Skip to main content Accessibility help

Role of early experience in the development of preference for low-quality food in sheep

  • F. Catanese (a1) (a2), R. A. Distel (a1) (a2), R. M. Rodríguez Iglesias (a2) and J. J. Villalba (a3)


Domestic ruminant selectivity induces floristic changes in pasturelands, risking sustainability and limiting the subsequent availability of susceptible plant species. Development of preferences for species of lower nutritional quality may help to overcome those problems. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that early experience of sheep with a low-quality food (LQF) in a nutritional enriched context increases preference for LQF in adulthood. We predicted a higher proportional consumption of LQF in experienced lambs (EL) than in inexperienced lambs (IL) in choice situations involving LQF and alternative foods. Additionally, we determined intake of LQF by EL and IL at different levels of high-quality food (HQF) availability. From 60 to 210 days of age, EL were fed in separated feed bunks mature oat hay (LQF) simultaneously with sunflower meal (SM) and corn grain (CG), whereas IL were fed alfalfa hay (HQF) simultaneously with SM and CG. After exposure, EL and IL were offered LQF in free choice situations involving alternative foods, and also at five levels of HQF availability (100%, 75%, 50%, 25% and 0% of ad libitum intake). Proportional consumption of LQF was lower or similar in EL than IL. Intake of LQF was also lower or similar in EL than IL at all levels of HQF availability, except when the LQF was the only food available. Our results did not support the hypothesis that early experience with a LQF in a nutritional enriched context increases preference for LQF in adulthood. On the contrary, experience with LQF diminished subsequent preference for LQF in adulthood. It is proposed that, in the conditions of our study, continuous comparison between the LQF and the high-quality supplements (CG and SM) during the early exposure period lead to devaluation of LQF by EL through a simultaneous negative contrast effect.


Corresponding author


Hide All
AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists) 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA.
Baraza, E, Villalba, JJ, Provenza, FD 2005. Nutritional context influences preferences of lambs for foods with plant secondary metabolites. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 92, 293305.
Bergvall, UA, Balogh, ACV 2009. Consummatory simultaneous positive and negative contrast in fallow deer: implications for selectivity. Mammalian Biology 74, 236239.
Bergvall, UA, Rautio, P, Tuomas, L, Leimar, O 2007. A test of simultaneous and successive negative contrast in fallow deer foraging behavior. Animal Behaviour 74, 395402.
Berteaux, D, Crete, M, Huot, J, Maltais, J, Ouellet, JP 1998. Food choice by white-tailed deer in relation to protein and energy content of the diet: a field experiment. Oecologia 115, 8492.
Distel, RA, Provenza, FD 1991. Experience early in life affects voluntary intake of black brush by goats. Journal of Chemical Ecology 17, 431450.
Distel, RA, Villalba, JJ, Laborde, HE 1994. Effects of early experience on voluntary intake of low-quality roughage by sheep. Journal of Animal Science 72, 11911195.
Distel, RA, Villalba, JJ, Laborde, HE, Burgos, MA 1996. Persistence of the effects of early experience on consumption of low-quality roughage by sheep. Journal of Animal Science 74, 965968.
Flaherty, CF 1996. Incentive Relativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Flaherty, CF, Blitzer, R, Collier, GH 1978. Open field behaviors elicited by reward reduction. The American Journal of Psychology 91, 429443.
Flaherty, CF, Troncoso, B, Deschu, N 1979. Open field behaviors correlated with reward availability and reward shift in three rat strains. American Journal of Psychology 92, 385400.
Goering, HK, Van Soest, PJ 1970. Forage Fiber Analyses, Agricultural Handbook 379. USDA, Washington, DC, USA.
Littell, RC, Henry, PR, Ammerman, CB 1998. Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. Journal of Animal Science 76, 12161231.
McEachern, MB, Eagles-Sith, CA, Efferson, CM, Van Vuren, DH 2006. Evidence for local specialization in a generalist mammalian herbivore, Neotoma fuscipes. Oikos 113, 440448.
Milchunas, DG, Sala, OE, Lauenroth, WK 1988. A generalized model of the effects of grazing by large herbivores on grassland community structure. American Naturalist 132, 87106.
Milne, JA, Macrae, JC, Spence, AM, Wilson, S 1978. A comparison of the voluntary intake and digestion of a range of forages at different times of the year by the sheep and the Red deer (Cervus elaphus). The British Journal of Nutrition 40, 347357.
Moore, JE, Brant, MH, Kunkle, WE, Hopkins, DI 1999. Effects of supplementation on voluntary forage intake, diet digestibility, and animal performance. Journal of Animal Science 77 (Suppl. 2), 122135.
Nolte, DL, Provenza, FD, Balph, DF 1990. The establishment and persistence of food preferences in lambs exposed to selected foods. Journal of Animal Science 68, 9981002.
NRC (National Research Council) 1985. Nutrient Requirements of Sheep, 6th edition. National Academy of Sciences – National Research Council, Washington, DC, USA.
Pellegrini, S, Mustaca, A 2000. Consummatory successive negative contrast with solid food. Learning and Motivation 31, 200209.
Provenza, FD 1996. Acquired aversions as the basis for varied diets of ruminants foraging on rangelands. Journal of Animal Science 74, 20102020.
Provenza, FD, Balph, DF 1987. Diet learning by domestic ruminants: theory, evidence and practical implications. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 18, 211232.
Provenza, FD, Balph, DF 1988. Development of dietary choice in livestock on rangelands and its implications for management. Journal of Animal Science 66, 23562368.
Provenza, FD, Lynch, JJ, Cheney, CD 1995. Effects of a flavor and food restriction on the intake of novel foods by sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 43, 8393.
Provenza, FD, Villalba, JJ, Dziba, LE, Atwood, SB, Banner, RE 2003. Linking herbivore experience, varied diets, and plant biochemical diversity. Small Ruminant Research 49, 257274.
Russel, A 1991. Body condition scoring of sheep. In Sheep and Goat Practice (ed. E Boden), pp. 310. Bailliere Tindall, London, UK.
Shaw, RA, Provenza, FD, Villalba, JJ 2006. Resource availability and quality influence patterns of diet mixing by sheep. Journal of Chemical Ecology 32, 12671278.
Squibb, RC, Provenza, FD, Balph, DF 1990. Effect of age of exposure on consumption of a shrub by sheep. Journal of Animal Science 68, 987997.
Villalba, JJ, Provenza, FD 2000. Roles of novelty, generalization and post-ingestive feedback in the recognition of foods by lambs. Journal of Animal Science 78, 30603069.


Role of early experience in the development of preference for low-quality food in sheep

  • F. Catanese (a1) (a2), R. A. Distel (a1) (a2), R. M. Rodríguez Iglesias (a2) and J. J. Villalba (a3)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed