Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T00:16:33.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Lost Cycle of Canterbury Paintings of 1220

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2011

Madeline Harrison Caviness
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Mid nineteenth-century sketches of paintings then in the vaults of the Trinity Chapel ambulatory of Canterbury Cathedral are published for the first time. They provide an opportunity to discuss the iconographic programme and style of the lost paintings. Kings of England and local saints were among those represented in commemoration of the translation of the relics of Becket to the Trinity Chapel in July 1220. The date of 1220 which seems to be given in an inscription is confirmed by comparison with a Canterbury Psalter of before 1220, and sculptures at Wells.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Antiquaries Journal , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , March 1974 , pp. 66 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 66 note 1 Powicke, F. M., Stephen Langton (Ford Lectures, Oxford, 1927), London, 1929, pp. 75–6Google Scholar.

page 66 note 2 Brieger, P., English Art, 1216–1307 (Oxford, 1957), p. 17Google Scholar.

page 66 note 3 Powicke, F. M., The Thirteenth Century, 1216–1307 (Oxford, 1962), p. 18Google Scholar.

page 66 note 4 Gervase, , ed. Stubbs, W., Gervasii Cantuariensis Opera Historica (Rolls Series 73, London, 1879), i, pp. 3–29Google Scholar.

page 66 note 5 Ed. Madden, Frederic, Matthaei Parisiensis Monachi Sancti Albani, Historia Anglorum sive Historia Minor (London, 1866), ii, pp. 241–2Google Scholar, ‘De translatione sancti Thomae martins’, from British Museum, Roy. MS. 14 C. vii. Another account by Matthew Paris, composed for his life of Stephen Langton, was printed from British Museum, MS. Cotton Nero D. I by Liebermann, Felix, Ungedrückte anglo-Normannische Geschichtsquellen (Strasbourg, 1879), pp. 328–9Google Scholar. Other contemporary accounts are given in translation by Mason, A. J., What became of the Bones of St. Thomas? (Cambridge, 1920), pp. 70–83Google Scholar.

page 66 note 6 Branner, R., ‘Westminster Abbey and the French Court Style’, Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, xxiii (1964), pp. 3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Horlbeck, F. R., ‘The vault paintings in Salisbury Cathedral’, Archaeological Journal, cxvii (1960), pp. 116–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Tristram, E. W., English Medieval Wall Painting: The Thirteenth Century (Oxford, 1950), pp. 26–7Google Scholar.

page 66 note 7 Brief and not altogether accurate accounts are given in Tristram, op. cit., pp. 519–20, and ibid.‘The paintings of Canterbury Cathedral’, Canterbury Cathedral Chronicle, 22 (1935), pp. 15–16Google Scholar.

page 67 note 1 See the obituary in The Gentleman's Magazine, 185, N.S. 31 (June 1849), pp. 659–61; his drawings of the paintings are mentioned, p. 660.

page 67 note 2 Add. MS. 1, ff. 29–38v. I am indebted to Dr. William Urry for his assistance, and to Miss Oakley of the Cathedral Library for her help with photographing the manuscript.

page 67 note 3 For this reason I have relied entirely on the sketches. Tristram arrived at fourteen figures by taking into account some subjects from both series of drawings.

page 67 note 4 A letter in Austin Senior's hand on f. 45 refers to wall paintings in the Trinity Chapel of ‘encounters with eastern infidels’. These were removed during the restoration of the Cathedral under Dean Percy, in Austin's time.

page 67 note 5 Gostling, William, A Walk in and about the City of Canterbury, 2nd edn. (Canterbury, 1777), p. 263Google Scholar, and pi. facing.

page 67 note 6 Cave, C. J. P., ‘The Roof-bosses in Canterbury Cathedral’, Archaeologia, lxxxiv (1935), p. 42Google Scholar.

page 68 note 1 Tristram, Chronicle, p. 15. I am grateful to Mrs. D. Dluhy for her opinion.

page 68 note 2 Clemen, Paul, Die gotischen Monumental-malereien der Rheinlande (Düsseldorf, 1930), pl. 16Google Scholar.

page 68 note 3 Deschamps, Paul and Thibout, Marc, La peinture murale en France au début de l'époque gothique (Paris [1963]), pl. xxv, 1, pp. 66–8Google Scholar.

page 68 note 4 Tristram, Thirteenth Century Wall Painting, pi. 83. Horlbeck, op. cit., fig. 3.

page 68 note 5 Tristram, E. W., English Medieval Wall Painting: The Twelfth Century (Oxford, 1944)Google Scholar, suppl. pi. 3a, pls. 20–1, p. 104.

page 68 note 6 Wormald, F., English Benedictine Kalendars after 1100 (Henry Bradshaw Society lxxvii, London, 1939), i, p. 66Google Scholar.

page 68 note 7 Brieger, op. cit., p. 7.

page 69 note 1 Wormald, op. cit., pp. 68, 75, 78.

page 69 note 2 The reign of Henry was computed from his coronation at Gloucester, 28 October 1216; Powicke, Thirteenth Century, p. 1.

page 69 note 3 Toke, N. E., ‘The Opus Alexandrinum and sculptured stone roundels in the retro-choir of Canterbury Cathedral’, Archaeologia Cantiana, xlii (1930), p. 215Google Scholar.

page 69 note 4 Close examination of the exterior from scaffolding in 1967 revealed the extent of damage; some glasses are paper thin, others are severely pitted, and most have a thick layer of patina which has reappeared since cleaning in the 1940s. See Caviness, ‘Saving Canterbury's Medieval Glass’, Country Life, 28 September 1972, pp. 739–40.

page 69 note 5 Johnson, James Rosser, The Radiance of Chartres (New York, 1965), pp. 15–18Google Scholar.

page 69 note 6 Stubbs, W., ed., Chronicles and Memorials of the Reign of Richard I, vol. ii, Epistolae Cantuariensis, the letters of the Prior and Convent of Christ Church, Canterbury, from A.D. 1187 to A.D. 1199 (London, 1865), p. 499Google Scholar, letter 534.

page 70 note 1 Cave, op. cit., p. 46. For the capitals see Newman, John, North East and East Kent (The Buildings of England), (Harmondsworth, [1969]), p. 179Google Scholar, fig. 28.

page 70 note 2 Toke, op. cit., p. 220, gave evidence for the mosaic being in situ.

page 70 note 3 Comparison was made by Dudley, Colin, ‘Sacred Geometry’,Canterbury Cathedral Chronicle, 64 (1969)Google Scholar, figs. 7 and 8.

page 70 note 4 The tomb was identified as Hubert Walter's when it was opened in 1890; see Hope, W. St. John, ‘On the Tomb of an Archbishop recently opened in the Cathedral Church of Canterbury’, Vetusta Monumenta, vii. i (1893), p. 11Google Scholar.

page 70 note 5 ‘Gervase's’ account (actually that of his continuator) is given in Stubbs, W., ed., Actus Pontificum, Gervasii Cantuariensis Opera Historica (Rolls Series 73, London, 1880), ii, pp. lxiii–lxivGoogle Scholar, 99–100. The presence of the monks at St. Bertin was acknowledged in a letter from the Pope to the Abbot, printed in Potthast, August, Regesta Pontificum Romanorum (London and Paris, 1874), i, p. 271Google Scholar, no. 3177, and by John of Ypres in his Chronicon sancti Bertini, ed. Martene, Edmond and Durand, Ursin, Thesaurus novus aneedotorum (Paris, 1717), iii, cols. 688–9Google Scholar.

page 70 note 6 Poole, Austin Lane, From Domesday Book to Magna Carta, 1087 to 1216, 2nd edn. (Oxford, [1955]), pp. 445 ffGoogle Scholar.

page 70 note 7 Toke, op. cit., pp. 194–8.

page 71 note 1 Most recently see Branner, Robert, ‘The Painted Medallions in the Sainte-Chapelle in Paris’, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, N.S. 58, part 2 (1968), pp. 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar ff.

page 71 note 2 Gardner, Arthur, English Medieval Sculpture (Cambridge, 1951), pp. 131–4Google Scholar.

page 71 note 3 For St. Dunstan and St. Thomas, cf. Gardner, op. cit., fig. 244.

page 71 note 4 Wormald, op. cit., p. 64.