negotiate yet another borderland and cross into Britain. In the final scene, a group of them bursts uninvited into the family's engagement party. This classic Hanekean tense moment reminds us that contemporary global migration, rather than being a novel and unexpected ‘crisis’, amounts to an unavoidable return, a return of the oppressed and the colonised; it is a moment in the unfinished histories of white European global domination. In that sense, rather than being a ‘migration crisis’, it can be better described as a reception crisis (cf. Christopoulos 2016), a crisis of the contemporary nation states in the Global North who find it impossible to come to terms with their own histories.

Type
Review Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 93 , Issue 371 , October 2019 , pp. 1371 - 1377
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agier, M., Bouagga, Y., Galisson, M., Hanappe, C., Pette, M. & Wannesson, P.. 2019. The Jungle: Calais's camps and migrants. Translated by Fernbach, D.. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Besteman, C. 2019. Militarized global apartheid. Current Anthropology 60: S2638. https://doi.org/10.1086/699280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christopoulos, D. 2016. ‘Europe's solidarity crisis: a perspective from Greece. Interview with G. Souvlis’. Roar, 8 June. Available at: https://roarmag.org/essays/europe-refugee-solidarity-crisis-greece/ (accessed 12 September 2019).Google Scholar
de Leon, J. 2015. The land of open graves: living and dying on the migrant trail. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Die Bündniskampagne No Humboldt 21. 2013. Stop the planned construction of the Humboldt Forum in the Berlin Palace. Available at: http://www.no-humboldt21.de/resolution/english/ (accessed 12 September 2019).Google Scholar
Hamilakis, Y. 2017a [2016]. Archaeologies of forced and undocumented migration. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 3: 121–39. https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.32409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilakis, Y. 2017b. Sensorial assemblages: affect, memory, and temporality in assemblage thinking. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 27: 169–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774316000676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilakis, Y. (ed.). 2018. The new nomadic age: archaeologies of forced and undocumented migration. Sheffield: Equinox. https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.32409Google Scholar
Holtorf, C., Pantazatos, A. & Scarre, G. (ed.). 2018. Cultural heritage, ethics, and contemporary migrations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McGuire, R. 2013. Steel walls and picket fences: re-materialising the US-Mexican border in Ambos Nogales. American Anthropologist 115: 446–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.12029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, D. & Tsianos, V.S.. 2013. After citizenship: autonomy of migration, organisational ontology and mobile commons. Citizenship Studies 17: 178–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2013.780736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soto, G. 2016. Migrant memento mori and the geography of risk. Journal of Social Archaeology 16: 335–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605316673171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Planet of camps: border assemblages and their challenges
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Planet of camps: border assemblages and their challenges
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Planet of camps: border assemblages and their challenges
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *