Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T10:38:19.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transcranial magnetic stunning of broilers: a preliminary trial to induce unconsciousness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

E Lambooij*
Affiliation:
Wageningen UR, Livestock Research, PO Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
H Anil
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, Langford BS40 5DU, UK
SR Butler
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, Burden Neurological Institute, Bristol BS16 1JB, UK
H Reimert
Affiliation:
Wageningen UR, Livestock Research, PO Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
L Workel
Affiliation:
Wageningen UR, Livestock Research, PO Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
V Hindle
Affiliation:
Wageningen UR, Livestock Research, PO Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: bert.lambooij@wur.nl

Abstract

This study was performed to identify whether non-focal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with an adapted coil for broilers has the potential for use as a non-invasive stunning method for broilers. Application of the TMS probe resulted in dominance of theta and delta waves and appearance of spikes in the electroencephalogram (EEG) after stimulation. Correlation dimension (CD) analyses of the EEG signals recorded prior to and following the application of TMS suggested that the birds might be unconscious for approximately 15 to 20 s assuming that a reduction in CD to 60% of the baseline value indicates unconsciousness. Other observations included loss of behavioural arousal or muscle tone (muscle flaccidity), and irregular heart rate after TMS. It can be suggested that TMS has the potential to be developed as a stunning method in the future. The technique, evaluated using small number of broilers in this study, requires further improvement and the use of a power supply optimised in future research. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain has potential for application as a non-invasive stunning method for broilers, which could be acceptable to some religious groups opposed to the use of established or conventional stunning methods.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2011 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anil, MH, Butler, SR, Johnson, CB and McKinstry, JL 2000 Suppression of somatosensory evoked potentials by transcranial magnetic stimulation in the rabbit. Proceedings Physiological Society pp 526Google Scholar
Bilgili, SF 1999 Recent advances in electrical stunning. Poultry Science 78: 282286CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coenen, AML and van den Broek, PLC 2005 Correlation dimension of the chicken EEG during sleeping, waking and drowsiness. Nederlandse Vereniging voor Slaap-Waak Onderzoek, Heeze Nederland 16: 4346Google Scholar
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2004 Scientific Report of the Scientific Panel for Animal Health and Welfare. AHAW/04-027. Welfare aspects of stunning and killing methods. EFSA: Parma, ItalyGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, PB, Fountain, S and Daskalakis, ZJ 2006 A comprehensive review of the effects of rTMS on motor cortical excitability and inhibition. Clinical Neurophysiology 117: 25842596CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GenStat Release 2008 GenStat Release 11.1. VSN International Ltd: Hemel Hempstead, UKGoogle Scholar
George, MS 2003 Stimulating the brain. Scientific American, September: 4753. www.sciam.comGoogle Scholar
Knight, AC and Anil, MH 2003 EC Accompanying Measure QLK2-CT-2002-30531 UK Food Standards Agency M03022. Review of current stunning methods for cattle and sheep that avoid the risk of dissemination of brain particles into the blood and carcass, and maintain good welfare and operator safety standards. www.safestun.comGoogle Scholar
Kooi, KA, Tucker, RP and Marshal, RR 1978 Fundamentals of Electro-encephalography, Second Edition. Harper and Row: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Lambooij, E 2004 Electrical stunning. In: Jensen, WK, Devine, C and Dikeman, M (eds) Encyclopedia of Meat Sciences pp 13421348. Elsevier: Oxford, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambooij, E, Reimert, H, van de Vis, JW and Gerritzen, MA 2008 Head-to-cloaca electrical stunning of broilers. Poultry Science 87: 21602165CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopes da Silva, HF 1983 The assessment of consciousness: general principles and practical aspects. In: Eikelenboom, G (ed) Stunning of Animals for Slaughter pp 312. Martinus Nijhoff: The Hague, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Lisanby, SH 2002 Update on magnetic seizure therapy: a novel form of convulsive therapy. Journal of ECT 18(4): 182188CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKeegan, DEF, McIntyre, JA, Demmers, TGM, Lowe, JC, Wathes, CM, van den Broek, PLC, Coenen, AML and Gentle, MJ 2007 Physiological and behavioural responses of broilers to controlled atmosphere stunning: implications for welfare. Animal Welfare 16: 409426Google Scholar
Mills, KR 1999 Magnetic Stimulation of the Human Nervous System. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Raj, ABM 2003 A critical appraisal of electrical stunning in chickens. World's Poultry Science Journal 59: 8998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sances, A and Larson, SJ 1975 Electroanaesthsia. Academic Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
van den Broek, PLC 2003 Monitoring anaesthetic depth. Modification, evaluation and application of the correlation dimension. PhD Thesis, Nijmegen University Press, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
van den Broek, PLC, van Egmond, J, van Rijn, CM, Takens, F, Coenen, AML and Booij, LHDJ 2005 Feasibility of real-time calculation of correlation integral derived statistics applied to EEG time series. Physica D 203: 198208CrossRefGoogle Scholar