Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T15:59:02.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A New Building-Inscription from the Saxon-Shore Fort at Reculver, Kent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2011

Extract

Excavations have recently been conducted at the Saxon-Shore fort of Reculver (Regulbium) by Mr. Brian Philp, through whose kindness the writer is able to comment upon the inscription here discussed (fig. i). Eleven fragments comprise a substantive part of an inscribed rectangular slab, of local calcareous sandstone, now 11½ in. high. All the margins except the bottom one are in evidence, and exhibit plain edges, as if the slab had either been set into walling or framed by ornamental features.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 224 note 1 C.I.L. vii, 592, A.A. 4 xvi, 243, and E.E. ix, 1171 (Chesters): C.I.L. vii, 715 (Chesterholm); C.I.L. vii, 838 (Birdoswald); E.E. vii, 986 (Chester-le-Street); C.I.L. vii, 287 (Lancaster); C.I.L. vii, 268, Antiq. Joum. xxxii, 185 (Ravenscar).

page 225 note 1 Liebenam, W., Fasti consulares Imperil Romani (1909), p. 27Google Scholar.

page 225 note 2 J.R.S. xxii, 69–70.

page 226 note 1 V.C.H. Norfolk, i (1901), 305Google Scholar; cf. Bushe-Fox, J. P., J.R.S. xxii, 70Google Scholar.

page 226 note 2 C.W. 2 xxxviii, 206–10 (Bewcastle); A.A. 4 xi, 90–91 (South Shields).

page 226 note 3 e.g. Atkinson, D., Report on Excavations at Wroxeter (1942)Google Scholar, appendix C, particularly pp. 35–60.

page 226 note 4 I.L.S. 2414 (Mainz), 2615 (Syene).

page 226 note 5 C.I.L. vii, 965; I.L.S. 2619.

page 226 note 6 Ibid. 445 balneum cum basilica (Lanchester); 287 balineum[et b]asilicam (Lancaster), I.L.S. 2548.

page 226 note 7 C.W. 2 XXX, 201; J.R.S. xix, 215.

page 226 note 8 Theb. x, 176–7.

page 227 note 1 Hist, iv, 4, 5.

page 227 note 2 For tile C(oh) I B(aetasiorum), see J.R.S. forthcoming; Not. Dign. Oc. xxviii, 18; tribunus cohortis I Baetasiorum, Regulbio.

page 227 note 3 I.L.S. 2622.

page 227 note 4 E.E. ix, p. 527.

page 227 note 5 Lambaesis, Cagnat, R., Les Deux Camps de la légion de Lambèse, Mém. de l'Acad. des inscript. Et belles-lettres, xxxviii (1908), 252Google Scholar: cf. C.I.L. viii, 2554–6, 2560–2.

page 227 note 6 E.E. vii, 943: the piece has room for only six or seven letters in each line. It thus belongs before the conferment of Dacicus in A.D. 102.

page 227 note 7 E. Birley, A.A. 4 xi, 131–7: for the same author's conjectured procuratorial province lasting from A.D. 197 until A.D. 213, see C.W. 2 liii, 58–62.

page 228 note 1 Sutherland, C. H. V., Coinage and Currency in Roman Britain (1937), pp. 156–7Google Scholar.

page 228 note 2 St. Joseph, J. K., Antiq. Journ. xvi, 444–60Google Scholar.

page 228 note 3 Bradwell, R.C.H.M. Essex, iv, 13–14: for Burgh, V.C.H. Suffolk, i, 282–6, 301–2.

page 228 note 4 F.C.H. Suffolk, i, 288–90, 305–7. The eighteenth-century accounts suggest that the fort had angle-bastions, as at Burgh Castle.