Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T21:38:55.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Anglo-Saxon Openwork Mount from Whitby Abbey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2011

Günther Haseloff
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a previous volume of this journal a piece of ornamental openwork in lead from excavations at Whitby Abbey was published as a medieval ventilator-screen of the type described by the Rev. Christopher Woodforde. These are likewise of lead and of obvious Gothic shape. The Whitby piece was accordingly dated to the late thirteenth century. A more detailed examination shows, however, that the Whitby openwork is neither Gothic in shape nor a ventilator-screen (pl. xixa).

Type
Research Article
Information
The Antiquaries Journal , Volume 30 , Issue 3-4 , October 1950 , pp. 170 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 170 note 1 Antiq. Journ. xi (1931), 425, pl. 62Google Scholar.

page 170 note 2 Sir Peers, Charles and Radford, C. A. Ralegh, ‘The Saxon Monastery of Whitby’, Arch, lxxxix (1943), 27 fGoogle Scholar.

page 170 note 3 Rev.Woodforde, Christopher, ‘Some Medieval Leaden Ventilating Panels at Wells and Glaston-bury’, Journ. Brit. Soc. of Master Glass-Painters, ix (1944), 44 fGoogle Scholar.

page 171 note 1 Brendsted, J., Early English Ornament, 1924, 16 f.Google Scholar; Brown, Baldwin, The Arts in Early England, v (1921), 305 f.Google Scholar; Collingwood, W. G., Northumbrian Crosses (1927), 106 f.Google Scholar; Kendrick, T. D., Anglo-Saxon Art to A.D. 900 (1938), 126 fGoogle Scholar.

page 171 note 2 Brandsted, J., op. cit., figs. 22-5Google Scholar; Brown, Baldwin, op. cit., pl. 11Google Scholar; Collingwood, W. G., op. cit., fig. 101Google Scholar; Kendrick, T. D., op. cit., pls. 47, 48Google Scholar.

page 171 note 3 Brøndsted, J., op. cit., fig. 70Google Scholar; Kendrick, T. D., op. cit., pl. 50Google Scholar.

page 171 note 4 Brøndsted, J., op. cit., fig. 55Google Scholar; Brown, Baldwin, op. cit., vi, pl. xvGoogle Scholar.

page 171 note 5 Brøndsted, J., op. cit., fig. 56Google Scholar; Brown, Baldwin, op. cit., vi, partii. pl. 66Google Scholar; Kendrick, T. D., op. cit., pl. 51Google Scholar.

page 171 note 6 Brown, Baldwin, op. cit., vi, part i, pl. 1Google Scholar; Kendrick, T. D., op. cit., pl. 43Google Scholar.

page 171 note 7 Cf. Arch, lxxxix (1943), 27 fGoogle Scholar.

page 171 note 8 Zimmermann, E. H., Vorkarolingische Miniaturen (1916), pls. 322, 323aGoogle Scholar.

page 171 note 9 Ibid., pl. 286a.

page 171 note 10 Ibid., pl. 169; J. Brondsted, op. cit., fig. 71.

page 171 note 11 Bergens Museum 4342. Lorange, Aarsberetning 1885, Bergens Museums Tilvæxt, p. 11, no. 44, pl. n, 9; Shetelig, H., Osebergfundet III (1920), 265, fig. 271Google Scholar; id., Vikingeminner i Vesteuropa (1933), 175, fig. 63Google Scholar; id., Viking Antiquities in Great Britain and Ireland, part v, ‘British Antiquities of the Viking Period found in Norway’, by Petersen, Jan (1940), 179, fig. 146Google Scholar.

page 172 note 1 Mahr, A., Christian Art in Ancient Ireland, i (1932), pl. 14Google Scholar; Henry, Fr., Irish Art in the Early Christian Period (1940), pls. 45–6Google Scholar.

page 172 note 2 Mahr, A., op. cit., pls. 51–3Google Scholar; Henry, Fr., op. cit., pl. 47Google Scholar.

page 172 note 3 e.g. penannular brooch from Roscrea, Mahr, A., op. cit., pl. 20, 1Google Scholar; penannular brooch from Co. Cavan, ibid., pl. 22, 1; penannular brooch from Kilmainham, ibid., pl. 22, 2.

page 172 note 4 Arbman, H., Schuieden und das Karolingische Reich (1937), 151, 156Google Scholar.

page 172 note 5 Ibid., 157, fig. 27; Ad. Goldschmidt, Die Elfenbeinskulpturen aus der Zeit der karolingischen und sächsischen Kaiser, 8.-11. Jahrhundert, i(1914), pl. xix, 40a.

page 172 note 6 The first specimens of Carolingian filigree work with the design of foliage scrolls are the Ante-pendium of Wolvinus in St. Ambrogio in Milan (Tarchiani, N., ‘L'altare d'oro di Sant-Ambrogio di Milano’, Dedalo, ii (1921-1922)Google Scholar), and the so-called reliquary of Pépin of Aquitaine at Conques (Linas, Ch. de, Gazette archiologique, viii (1887), 37–49, 291-7, pls. 6, 37, 38Google Scholar; Braun, J., Die Relijuiare des christlichen Kultes (1940), fig. 143)Google Scholar.

page 172 note 7 British Museum OA 21. British Museum, A Guide to Anglo-Saxon and Foreign Teutonic Antiquities (1923), fig. 122Google Scholar; Jenny-Volbach, , Germanischer Schmuck (1933), pl. 58Google Scholar; Kendrkk, T. D., op. cit., pl. 78, 3Google Scholar; Smith, Reginald, P.S.A., 2nd ser., xxiii (1910), 304Google Scholar.

page 173 note 1 Friis-Johansen, K., ‘Selvskatten fra Terslev’, Aarbeger for Nordisk Oldkyndighed (1912), 244Google Scholar; B.M. Guide to Anglo-Saxon Antiquities, 102; Arbman, H., op. cit., 156Google Scholar.

page 173 note 2 Cf. Arbman, H., op. cit., 188, n. 1Google Scholar; Rademacher, F., Frankische Goldscheibenfibeln (1940), 19Google Scholar The Äquatorschnitt is already found in goldsmiths’ work of the Hellenistic period. From there it was derived to Gothic, Prankish, Anglo-Saxon, and Irish filigree work. It is also to be found on a pendant of English origin in the find from Hon (Norway) (Arbman, H., op. cit., pls. 60, 2; 59, 1)Google Scholar.

page 173 note 3 The filigree of the Kirkoswald ornament is not made out of a wire of circular cross-section but out of a broad ribbon, the pearled design being stamped on its upper and lower edges, the latter soldered to the base-plate.

page 173 note 4 e.g. buckles with filigree work from Wickhara and Faversham in the British Museum.

page 173 note 5 Brown, Baldwin, op. cit., v, pl. 30, 31, fig. 22, pp. 318 f.Google Scholar; Brondsted, J., op. cit., 87 f., figs. 72, 73Google Scholar; Kendrick, T. D., op. cit., 150, pl. 60, fig. 24Google Scholar.

page 173 note 6 Petersen, J., Vikingetidens Smykker (1928), 136, fig. 153Google Scholar.

page 173 note 7 Friis-Johansen, K., op. cit., 201, no. 48, fig. 15Google Scholar.

page 173 note 8 British Museum 47, 2-7, 1. British Museum, Guide to Anglo-Saxon Antiquities, 156. It should be noted that the original entry in the Museum register (1847) mentions that it ‘is said to be found in Rome with coins of the 10th century’. Th e evidence upon which Mr. Reginald Smith based his definite statement in the B.M. Anglo-Saxon Guide that the associated coins were those of Offa is not known. There are no coins of Offa found in Rome in the British Museum. The style of the ornament, however, agrees very well with an Offan date and hardly fits the 10th century.

page 174 note 1 Brown, Baldwin, op. cit. vi, part i, pl. 111Google Scholar.

page 174 note 2 Arch, lxxxix (1943), fig. 10, 20Google Scholar.

page 174 note 3 Ibid., p. 54, no. 18.