Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T01:53:24.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multifacility outbreak of Candida auris during the COVID-19 pandemic—Maricopa County, Arizona, April 2022–December 2022

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2023

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Background: Candida auris, an emerging and potentially multidrug-resistant fungus, was first identified in Maricopa County, Arizona, in 2020. On April 21, 2022, an acute-care hospital reported C. auris in a bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimen, followed by a second case reported on April 26 identified via retrospective laboratory review and species identification in yeast isolated from a clinical specimen. The Maricopa County Department of Public Health (MCDPH) investigated, and we describe the largest ongoing C. auris outbreak containment response in Maricopa County. Methods: The MCDPH conducted clinical case and contact investigations in accordance with CDC novel organism containment strategy guidelines. In Maricopa County healthcare facilities (HCFs) with suspected transmission, virtual Infection Control Assessment Responses (ICARs) were administered to identify initial infection prevention and control (IPC) gaps; subsequent regular virtual visits were also provided. HCFs with confirmed transmission completed point-prevalence surveys (PPSs) every 2 weeks until transmission halted as evidenced by 2 sequential negative PPSs. Outreach education to affected HCFs was provided to increase awareness about the public health significance of C. auris and the importance of implementation and sustained adherence to standardized IPC protocols. Results: In total, 97 HCFs received IPC outreach education, of which 22 HCFs (23%) had suspected transmission and received a virtual ICAR. Contact investigation identified 1,990 contacts, of whom 1,028 (52%) were discharged to the community, 863 (43%) were admitted to other HCFs, and 99 (5%) died. Of the 863 transferred contacts, 10 (1.2%) declined colonization screening, 853 (98.8%) were screened, and 46 (5%) tested positive for C. auris. Through sequential PPSs, 101 (5%) of 1,914 screened patients tested positive for C. auris. By December 31, 16 clinical and 147 colonized cases were epidemiologically linked to the outbreak. Their median age was 60 years (IQR, 20), and 3 pediatric cases (median age, 17 years) were identified with no pediatric unit admissions. Also, 7colonized cases (5%) developed noninvasive infection and 3 (2%) developed candidemia. Conclusions: The MCDPH’s established partnerships with HCFs were key to this ongoing C. auris outbreak response spanning 22 facilities over 8 months. Challenges included delays in specimen collection and laboratory processing, operational burden of repeated PPS, and ensuring appropriate precautions for readmitted close contacts at subsequent HCFs. The MCDPH assisted facilities in balancing public health surveillance with facility capacity to execute guidance, including repeated PPS. Consistent adherence to stringent IPC practices, interfacility communication, and proactive C. auris education of healthcare workers are paramount to halting transmission.

Disclosures: None

Type
Outbreaks
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America