Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T02:00:47.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Voluntary Trap Approval scheme to end trap welfare inequality in the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

SE Baker
SE Baker*
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Tubney House, Abingdon Road, Tubney, Oxfordshire OX13 5QL, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Spring traps are widely used for killing small mammals in the UK. By UK law, most spring traps are required to meet welfare approval standards, but break-back traps for rats (Rattus norvegicus) and mice (Mus musculus), and all mole (Talpa europaea) traps, are exempt. I argue that these exemptions are unjustified and should be repealed. Given that this is unlikely to happen soon, I propose an alternative approach — a ‘Voluntary Trap Approval (VTA)’ scheme, which could drive the necessary change via ‘carrot’ rather than ‘stick’. Such a scheme might benefit the welfare of many thousands of animals each year.

Type
Letter
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , February 2017 , pp. 131 - 133
Copyright
© 2017 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, RPD, Macdonald, DW and Johnson, PJ 1994 The status of the European mole Talpa europea L as an agricultural pest and its management. Mammal Review 24(2): 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.1994.tb00136.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, SE, Ellwood, SA, Johnson, PJ and Macdonald, DW 2016 Moles and mole control on British farms, amenities and gardens after strychnine withdrawal. Animals 6(6): 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6060039CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, SE, Ellwood, SA, Tagarielli, VL and Macdonald, DW 2012 Mechanical performance of rat, mouse and mole spring traps, and possible implications for welfare performance. PLoS ONE 7(6): e39334. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039334CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, SE, Shaw, RF, Atkinson, RPD, West, P and Macdonald, DW 2015 Potential welfare impacts of kill-trapping European moles (Talpa europaea) using scissor traps and Duffus traps: a post-mortem examination study. Animal Welfare 24: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.24.1.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, S, Fenwick, N, Baker, L, Baker, S, Beausoleil, N, Carter, S, Cartwright, B, Costa, F, Draper, C, Griffin, J, Grogan, A, Howald, G, Jones, B, Littin, K, Lombard, A, Mellor, D, Ramp, D, Ryan, E, Schuppli, C, Sharp, T and Fraser, D 2017 Consensus principles for ethical wildlife control. Conservation Biology, in pressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISO 1999 TC191. Animal (Mammal) Traps. Part 4: Methods for Testing Killing Trap Systems used on Land or Underwater. International Standard ISO/DIS 10990-4. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
Mason, G and Littin, K 2003 The humaneness of rodent pest control. Animal Welfare 12: 1–37Google Scholar
Mellor, DJ, Patterson-Kane, E and Stafford, KJ 2009 The Sciences of Animal Welfare. Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Natural England 2010 The Animal Welfare Act 2006: What it Means for Wildlife; The Animal Welfare Act 2006: What it Means for Wildlife; Natural England: Sheffield, UK. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160930000001/http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/23021Google Scholar
Proulx, G and Barrett, M 1991 Evaluation of the Bionic trap to quickly kill mink (Mustela vison) in simulated natural environments. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 27(2): 276–280. https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-27.2.276CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rudge, AJB 1963 A study of mole-trapping. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 149: 330–334Google Scholar
Scott Henderson, J 1951 Report of the Committee on Cruelty to Wild Animals. Home Office/Scottish Home Department, Cmd 8266, June 1951. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Talling, JC and Inglis, IR 2009 Improvements to trapping standards. DG ENV. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.306.7379&rep=rep1&type=pdfGoogle Scholar
The Law Commission 2012 Wildlife Law: A Consultation Paper. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office: London, UK. http://www.law-com.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/LCCP206 Wildlife law consultation paper for web.pdfGoogle Scholar