Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T22:06:53.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time course of changes in egg-shell quality, faecal corticosteroids and behaviour as welfare measures in laying hens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

MS Dawkins ,
A Edmond ,
A Lord ,
S Solomon  and
M Bain
MS Dawkins*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK
A Edmond
Affiliation:
Division of Veterinary Anatomy, Glasgow Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1QH, Scotland, UK
A Lord
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK
S Solomon
Affiliation:
Division of Veterinary Anatomy, Glasgow Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1QH, Scotland, UK
M Bain
Affiliation:
Division of Veterinary Anatomy, Glasgow Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1QH, Scotland, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: marian.dawkins@zoo.ox.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the extent to which three non-invasive measures of welfare in laying hens (egg-shell quality, corticosteroid levels as measured from the birds' faeces, and behavioural preferences) were correlated over a period of five days in two groups of birds. One group had access to an enriched test area (bark chips on the floor and a tray of sprouted wheat); the other group had access to a comparably sized barren area (bare wire mesh floor). The measure of preference used was the amount of time hens spent in the test area as measured each day. It was predicted that birds with access to the less preferred environment would show higher levels of faecal corticosteroids and egg-shell anomalies. However, although the birds showed a preference for the enriched environment from Day 1, the other two measures did not follow the same pattern. Faecal corticosteroid metabolites showed an initial increase in both groups, which declined significantly by Day 4, with the ‘enriched’ birds in fact showing a trend for higher levels than the ‘barren’ birds. Shell thickness also showed a change over the five days, but with a different time course: declining to a minimal level on Day 3 and then rising again by Day 5. No measure of shell quality was significantly different between the two environments, but there was a trend for changes in shell thickness to be more pronounced in eggs from enriched birds. The results indicate the caution that needs to be exercised in using shell quality or corticosteroid measurements in isolation from assessments of what the animals themselves prefer.

Keywords

animal welfarebehaviourcorticosteroidhenspreferenceshell quality
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , August 2004 , pp. 321 - 327
Copyright
© 2004 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bain, MM 1990 Egg-shell strength: a mechanical–ultrastructural evaluation. PhD Thesis, University of Glasgow, UKGoogle Scholar
Beuving, G and Vonder, GMA 1977 Daily rhythm of corticosterone in laying hens and the influence of egg-laying. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 51: 169–173CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beuving, G and Vonder, GMA 1981 The influence of ovulation and oviposition on corticosterone levels in the plasma of laying hens. General and Comparative Endocrinology 44: 382–388CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brackpool, CE 1995 Egg-shell structure as an indicator of egg-shell quality in laying hens. PhD Thesis, University of New England, USAGoogle Scholar
Brackpool, CE, Roberts, JR, Hecker, J and Hughes, R 1993 How heat stress affects egg-shell structure. In: Proceedings of the 9th Australian Poultry and Feed Convention p 225, Gold Coast, Queensland, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Broom, DM 1988 The scientific assessment of animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 20: 5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Causey Whittow, G 2000 Sturkie's Avian Physiology. Academic Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Cockrem, JF and Rounce, JR 1994 Faecal measurements of oestradiol and testosterone allow the non-invasive estimation of plasma steroid concentrations in the domestic fowl. British Poultry Science 35: 433–443CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawkins, MS 1980 Animal Suffering: The Science of Animal Welfare. Chapman and Hall: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, MS 1990 From an animal's point of view: motivation, fitness and animal welfare. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 1–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, MS 1998 Evolution and animal welfare. The Quarterly Review of Biology 73: 305–328CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dehnhard, M, Schreer, A, Krone, O, Jewgenow, K, Krause, M and Grossman, R 2003 Measurement of plasma corticosterone and fecal glucocorticoid metabolites in the chicken (Gallus domesticus), the great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), and the goshawk (Accipiter gentilis). General and Comparative Endrocrinology 131: 345–352CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Jong, IC, Dinand Ekkel, E, van de Burgwal, JA, Lambooij, E, Mechiel Korte, S, Ruis, MAW, Koolhaas, JM and Blokhuis, HJ 1998 Effects of straw bedding on physiological responses to stressors and behaviour in growing pigs. Physiology and Behavior 64: 303–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, AC 1996 Environmental and physiological factors influencing the formation of the egg-shell in the domestic fowl. PhD Thesis, University of Glasgow, UKGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D and Matthews, LR 1997 Preference and motivation testing. In: Appleby, MC and Hughes, BO (eds) Animal Welfare pp 159–173. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Harvey, S and Phillips, JG 1982 Adrenocortical responses of ducks to treadmill exercise. Journal of Endocrinology 94: 141–146CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hincke, MT, Bernard, A-M, Lee, ER, Tsang, CPW and Narbaitz, R 1992 Soluble protein constituents of the domestic fowl's egg-shell. British Poultry Science 33: 505–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, BO, Gilbert, AB and Brown, MF 1986 Categorization and causes of abnormal egg-shells — relationship with stress. British Poultry Science 27: 325CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lord, A 2001 Faecal glucocorticoid as a welfare indicator in chickens. PhD Thesis, University of Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Luger, A, Deuster, PA, Kyle, SB, Gallucci, WT, Montomery, LC, Gold, PW, Loriaux, DL and Chrousos, GP 1987 Acute hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal responses to the stress of treadmill exercises. The New England Journal of Medicine 316: 1309–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, GJ and Mendl, M 1993 Why is there no simple way of measuring welfare? Animal Welfare 2: 301–319Google Scholar
Mason, JW 1971 A re-evaluation of the concept of ‘non-specificity’ in stress theory. Journal of Psychiatric Research 8: 323–333CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mills, AD, Marche, M and Faure, JM 1987 Extraneous egg-shell calcification as a measure of stress in poultry. British Poultry Science 28: 177–181CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mills, AD, Nys, Y, Gautron, J and Zawadski, J 1991 Whitening of brown shelled eggs: individual variation and relationship with age. British Poultry Science 32: 117–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, RJ 2000 An Introduction to Behavioural Endocrinology. Sinauer Associates Inc: Sunderland, Massachusetts, USAGoogle Scholar
Orth, DN, Kovacs, WJ and Debold, C 1992 The adrenal cortex. In: Wilson, JD and Foster, DW (eds) Williams Textbook of Endocrinology pp 489–619. WB Saunders Company: Philadelphia, USAGoogle Scholar
Rushen, J 1986 Some problems with the physiological concept of “stress”. Australian Veterinary Journal 63: 359–361CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rushen, J 1991 Problems associated with the interpretation of physiological data in the assessment of animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 28: 381–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahin, A and Forbes, JM 1998 Fat selection in broiler chickens treated with corticosterone. British Poultry Science 39: S38–S39CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solomon, SE, Hughes, BO and Gilbert, AB 1987 Effect of a single injection of adrenalin on shell ultrastructure in a series of eggs from domestic hens. British Poultry Science 28: 585–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasser, SK, Hunt, KE, Brown, JL, Cooper, K, Crockett, CM, Bechert, U, Millspaugh, JJ, Larson, S and Monfort, SL 2000 A generalized fecal glucocorticoid assay for use in a diverse array of nondomestic mammalian and avian species. General and Comparative Endocrinology 120: 260–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, JM 1989 The effect of stress on the reproductive tract of the domestic fowl. PhD Thesis, University of Glasgow, UKGoogle Scholar