Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T05:05:56.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A survey assessment of the incidence of fur-chewing in commercial chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) farms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

MF Ponzio ,
JM Busso ,
RD Ruiz  and
M Fiol de Cuneo
MF Ponzio*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Fisiología, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Santa Rosa 1085 (X5000ESU) Córdoba, Argentina
JM Busso
Affiliation:
Instituto de Fisiología, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Santa Rosa 1085 (X5000ESU) Córdoba, Argentina
RD Ruiz
Affiliation:
Instituto de Fisiología, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Santa Rosa 1085 (X5000ESU) Córdoba, Argentina
M Fiol de Cuneo
Affiliation:
Instituto de Fisiología, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Santa Rosa 1085 (X5000ESU) Córdoba, Argentina
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: mponzio@mater.fcm.unc.edu.ar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chinchilla lanigera intensive breeding programmes are affected by an abnormal repetitive behaviour called ‘fur-chewing’, yet the aetiology is still unknown and little scientific work has been published on this condition. Recent studies have supported the idea that fur-chewing is a stress-related behaviour. In the present study, we used a questionnaire survey in order to: 1) describe general aspects on the epidemiology of fur-chewing in Argentinian farms, and 2) identify which management and/or environmental factors within the breeding facilities may be influencing the occurrence of fur-chewing. The survey consisted of 28 questions focused on farm characteristics, environmental variables and husbandry routines, and was distributed to Argentinian chinchilla farmers. All quantitative variables were tested in a multiple logistic regression model. The mean incidence of fur-chewing was 4.32 ± 0.37% (n = 107 farms). Variables negatively related to fur-chewing were the breeder experience in the activity, the total volume of the facility, and the number of wood shaving changes per week. Positive relationships were found for space index, number of rooms in the facility and presence of different rooms for fur production and reproduction. Other tendencies suggested that farms with the presence of external sound disturbance nearby had higher incidence levels. Also, we detected a tendency towards lower numbers of affected animals with an increment in the provision of dusting baths per week. Finally, results suggested a female prevalence in the development of the behaviour.

Keywords

animal welfarebehaviourchinchillafur-chewingquestionnaire surveystress
Type
Articles
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , November 2007 , pp. 471 - 479
Copyright
© 2007 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armario, A, Ortiz, R and Balasch, J 1984 Effects of crowding on some physiological and behavioral variables in adult male rats. Physiology and Behaviour 32: 35–37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barber, N and Thompson, RL 1990 Sandbathing reduces fur lipids of chinchillas, Chinchilla laniger. Animal Behaviour 39: 403–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barletta, F, Campos, M, Urquiza, JM and Rearte, D 2004 Panorama general del sector comercial de pieles de chinchilla. Informe Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Pesca y Alimentos: Gobierno de la Nación Argentina. www.sagpya.mecon.gov.ar. [Title translation: General view on the commerce of Chinchilla furs]Google Scholar
Bashaw, MJ, Tarou, LR, Maki, TS and Maple, TL 2001 A survey assessment of variables related to stereotypy in captive giraffe and okapi. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 73: 235–247CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borchelt, PL, Griswold, JG and Branchek, RS 1976 An analysis of sandbathing and grooming in the kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriami). Animal Behaviour 24: 347–353Google ScholarPubMed
Bordnick, PS, Thayer, BA and Ritchie, W 1994 Feather picking disorder and trichotillomania: an avian model of human psychopatology. Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 25: 189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronson, FH 1963 Density, subordination and social timidity in Peromyscus and C57BL/10J mice. Animal Behaviour 11: 475–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, RG 1980 Population size, social behaviour, and dispersal in house mice: a quantitative investigation. Animal Behaviour 28: 78–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christenson, GA 1995 Trichotillomania-from prevalence to comorbidity. Psychiatric Times 12: 44–48Google Scholar
De Jonge, G 1988 Genetics and evolution oftailbiting in mink. In: Murphy, BD and Hunter, D (eds) Proceedings of the IV International Scientific Congress in Fur Animal Production pp 503–505. 21 -24 August 1988. International Fur Animal Scientific Association: Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Ebensperger, LA 2000 Dustbathing and intra-sexual communication of social degus, Octodon degus (Rodentia: Octodontidae). Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 73: 359–365Google Scholar
EC 2001 The welfare of animals kept for fur production. Report of the scientific committee on animal health and animal welfare. Commission of the European Communities: Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, JF 1963 A comparative study of sandbathing behavior in heteromyid rodents. Behaviour 22: 16–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamallo, A, Villanua, A, Trancho, G and Fraile, A 1986 Stress adaptation and adrenal activity in isolated and crowded rats. Physiology and Behaviour 36: 217–221CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garner, JP, Dufour, B, Gregg, LE, Weisker, SM and Mench, JA 2004a Social and husbandry factors affecting the prevalence and severity of barbering (“wisker trimming”) by laboratory mice. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 89: 263–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, JP, Weisker, SM, Dufour, B and Mench, JA 2004b Barbering (fur and whisker trimming) by laboratory mice as a model of human trichotillomania and obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders. Comparative Medicine 54: 216–224Google Scholar
Grau, J 1986 La chinchilla, su crianza en todos los climas, 3rd edition. El Ateneo: Buenos Aires, Argentina. [Title translation: Chinchilla breeding in all climates]Google Scholar
Greenberg, G 1972 The effects of ambient temperature and population density on aggression in two inbred strain of mice, Mus musculus. Behaviour 42: I 19–130Google ScholarPubMed
Gregor, GL, Smith, RF, Simons, LS and Parker, HB 1970 Behavioral consequences of crowding in the deermouse (Peromyscus maniculatus). Journal of Comparative Physiology and Psychology 79: 488–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grindlinger, HM and Ramsay, E 1991 Compulsive feather picking in birds. Archives of General Psychiatry 48: 857Google ScholarPubMed
Griswold, JG, Borchelt, PL, Branchek, RS and Bensko, JA 1977 Condition of the pelage regulates sandbathing and grooming behaviour in the kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriami). Animal Behaviour 25: 602–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, SW, Houbak, B and Malmkvist, J 1998 Development and possible causes of fur chewing in farm mink — significance of social environment. Acta Agriculture Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science 44: 120–127Google Scholar
Honess, PE, Gimpel, JL, Wolfensohn, SE and Mason, GJ 2005 Alopecia scoring: the quantitative assessment of hair loss in captive macaques. ATLA 33: 193–206Google ScholarPubMed
Hull, EM, Kastaniotis, C, L'Hommedieu, G and Franz, JR 1976 Environmental enrichment and crowding: behavioral and hormonal effects. Physiology and Behaviour 17: 735–741CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, JR 1992 Husbandry and common diseases of the chinchilla (C. laniger). Journal of Small Exotic Animal Medicine 2: 15–17Google Scholar
Jiménez, JE 1995 Conservation of the last wild chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) archipiélago: a metapopulation approach. Vida Silvestre Neotropical 4: 89–97Google Scholar
Kersten, AMP 1997 Behaviour and welfare of chinchillas in commercial farming: A preliminary study. In: Hemsworth PH, Spinka M and Kostal L (eds) Proceedings of the 31st International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology pp 171. The International Society for Applied Ethology: Prague, Czech RepublicGoogle Scholar
Keuthen, NJ, O'Sullivan, RL, Hayday, CF, Peets, KE, Jenike, MA and Baer, L 1997 The relationship of menstrual cycle and pregnancy to compulsive hairpulling. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 66: 33–37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobelt, AJ, Hemsworth, PH, Barnett, JL and Colemanc, GJ 2003 A survey of dog ownership in suburban Australia — conditions and behaviour problems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 82: 137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraft, H 1994 Hauterkrankungen. In: Krankheten der Chinchillas. 5 Auflage pp 41 -43. Ferdinand Enke Verlag: Stuttgart, Germany. [Title translation: Diseases of the chinchillas]Google Scholar
Luescher, UA, McKeown, DB and Halip, J 1991 Stereotypic and obsessive-compulsive disorders in dogs and cats. Veterinary Clinical North American Small Animal Practice 21: 401 -413Google ScholarPubMed
Malmkvist, J and Hansen, SW 2001 The welfare of farmed mink (Mustela vison) in relation to behavioural selection: a review. Animal Welfare 10:41-52Google Scholar
Mason, GJ 1993 Forms of stereotypic behaviour. In: Lawrence, AB and Rushen, J (eds) Stereotypic Animal Behaviour: Fundamentals and Applications to Welfare pp 7–40. CABI: Oxon, UKGoogle Scholar
Mason, GJ 1994 Tail-biting in mink (Mustela vison) is influenced by age at removal from the mother. Animal Welfare 3: 285–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, GJ, Clubb, R, Latham, N and Vickery, S 2007 Why and how should we use environmental enrichment to tackle stereotypic behaviour? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 102: 163–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, PK and Ayling, SJ 1990 Varied cages result in more aggression in male CFLP mice. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 26: 277–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehan, CL, Millam, JR and Mench, JA 2003 Foraging opportunity and increased physical complexity both prevent and reduce psychogenic feather picking by young Amazon parrots. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 80: 71 -85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellen, JD 1994 Survey and interzoo studies used to address husbandry problems in some zoo vertebrates. Zoo Biology 13: 459–470Google Scholar
Merry, CJ 1990 An introduction to chinchillas. Veterinary Techniques 11: 315–322Google Scholar
Mon-Fanelli, AA, Dodman, NH and O'Sullivan, RL 1999 Veterinary models of compulsive self-grooming: parallels with trichotillomania. In: Stein DJ, Christenson GA and Hollander E (eds) Trichotillomania pp 6392. American Psychiatric Press: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Mösslacher, E 1986 Fur biting. In: Mösslacher E (ed) Breeding and caring for chinchillas pp 82-91 .TFH Publishing: Neptune City, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, U 1996 Genotype-environment interactions in relation to selection for and against pelt chip in mink. Animal Production Review, Applied Science report 27: 167–173Google Scholar
Poole, TB and Morgan, HDR 1973 Differences in aggressive behaviour between male mice (Mus musculus L.) in colonies of different sizes. Animal Behaviour 21: 788–795CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rancher's Handbook 1987 Empress Chinchilla Breeders Cooperative Inc, 10th edition. EEUU: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Randall, JA 1981 Comparison of sandbathing and grooming in two species of kangaroo rat. Animal Behaviour 29: 1213–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, RG 1962 Fur-chewing. National Chinchilla Breeders 18: 20–22Google Scholar
Syme, LA 1973 Social isolation at weaning: some effects on two measures of activity. Animal Learning and Behaviour 1: 161–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarou, LR, Bloomsmith, MA and Maple, TL 2005 Survey of stereotypic behaviours in prosimians. American Journal of Primatology 65: 81–196CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tisljar, M, Janic, D, Grabarevic, Z, Marinculic, A, Pinter, L, Janicki, Z and Nemanic, A 2002 Stress-induced Cushing's syndrome in fur-chewing chinchillas. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica 50: 133–142CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Hierden, Y 2003 Behavioural neurobiology of feather picking. PhD Thesis. University of Groningen, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
VanjonackWJ, and Johnson, HD 1973 Relationship of thyroid and adrenal function to fur-chewing in the chinchilla. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 45: I 15–120Google Scholar
Vestal, BM and Schnell, GD 1986 Influence of environmental complexity and space on social interactions of mice (Mus musculus and Peromyscus leucopus). Journal of Comparative Psychology 100: 143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vestergaard, KS, Skadhauge, E and Lawson, LG 1997 The stress of not being able to perform dustbathing in laying hens. Physiology and Behaviour 62: 413–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westman, JC and Walters, JR 1981 Noise and stress: a comprehensive approach. Environmental Health Perspectives 41: 291 -309 Wielebnowski NC Fletchall N Carlstead K Busso JM andCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, JL 2002 Noninvasive assessment of adrenal activity associated with husbandry and behavioural factors in the North American Clouded leopard population. Zoo Biology 21: 77–98Google Scholar
Wilcox, HH 1950 Histology of the skin and hair of the adult chinchilla. The Anatomical Record 108: 385–397CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed