Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Bridging the Two Cultures – Commercial Archaeology and the Study of Prehistoric Britain

  • Richard Bradley (a1)

Abstract

This paper was given at a meeting of the Society held on 12 January 2006 and it discusses the relationship between academic research and developer-funded archaeology in Britain today, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each. It considers the relationship between archaeological theory and practice and discusses the changing roles of academics, fieldworkers and managers. It argues that important issues need to be resolved, including the dissemination of information from recent archaeological fieldwork and the use of ‘grey literature’ in informing more ambitious interpretations of the past.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Andrews, G, Barrett, J and Lewis, J 2000. ‘Interpretation not record: the practice of archaeology’, Antiquity, 74, 525–30
Association of Local Government Archaeology Officers 2002. Historic Environment Records: Benchmarks for Good Practice, London
Barrett, J 1987. ‘The Glastonbury lake village: models and source criticism’, Archaeol J, 144, 409–23
Bradley, R 2003. ‘Seeing things: perception, experience and the constraints of excavation’, J Social Archaeol, 3.2, 151–68
Bradley, R forthcoming. The Prehistory of Britain and Ireland, Cambridge
Brewster, T 1980. The Excavation ofGarton and Wetwang Slacks, London
Childe, V G 1956. Piecing Together the Past, London
Darvill, T, Russell, B and Bell, C 2002. Archaeology After PPG 16: Archaeological Investigations in England 1990–1999, Bournemouth
Department of the Environment 1990. Planning Policy Guideline. Archaeology and Planning (PPG 16), London
Edgeworth, M 2003. Acts of Discovery: An Ethnography of Archaeological Practice, Oxford
English Heritage 2005a. English Heritage Research Agenda: An Introduction to English Heritage's Research Themes and Programmes, London
English Heritage 2005b. Discovering the Past, Shaping the Future. Research Strategy 2005–2010, London
Gaukroger, S 2001. Francis Bacon and the Transformation of Early-Modern Philosophy, Cambridge
Geertz, C 1973. ‘Thick description: towards an interpretive theory of culture’, in The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays (Geertz, C), 330, New York
Hey, G and Lacey, M 2001. Evolution of Archaeological Decision-Making Processes and Strategies, Maidstone
Hodder, I 1999. The Archaeological Process, Oxford
Hunter, J and Ralston, I (eds) 1993. Archaeological Resource Management in the UK. An Introduction, Stroud
Olivier, A 1996. Frameworks for our Past: A Review of Research Frameworks, Strategies and Priorities, London
O'Sullivan, J 2003. ‘Reporting, publication and dissemination’, in Archaeology and the National Road Authority (ed O'Sullivan, J), 91811, Dublin
Phillips, T and Bradley, R 2004. ‘Developer- funded field work in Scotland, 1990–2003: an overview of the prehistoric evidence’, Proc Soc Antiq Scotl, 134, 1751
Piggott, S 1959. Approach to Archaeology, London
Piggott, S 1963. ‘Archaeology and prehistory: presidential address’, Proc Prehist Soc, 29, 116
Piggott, S 1989. Ancient Britons and the Antiquarian Imagination, London
Rahtz, P (ed) 1974. Rescue Archaeology, Harmondsworth
Richmond, IA 1943. ‘Appreciation of R G Collingwood as an archaeologist’, Proc Brit Acad, 29, 476–80
Roskams, S 2001. Excavation, Cambridge
Strathern, M (ed) 2000. Audit Cultures, London
Sweet, R 2004. Antiquaries. The Discovery of the Past in Eighteenth-Century Britain, London
Tilley, C 2004. The Materiality of Stone, Oxford

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed