Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T01:36:12.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microbiological Identification and Susceptibility Testing Using an Automated Method in a Tertiary-Care Public Hospital in Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2021

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Background: The use of the automated system for identification and susceptibility tests can improve antimicrobial stewardship. The reduction in the time of identification of the pathogen and the correct dose of antibiotic are factors that contribute significantly to institutional programs and patient outcomes. Objective: We identified and evaluated the susceptibility tests of microorganisms for common pathogens through antibiograms that accounted for the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), in a tertiary-care public hospital in Brazil. Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study was performed to identify microbiologic profiles after the implementation of a VITEK 2 system at a tertiary-care public hospital in Curitiba, Brazil. Based on data from the medical records, patients with positive cultures of clinical samples from August to December 2017 were included in this study. The analysis included culture results, susceptibility profiles, and MICs of 5 antibiotics: amikacin, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, meropenem and vancomycin. Results: In total, 545 antibiograms were evaluated using VITEK 2. The following microorganisms were isolated: 345 gram-negative bacilli (63.3%), 187 gram- positive cocci (34.3%), 9 unidentified microorganisms (1.7%), and 4 yeasts (0.7%). Among the analyzed antibiograms, amikacin was tested in 371 isolates (68.1%), with an MIC of 2 mg/L being the most prevalent value, with a frequency of 224 results (41.1%). Cefepime was tested in 319 isolates (58.5%), with an MIC of 1 mg/L being the most prevalent, with a frequency of 177 results (32.5%). Ciprofloxacin was tested in 470 isolates (86.2%), with an MIC of 0.25 mg/L being the most prevalent value, with frequency of 189 results (34.7%). Meropenem was tested in 318 isolates (58.3%), with an MIC of 0.25 mg/L being the most prevalent value, with a frequency of 223 results (40.9%). Vancomycin was tested in 157 isolates (28.8%), with an MIC of 1 mg/L being the most prevalent value, with frequency of 87 results (16%). Conclusions: When analyzing the most frequently isolated microorganisms and their predominant sensitivity profiles in our institution, amikacin proved to be a good therapeutic option, considering the epidemiological profile, as gram-negative bacilli showed greater sensitivity. Furthermore, VITEK 2 systems provided early access to appropriate antimicrobial therapy for patients, which is a known factor for reducing bacterial resistance.

Funding: No

Disclosures: None

Type
Diagnostic/Microbiology
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America