Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-78dcdb465f-xl52z Total loading time: 2.152 Render date: 2021-04-16T15:15:47.792Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Biogeography of terrestrial cyanobacteria from Antarctic ice-free areas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

Z. Namsaraev
Affiliation:
Center for Protein Engineering, University of Liège, B-4000 Liège, Belgium E-mail: zorigto@gmail.com Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117312 Moscow, Russia
M.-J. Mano
Affiliation:
Center for Protein Engineering, University of Liège, B-4000 Liège, Belgium E-mail: zorigto@gmail.com
R. Fernandez
Affiliation:
Center for Protein Engineering, University of Liège, B-4000 Liège, Belgium E-mail: zorigto@gmail.com
Annick Wilmotte
Affiliation:
Center for Protein Engineering, University of Liège, B-4000 Liège, Belgium E-mail: zorigto@gmail.com
Corresponding
E-mail address:
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cyanobacteria inhabit the Antarctic continent and have even been observed in the most southerly ice-free areas of Antarctica (86–87° S). The highest molecular diversity of cyanobacterial communities was found in the areas located between 70° S and 80° S. Further south and further north from this zone, the diversity abruptly decreased. Seventy-nine per cent (33 of 42 operational taxonomic units) of Antarctic terrestrial cyanobacteria have a cosmopolitan distribution. Analysis of the sampling efforts shows that only three regions (southern Victoria Land, the Sør Rondane Mountains and Alexander Island) have been particularly well studied, while other areas did not receive enough attention. Although cyanobacteria possess a capacity for long-range transport, regional populations in Antarctic ice-free areas seem to exist. The cyanobacterial communities of the three most intensively studied regions, separated from each other by a distance of 3000–3400 km, had a low degree of similarity with each other. Further development of microbial biogeography demands a standardized approach. For this purpose, as a minimal standard, we suggest using the sequence of cyanobacterial 16S rRNA gene between Escherichia coli positions 405 and 780.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © the Author(s) [year] 2010

Introduction

Ice-free areas of Antarctica cover a tiny proportion (0.34%) of the continent. They provide one of the most remote and harsh environments for terrestrial life. Antarctica is the only continent that is dominated by microbial (cyanobacteria and algae) and lower plant (predominantly mosses and lichens) communities. Only two vascular plants are known from the Antarctic, both restricted to coastal regions of the Antarctic Peninsula (Reference ConveyConvey, 2006).

Cyanobacteria are photosynthetic bacteria that require solar light, liquid water, air and some mineral nutrients for growth. They serve as primary colonizers of soils newly exposed by glacial retreat. Some taxa can fix atmospheric nitrogen, which can locally enrich the predominantly oligotrophic biotopes. Cyanobacteria are widespread in all geographical zones of Antarctica, where they can form macroscopically visible crusts or thin biofilms on the surface of soils and rocks, or occupy endolithic niches (Reference FriedmannFriedmann, 1982).

Microbial biogeography is currently at the center of a scientific debate. Some authors propose that local geographical populations of microorganisms exist, as is the case of the biogeography of higher organisms. Others propose that bacteria have such enormous dispersal capabilities, due to their small size and large populations, that only different environmental conditions permit the development of distinctive microbial populations (Reference MartinyMartiny and others, 2006).

Attempts to describe the biogeography of Antarctic cyanobacteria pose additional questions. Firstly, what are the means of transportation of cyanobacteria to and from Antarctica over the Southern Ocean? Secondly, do regional populations of cyanobacteria exist in Antarctica? Ice-free areas are separated from each other. However, the existence of a long-range cyanobacterial transport to Antarctica also implies their potential ability for intra-continental transport and mixing of different Antarctic populations. Thirdly, what is the history of species endemic to Antarctica? Endemism at species, genus and even family level is observed in Antarctic biota and it seems unlikely that such levels of endemism could have evolved after the last glaciation ∼18 000 years ago (Reference Taton, Grubisic, Balthasart, Hodgson, Laybourn-Parry and WilmotteTaton and others, 2006a; Reference ConveyConvey and others, 2008). Indeed, studies have proposed the existence of relict taxa that have evolved before glacial maxima (Reference Lawley, Ripley, Bridge and ConveyLawley and others, 2004; Reference De WeverDe Wever and others, 2009). Identification of the refugia of these taxa is important for understanding Antarctic biogeography (Reference ConveyConvey and others, 2008).

The comparison of cyanobacterial sequences found in different geographical areas allows us to estimate their degree of similarity and draw conclusions about their distribution. In this paper, we gathered all available information on the diversity of Antarctic terrestrial cyanobacteria into a single database in order to identify whether any broad-scale patterns in biogeography exist.

Terrestrial habitats were selected according to Reference BroadyBroady (1996) and include lithophytic (‘on or within rock substrata’ including epilithic, endolithic, chasmoendolithic, cryptoendolithic and hypolithic), edaphic (‘on the surface of and within soils’) and epiphytic (‘on the living surfaces of mosses and liverworts’), but we exclude the cryophilic (‘between ice crystals in surface layers of melting snow’) communities. In addition, limnetic (occurring in waters of lakes), supralittoral (occurring on the coastline) and fluvial (associated with streams and rivers) cyanobacteria were not taken into account. Historically, two approaches (floristic and molecular) were used to identify the Antarctic taxa, and they are treated separately below.

Floristic studies

Before the introduction of molecular techniques, the Antarctic continent was intensively studied by traditional methods, which included microscopic observations of the field samples, isolations of cyanobacteria in cultures and identification based on morphological characteristics. The morphological approach has clear weaknesses compared with the molecular approach. Morphological features do not necessarily reflect the real genetic and physiological divergences, which can only be revealed using molecular data (Reference Nadeau, Milbrandt and CastenholzNadeau and others, 2001).

Cyanobacteria occurred in nearly all ice-free localities so far investigated (Reference Broady and WeinsteinBroady and Weinstein, 1998). The Antarctic terrestrial microflora was dominated by cyanobacteria and chlorophytes (green algae), with xanthophytes (yellow-green algae) and bacillariophytes (diatoms) as frequent associates. Cyanobacteria and algae were more significant in the cold and arid coastal and slope provinces of continental Antarctica. In contrast, bryophytes and lichens dominated the vegetation in the milder and moister maritime Antarctica (Reference BroadyBroady, 1996).

The most isolated and climatically extreme terrestrial habitats are found in inland mountain ranges and nunataks. No cyanobacteria were detected in the most southerly outcrop, Mount Howe (87°21'S, 149°18'W), which is located ∼330km from the South Pole (Reference Cameron, Lacy, Morelli and MarshCameron and others, 1971). In the La Gorce Mountains (86°30'S, 147°W), located 90 km north of Mount Howe at ∼1750ma.s.l., Reference CameronCameron (1972) found two morphotypes of cyanobacteria: Schizothrix calcicola (Ag.) Gom and Porphyrosyphon notarisii (Menegh.). In the same location, five morphotypes of cyanobacteria were observed by Reference Broady and WeinsteinBroady and Weinstein (1998). These include: Gloeocapsa cf. kuetzingiana, Gloeocapsa cf. ralfsiana, cf. Aphanocapsa cf., Phormidium autumnale and Ammatoidea normanni (syn. Hammatoidea normanni). The authors noted that in full sun, soils could reach high surface temperatures (up to 12°C when ambient air was –7.5°C) and were moist due to ice melting. In cultures isolated from the La Gorce Mountains, the growth started after 7weeks at 8°C and all isolates grew at 15°C (Reference Broady and WeinsteinBroady and Weinstein, 1998).

Compared with these most southerly ice-free areas, the nunataks closer to the coast, in Dronning Maud Land and on the Edward VII Peninsula, support a richer flora. The diversity increases even more at coastal locations such as the Vestfold Hills. Reference Broady and WeinsteinBroady and Weinstein (1998) concluded that the ‘abundance and diversity of organisms decreases with progression south from the Maritime to the Continental Antarctic Zone, and within the latter with increasing altitude and latitude from the Coast to the Ice Slope Region due to increasingly severe conditions and isolation from rich propagule sources’.

Molecular methods

We included in our database all cyanobacterial sequences recorded from terrestrial habitats in the sub-Antarctic islands, maritime and continental Antarctica (Reference ConveyConvey, 2006). The cyanobacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences were downloaded from the GenBank-NIH (US National Institutes of Health) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/). In addition, a database of literature records was constructed to find cyanobacterial sequences deposited in databases as ‘uncultured bacterium’, but not marked as cyanobacterial. In total, 274 sequences were collected and analysed by similarity search using BLAST software. The sequences of chloroplasts of eukaryotic phototrophs misinterpreted as cyanobacterial sequences were excluded from the database. Chimera detection was performed using Pintail software (Reference Ashelford, Chuzhanova, Fry, Jones and WeightmanAshelford and others, 2005). The sequences were included in the database of the ARB software package (Reference LudwigLudwig and others, 2004) and aligned with the cyanobacterial sequences available from GenBank. The sequences in alignment were sorted in clusters according to the highly variable region corresponding to E. coli positions 463–468, and the resulting alignment was manually verified (Reference Taton, Grubisic, Brambilla, De Wit and WilmotteTaton and others, 2003). The partial sequences that did not overlap with the E. coli positions 405–780 (V3 and V4 regions) or had <75% overlap with this region were excluded from the analysis. This step excluded some sequences from the Vestfold Hills (Princess Elizabeth Land) (Reference Smith, Bowman, Scott and LineSmith and others, 2000) and part of the sequences from southern Victoria Land (Reference Wood, Rueckert, Cowan and CaryWood and others, 2008). However, this did not change the final conclusions. The remaining 173 sequences were grouped into 42 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with DOTUR software using the average neighbour method (Reference Schloss and HandelsmanSchloss and Handelsman, 2005; Reference Taton, Grubisic, Balthasart, Hodgson, Laybourn-Parry and WilmotteTaton and others, 2006a). The OTUs were defined as groups of sequences that exhibit >97.5% similarity with each other, using the E. coli positions 405–780. Each OTU might correspond to more than one species, following the bacteriological standards (Reference Stackebrandt and GoebelStackebrandt and Goebel, 1994).

The OTUs that contained sequences from Antarctica and temperate environments from other continents were considered ‘cosmopolitan’. The OTUs with sequences from Antarctica and ‘cold’ environments (Arctic, glaciers and deglaciated zones at low latitudes (Andes, Tibet, etc.)) were considered ‘cosmopolitan-cold’. The OTUs with sequences from different regions of Antarctica, but limited to this continent, were considered ‘Antarctic’. The Antarctic OTUs with sequences found only in one region were considered ’Antarctic-regional’. OTU records were classified into areas in two ways: firstly by latitudinal zone and secondly into predefined areas based on the EBA Bioregions version 1.0 maps produced by the Australian Government Antarctic Division (Fig. 1). The OTU numbers were calculated for defined bioregions and latitudinal zones. Abundance information was not used because of the non-quantitative nature of sampling at all locations. Only ‘presence’ data were used in the analyses.

Fig. 1. Map of Antarctica showing localities where terrestrial molecular studies were performed: 1 . South Georgia Island, 2. Signy Island, 3. King George Island, 4. Anchorage Island, 5. Alexander Island, 6. Vestfold Hills, 7. Sør Rondane Mountains, 8. northern Victoria Land, 9. southern Victoria Land, 10. Ellsworth Mountains, 11. Dufek Massif.

Results

Geographic coverage

The spread of localities where cyanobacterial sequences were recorded (Fig. 1 ; Table 1) indicates a large geographic coverage. The latitudinal range extends from the South Orkney Islands (Signy Island, 60° S, 45° W) to the Dufek Massif (828 S, 518 W) located in the Pensacola Mountains (part of the Transantarctic Mountain Range). Around the periphery of the continent, observations have been made at widely spaced localities (Table 1). Moreover, the sampling intensity varied widely in different geographical areas. Only three regions, southern Victoria Land, the Sør Rondane Mountains and Alexander Island, have detailed data on cyanobacteria, while the other localities have much sparser datasets.

Table 1. Locations and the number of cyanobacterial OTUs at the study sites

Latitudinal gradient

Only one study of Antarctic terrestrial communities along a latitudinal gradient that used a uniform molecular methodology exists (Reference Yergeau, Newsham, Pearce and KowalchukYergeau and others, 2007). The transect ranged from the Falkland Islands (518 S, cool temperate zone) through South Georgia (548 S, sub-Antarctic), Signy (608 S, maritime Antarctica), Anchorage (678 S) and Alexander Island (71–72° S) to the Ellsworth Mountains (788 S, continental Antarctica). The study showed that, with the exception of Mars Oasis (Alexander Island), the number of bacterial OTUs decreases with increasing latitude. However, within the transect, cyanobacterial sequences were found in significantly higher proportions at the most southerly locations: Alexander Island and the Ellsworth Mountains (Reference Yergeau, Newsham, Pearce and KowalchukYergeau and others, 2007).

We have plotted the number of OTUs of Antarctic terrestrial cyanobacterial communities on the latitudinal scale. Our results were in line with the data of Reference Yergeau, Newsham, Pearce and KowalchukYergeau and others (2007) and showed a sharp increase in diversity of cyanobacteria in the areas located between 70°S and 80°S (Fig. 2). Further south and further north from this zone, the diversity abruptly decreases.

Fig. 2. The number of OTUs found in geographical areas plotted on the latitudinal scale.

Composition of communities

Fifty-seven per cent (24 of 42 OTUs) of the cyanobacterial OTUs found in Antarctic ice-free areas do not have cultured representatives. The sequences in these OTUs have 87–90% to 97% similarity with sequences of cultured cyanobacteria deposited in GenBank. According to bacteriological standards, it means that potentially new taxa at the species and genus level are present (Reference Tindall, Rossellό-Mόra, Busse, Ludwig and KämpferTindall and others, 2010).

The OTUs that have cultured representatives are assigned to the genera Phormidium (five OTUs), Leptolyngbya (five OTUs) and Nostoc (two OTUs). The genera Coleodesmium, Cyanothece, Geitlerinema, Anabaena, Fischerella and Limnothrix are each represented by one OTU. The majority of these genera belong to the order Oscillatoriales which includes filamentous cyanobacteria without heterocytes and akinetes: Phormidium, Leptolyngbya, Geitlerinema and Limnothrix. The genera Nostoc, Coleodesmium, Anabaena and Fischerella belong to the order Nostocales which includes filamentous cyanobacteria with heterocytes. The genus Cyanothece belongs to the order Chroococcales which includes unicellular cyanobacteria.

Antarctic endemism versus cosmopolitanism

Of the 42 OTUs obtained in Antarctica, the majority had a cosmopolitan distribution (79%, 33 out of 42 OTUs), with a fraction of ‘cosmopolitan-cold’ OTUs of 12% (5/42). Only 21% (10/42) belonged to potential Antarctic endemic taxa, which included potential regional endemics (14%, 6/42). At the regional scale, the highest number of endemic OTUs was found in the richest terrestrial communities of the Sør Rondane Mountains and Alexander Island located between 708 S and 80°S (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. The number of cosmopolitan (‘c’), cosmopolitan-cold (‘cc’), Antarctic-regional (‘Ar’) and Antarctic (‘A’) OTUs in the geographical areas. Sig: Signy Island; Anc: Anchorage Island; NVL: northern Victoria Land; Ell: Ellsworth Mountains; Pen: Pensacola Mountains; Ale: Alexander Island; SRM: Sør Rondane Mountains; SVL: southern Victoria Land.

Comparisons between Antarctic regions

We have compared the composition of cyanobacterial communities of the three richest and most intensively studied regions, separated from each other by a distance of 3000–3400 km. Interestingly, they had a very low degree of similarity with each other (Fig. 4). These results suggest that regional populations in Antarctic ice-free areas probably exist.

Fig. 4. Comparison of the composition of cyanobacterial communities. Ale: Alexander Island; SRM: Sør Rondane Mountains; SVL: southern Victoria Land; c: cosmopolitan OTU; cc: cosmopolitan-cold OTU; Ar: Antarctic-regional; A: Antarctic OTU.

Of the 36 OTUs found in these three areas, 78% (28 of 36 OTUs) were found only in one of the regions. Five OTUs (14%) were shared between two regions. Three of them were Antarctic OTUs (16ST21, 16ST42, 16ST109), one was cosmopolitan (16ST36) and one ‘cosmopolitan-cold’ (16ST11). Only three OTUs (8%) were present in all three regions. All three are cosmopolitan: 16ST44 which belongs to ‘lineage B’ (Reference Siegesmund, Johansen, Karsten and FriedlSiegesmund and others, 2008) that contains the filamentous cyanobacteria Microcoleus vaginatus and Phormidium autumnale, 16ST73 which includes the strain Leptolyngbya sp. ANT.LH52.1 (Reference TatonTaton and others, 2006b) and 16ST88 which does not include any cultured representatives.

Discussion

The data suggest that favourable microclimatic conditions (northward exposition of slopes, availability of meltwater and increase of the soil temperature in full sun, stable substrate for growth and protection from wind) and the ability of cyanobacteria to withstand freezing and desiccation allow the development of terrestrial cyanobacteria in all ice-free areas of Antarctica (Reference Hawes, Howard-Williams and VincentHawes and others, 1992; Reference Elster, Benson, Fuller, Lane and BensonElster and Benson, 2004). Cyanobacteria were found even in the most southerly ice-free areas of Antarctica (86–878 S) (Reference Broady and WeinsteinBroady and Weinstein, 1998).

Latitudinal distribution pattern

The latitudinal analysis of the molecular diversity of cyanobacterial communities shows a sharp increase in diversity in the areas located between 70°S and 808 S. Further south and further north from this zone the diversity decreases.

We cannot exclude that this distribution is biased by a more intensive sampling in the three richest regions (southern Victoria Land, the Sør Rondane Mountains and Alexander Island) located within this latitudinal range. However, our observation is supported by other studies. Reference Yergeau, Newsham, Pearce and KowalchukYergeau and others (2007) showed the increase in cyanobacterial diversity along a transect from 50°S to 70–808 S. These authors have used a standardized molecular method for all samples. Reference HodgsonHodgson and others (2010) showed that cyanobacteria were the dominant life forms in lakes and terrestrial habitats of Dufek Massif (828 S), but that their diversity was much lower than in the regions north to 808 S. However, this is the only study of molecular cyanobacterial diversity south of 808 S.

Assuming our conclusions are correct, we propose the following hypothesis. The increase in biodiversity of cyanobacteria from the sub-Antarctic to continental Antarctica could be explained by disappearance of the vegetation cover (Reference Peat, Clarke and ConveyPeat and others, 2007). Plants and mosses limit the amount of nutrients available for cyanobacteria, reduce the amount of light reaching the cyanobacterial crusts and replace cyanobacteria in the last stages of succession (Reference DunneDunne, 1989; Reference Büdel, Buscot and VarmaBüdel, 2005). The cyanobacteria may have lower rates of photosynthesis than eukaryotic organisms, but cyanobacteria are particularly well adapted to low temperatures and freezing (Reference Elster, Benson, Fuller, Lane and BensonElster and Benson, 2004). When plants and mosses are absent from an ecosystem, the cyanobacteria may have an advantage. This observation is also supported by the fact that the majority of sequences obtained north of 708 S were misinterpreted as cyanobacterial, but in fact they belonged to chloroplasts of green algae and mosses (Reference Yergeau, Newsham, Pearce and KowalchukYergeau and others, 2007; Reference Chong, Pearce, Convey, Tan, Wong and TanChong and others, 2010). Further south of 808 S, the diversity of cyanobacteria decreases, probably due to harsher environmental conditions (Reference HodgsonHodgson and others, 2010). This is supported by the low cyanobacterial diversity found in the La Gorce Mountains using a floristic approach (Reference Broady and WeinsteinBroady and Weinstein, 1998).

Comparison with limnetic communities

Direct comparison between terrestrial and limnetic molecular cyanobacterial diversity is not possible because there are no data along a latitudinal transect in the Antarctic Peninsula. The only available data come from the three regions located in continental Antarctica, but not from maritime Antarctica. These are the southern Victoria Land, Pensacola Mountains/Shackleton Range and Prydz Bay oases (Reference PriscuPriscu and others, 1998; Reference VincentVincent, 2000; Reference Nadeau, Milbrandt and CastenholzNadeau and others, 2001; Reference Taton, Grubisic, Brambilla, De Wit and WilmotteTaton and others, 2003, Reference Taton, Grubisic, Balthasart, Hodgson, Laybourn-Parry and Wilmotte2006a,Reference Tatonb; Reference JungblutJungblut and others, 2005; Reference Mosier, Murray and FritsenMosier and others, 2007).

In the past, many cyanobacterial OTUs from Antarctic lakes have been identified as possibly endemic (Reference Taton, Grubisic, Brambilla, De Wit and WilmotteTaton and others, 2003, Reference Taton, Grubisic, Balthasart, Hodgson, Laybourn-Parry and Wilmotte2006a,Reference Tatonb). However, when new sequences from different geographic areas were added to GenBank, the patterns changed. New studies revealed that many OTUs, earlier identified as endemic to Antarctica, in fact have a global distribution (Reference Dorador, Vila, Imhoff and WitzelDorador and others, 2008; Reference Jungblut, Lovejoy and VincentJungblut and others, 2010). At present, when the 97.5% 16S rRNA similarity value is used for the OTU definition, Antarctic limnetic environments appear dominated by cosmopolitan cyanobacteria.

Dominance of cosmopolitan cyanobacteria

The majority of OTUs of Antarctic terrestrial cyanobacteria have a cosmopolitan distribution (79%, 33 out of 42 OTUs). These data are in agreement with earlier observations that used a floristic approach. Indeed, according to Reference BroadyBroady (1996), the Antarctic terrestrial cyanobacteria are mostly represented by cosmopolitan taxa.

There are two possibilities to explain the origin of cosmopolitan cyanobacteria in Antarctica. They could have colonized Antarctica (1) after the Last Glacial Maximum (∼18 000 years ago) or (2) before.

  1. 1. An example of a recent colonization of the Antarctic continent by cyanobacteria from other continents was suggested by the finding of a cosmopolitan thermophilic cyanobacterium on the fumarolic ground of Mount Erebus (Reference Melick, Broady and RowanMelick and others, 1991; Reference Broady and FriedmannBroady, 1993). According to Reference BroadyBroady (1996), ‘eruptions of the Antarctic volcanoes in recent centuries would probably have destroyed any earlier biota and recolonization by propagules from outside the region would then be required’. Reference Soo, Wood, Grzymski, McDonald and CarySoo and others (2009) found chimeric sequences of the thermophilic cyanobacterium Fischerella sp. in the fumarolic ground of Mount Erebus. After analysis of these sequences, we found that the first 600–630 BP have up to 98% similarity with the cosmopolitan thermophile Fischerella muscicola PCC 7414 (OTU 16ST101). The closest geothermal habitats are located in New Zealand, >4000km away. Several studies have investigated possible means of transportation of bacteria to Antarctica (Reference Schlichting, Speziale and ZinkSchlichting and others, 1978; Reference MarshallMarshall, 1996; Reference VincentVincent, 2000; Reference Pearce, Bridge, Hughes, Sattler, Psenner and RussellPearce and others, 2009). Viable bacteria could be transported by wind, oceanic currents or by other organisms (e.g. migrating birds and humans). More information would be needed on the aerial dispersal of cyanobacteria, as well as by other living organisms.

  2. 2. Another hypothesis suggests that cosmopolitan cyanobacteria were present in Antarctica before the glaciations and survived in refugia (mountain ranges and nunataks, subglacial lakes, etc.). Taking into account a molecular clock rate estimation of 1% 16S rRNA gene divergence per 50 × 1 0 6 years (Ma), the Antarctic cyanobacteria could have been present on the continent even before the Gondwana supercontinent broke up (>100–65 Ma) (Reference Ochman and WilsonOchman and Wilson, 1987). At this time, Antarctica had a tropical to subtropical climate as the first ice began to appear only around 40 Ma (Reference ConveyConvey and others, 2008). Further glaciations could have served as a ‘filter’, selecting freeze-tolerant species that later recolonized Antarctic ice-free areas

Regional populations of cyanobacteria

Regional populations of Antarctic cyanobacteria seem to exist, as shown by the low degree of similarity between communities from southern Victoria Land, the Sør Rondane Mountains and Alexander Island located in the same latitudinal range. The observed distribution of cyanobacteria may indicate different environmental conditions in these areas or the existence of obstacles to the dissemination processes within the continent (Reference MartinyMartiny and others, 2006). A possible regional endemicity of eukaryotes in Antarctic soils was suggested earlier by Reference Lawley, Ripley, Bridge and ConveyLawley and others (2004).

However, we cannot exclude the possibility of some biases introduced by the existing molecular approach (Reference Von Wintzingerode, Göbel and Stackebrandtvon Wintzingerode and others, 1997). Certain OTUs could be present in low abundance in the original environment, but not detected. This could affect the degree of similarity between different regional communities. The use of high-throughput sequencing techniques could potentially solve this problem as they should also detect the less abundant sequences (Reference Reeder and KnightReeder and Knight, 2009).

Suggestions for Future Research

Wider geographical coverage

Long transects from Signy Island to the most southerly ice-free areas like the La Gorce Mountains and similar transects along the Victoria Land mountains and the Transantarctic Mountains are necessary. In addition, more coastal ice-free areas (i.e. Schirmacher and Syowa Oases, the Framnes, Scott and Prince Charles Mountains, Bunger Hills, Ford Ranges, Ahlmannryggen, etc.) should be studied by molecular methods.

Standardized molecular approach

The comparison of different microbial communities is possible only when the same genes and parts of genes are analysed. For this purpose, we suggest using as a minimal standard the sequence of the 16S rRNA gene between E. coli positions 405 and 780 which includes the V3 and V4 variable regions. Longer sequences are better for phylogenetic analyses, but if only partial sequences can be obtained, they should encompass the same regions. This is especially important for high-throughput sequencing that only generates short reads.

More variable markers and importance of culture isolation

Study of the evolutionary history of each species of cyanobacteria requires molecular markers that are much more variable than the 16S rRNA gene. The use of ITS sequences was already proposed by Reference Wilmotte and BryantWilmotte (1994) to investigate intra-species variability. Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) could also be used for this purpose (Reference MaidenMaiden and others, 1998). This approach requires the isolation of cyanobacterial cultures from geographically distinct areas and analysis of several loci from each isolate. The overall sensitivity of this approach can be higher than use of a single locus.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office through the ANTAR-IMPACT and BELDIVA projects and the FRS-FNRS (Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (Belgium)) through the FRFC BIPOLES project, and the funding CC CH.1.5.104.04 and the programme of the Russian Academy of Sciences ‘Biosphere Origin and Evolution’. Z. Namsaraev has a postdoctoral mobility fellowship of the FRS-FNRS. A. Wilmotte is a research associate of the FRS-FNRS. M.-J. Mano has a FRIA fellowship from the FRS-FNRS.

References

Aislabie, J.M. and 6 others. 2006. Dominant bacteria in soils of Marble Point and Wright Valley, Victoria Land, Antarctica. Soil Biol. Biochem., 38(10), 30413056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashelford, K.E., Chuzhanova, N.A., Fry, J.C., Jones, A.J. and Weightman, A.J.. 2005. At least 1 in 20 16S rRNA sequence records currently held in public repositories is estimated to contain substantial anomalies. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 71(12), 77247736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broady, P.A. 1993. Soils heated by volcanism. In Friedmann, E.I., ed. Antarctic microbiology. New York, Wiley-Liss, 413432.Google Scholar
Broady, P.A. 1996. Diversity, distribution and dispersal of Antarctic terrestrial algae. Biodiv. Conserv., 5(11), 13071335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broady, P.A. and Weinstein, R.N.. 1998. Algae, lichens and fungi in La Gorce Mountains, Antarctica. Antarct. Sci., 10(4), 376385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büdel, B. 2005. Microorganisms on biological crusts on soil surfaces. In Buscot, F. and Varma, A., eds. Microorganisms in soils: roles in genesis and functions. Berlin, etc., Springer. (Soil Biology 3.)Google Scholar
Cameron, R.E. 1972. Farthest south algae and associated bacteria. Phycologia, 11(2), 133139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, R.E., Lacy, G.H., Morelli, F.A. and Marsh, J.B.. 1971. Farthest south soil microbial and ecological investigations. Antarct. J. US, 6(4), 105106.Google Scholar
Chong, C.W. and 6 others. 2009. Environmental influences on bacterial diversity of soils on Signy Island, maritime Antarctic. Polar Biol., 32(11), 15711582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, C.W., Pearce, D.A., Convey, P., Tan, G.Y.A., Wong, R.C.S. and Tan, I.K.P.. 2010. High levels of spatial heterogeneity in the biodiversity of soil prokaryotes on Signy Island, Antarctica. Soil Biol. Biochem., 42(4), 601610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Convey, P. 2006. Antarctic terrestrial ecosystems: responses to environmental change. Polarforschung, 75(2–3), 101111.Google Scholar
Convey, P. and 6 others. 2008. Antarctic terrestrial life: challenging the history of the frozen continent? Biol. Rev., 83(2), 103117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De la Torre, J., Goebel, B.M., Friedmann, E.I. and Pace, N.R.. 2003. Microbial diversity of cryptoendolithic communities from the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 69(7), 38583867.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De los Ríos, A., Grube, M., Sancho, L.G. and Ascaso, C.. 2007. Ultrastructural and genetic characteristics of endolithic cyanobacterial biofilms colonizing Antarctic granite rocks. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 59(2), 386395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Wever, A. and 7 others. 2009. Hidden levels of phylodiversity in Antarctic green algae: further evidence for the existence of glacial refugia. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. B, 276(1673), 35913599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dorador, C., Vila, I., Imhoff, J.F. and Witzel, K.-P.. 2008. Cyanobacterial diversity in Salar de Huasco, a high altitude saline wetland in northern Chile: an example of geographical dispersion? FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 64(3), 419432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunne, J. 1989. Crypotogamic soil crusts in arid ecosystems. Rangelands, 11(4), 180182.Google Scholar
Elster, J. and Benson, E.E.. 2004. Life in the polar terrestrial environment with a focus on algae and cyanobacteria. In Fuller, B.J., Lane, N. and Benson, E.E., eds. Life in the frozen state. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 111149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, E.I. 1982. Endolithic microorganisms in the Antarctic cold desert. Science, 215(4536), 10451053.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawes, I., Howard-Williams, C. and Vincent, W.F.. 1992. Desiccation and recovery of Antarctic cyanobacterial mats. Polar Biol., 12(6–7), 587594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, D.A. and 11 others. 2010. The limnology and biology of the Dufek Massif, Transantarctic Mountains 828 South. Polar Sci., 4(2), 197214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungblut, A.D. and 6 others. 2005. Diversity within cyanobacterial mat communities in variable salinity meltwater ponds of McMurdo Ice Shelf, Antarctica. Environ. Microbiol., 7(4), 519529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jungblut, A.D., Lovejoy, C. and Vincent, W.F.. 2010. Global distribution of cyanobacterial ecotypes in the cold biosphere. Int. Soc. Microb. Ecol. J., 4(2), 191202.Google ScholarPubMed
Lawley, B., Ripley, S., Bridge, P. and Convey, P.. 2004. Molecular analysis of geographic patterns of eukaryotic diversity in Antarctic soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 70(10), 59635972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, W. and 31 others. 2004. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucl. Acids Res., 32(4), 13631371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maiden, M.C.J. and 12 others. 1998. Multilocus sequence typing: a portable approach to the identification of clones within populations of pathogenic microorganisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (PNAS), 95(6), 31403145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, , W.A. 1996. Biological particles over Antarctica. Nature, 383(6602), 680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martiny, J.B.H. and 15 others. 2006. Microbial biogeography: putting microorganisms on the map. Nature Rev. Microbiol., 4(2), 102112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melick, D.R., Broady, P.A. and Rowan, K.S.. 1991. Morphological and physiological characteristics of a non-heterocystous strain of the cyanobacterium Mastigocladus laminosus Cohn from fumarolic soil on Mt Erebus, Antarctica. Polar Biol., 11(2), 8189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosier, A.C., Murray, A.E. and Fritsen, C.H.. 2007. Microbiota within the perennial ice cover of Lake Vida, Antarctica. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 59(2), 274288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, T.-L., Milbrandt, E.C. and Castenholz, R.W.. 2001. Evolutionary relationships of cultivated Antarctic oscillatorians (cyanobacteria). J. Phycol., 37(4), 650654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niederberger, T.D. and 6 others. 2008. Microbial community composition in soils of Northern Victoria Land, Antarctica. Environ. Microbiol., 10(7), 17131724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochman, H. and Wilson, A.C.. 1987. Evolution in bacteria: evidence for a universal substitution rate in cellular genomes. J. Mol. Evol., 26(1–2), 7486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearce, D.A., Bridge, P.D., Hughes, K.A., Sattler, B., Psenner, R. and Russell, N.J.. 2009. Microorganisms in the atmosphere over Antarctica. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 69(2), 143157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peat, H.J., Clarke, A. and Convey, P.. 2007. Diversity and biogeography of the Antarctic flora. J. Biogeogr., 34(1), 132146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pointing, S.B., Chan, Y., Lacap, D.C., Lau, M.C.Y., Jurgens, J.A. and Farrell, R.L.. 2009. Highly specialized microbial diversity in hyper-arid polar desert. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (PNAS), 106(47), 19,96419,969.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Priscu, J.C. and 9 others. 1998. Perennial Antarctic lake ice: an oasis for life in a polar desert. Science, 280(5372), 20952098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeder, J. and Knight, R.. 2009. The ‘rare biosphere’: a reality check. Nature Meth., 6(9), 636637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlichting, H.E., Speziale, B.J. and Zink, R.M.. 1978. Dispersal of algae and protozoa by Antarctic flying birds. Antarct. J. US, 13(4), 147149.Google Scholar
Schloss, P.D. and Handelsman, J.. 2005. Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 71(3), 15011506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegesmund, M.A., Johansen, J.R., Karsten, U. and Friedl, T.. 2008. Coleofasciculus gen. nov. (Cyanobacteria): morphological and molecular criteria for revision of the genus Microcoleus gomont . J. Phycol., 44(6), 15721585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, M.C., Bowman, J.P., Scott, F.J. and Line, M.A.. 2000. Sublithic bacteria associated with Antarctic quartz stones. Antarct. Sci., 12(2), 177184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soo, R.M., Wood, S.A., Grzymski, J.J., McDonald, I.R. and Cary, S.C.. 2009. Microbial biodiversity of thermophilic communities in hot mineral soils of Tramway Ridge, Mount Erebus, Antarctica. Environ. Microbiol., 11(3), 715728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stackebrandt, E. and Goebel, B.M.. 1994. Taxonomic note: a place for DNA–DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int. J. Syst. Microbiol., 44(4), 846849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taton, A., Grubisic, S., Brambilla, E., De Wit, R. and Wilmotte, A.. 2003. Cyanobacterial diversity in natural and artificial microbial mats of Lake Fryxell (McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica): a morphological and molecular approach. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 69(9), 51575169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taton, A., Grubisic, S., Balthasart, P., Hodgson, D.A., Laybourn-Parry, J. and Wilmotte, A.. 2006a. Biogeographical distribution and ecological ranges of benthic cyanobacteria in East Antarctic lakes. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 57(2), 272289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taton, A. and 10 others. 2006b. Polyphasic study of Antarctic cyanobacterial strains. J. Phycol., 42(6), 12571270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teixeira, L.C.R.S. and 6 others. 2010. Bacterial diversity in rhizo-sphere soil from Antarctic vascular plants of Admiralty Bay, maritime Antarctica. Int. Soc. Microb. Ecol. J., 4(8), 9891001.Google Scholar
Tindall, B.J., Rossellό-Mόra, R., Busse, H.-J., Ludwig, W. and Kämpfer, P.. 2010. Notes on the characterization of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 60(1), 249266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vincent, W.F. 2000. Evolutionary origins of Antarctic microbiota: invasion, selection and endemism. Antarct. Sci., 12(3), 374385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Wintzingerode, F., Göbel, U.B. and Stackebrandt, E.. 1997. Determination of microbial diversity in environmental samples: pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 21(3), 213229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilmotte, A. 1994. Molecular evolution and taxonomy of the Cyanobacteria. In Bryant, D.A., ed. The molecular biology of Cyanobacteria. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic, 125.Google Scholar
Wood, S.A., Rueckert, A., Cowan, D.A. and Cary, S.C.. 2008. Sources of edaphic cyanobacterial diversity in the Dry Valleys of Eastern Antarctica. Int. Soc. Microb. Ecol. J., 2(3), 308320.Google ScholarPubMed
Yergeau, E., Newsham, K.K., Pearce, D.A. and Kowalchuk, G.A.. 2007. Patterns of bacterial diversity across a range of Antarctic terrestrial habitats. Environ. Microbiol., 9(11), 26702682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 81
Total number of PDF views: 215 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 14th September 2017 - 16th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

You have Access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Biogeography of terrestrial cyanobacteria from Antarctic ice-free areas
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Biogeography of terrestrial cyanobacteria from Antarctic ice-free areas
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Biogeography of terrestrial cyanobacteria from Antarctic ice-free areas
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *