Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T04:59:44.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stunning and killing of edible crabs (Cancer pagurus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

B Roth*
Affiliation:
Nofima-Norconserv A/S, Box 327, N-4002 Stavanger, Norway Department of Biology, University of Bergen, Box 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
S Øines
Affiliation:
Nofima-Norconserv A/S, Box 327, N-4002 Stavanger, Norway
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: bjorn.roth@nofima.no

Abstract

The stunning and killing efficiency of ice, superchilling (N2 gas), freezing (-37°C), gradual heating (40°C), boiling, piercing of ganglia, salt baths (NaCl and KCl), gas (CO2) and electricity (50 Hz AC) on edible crabs was studied. Results showed that electricity was the most efficient stunning method, whereby edible crabs could be rendered insensible within 1 s using electric field strengths of 400 V m−1 and above. Prolonging the electrical current to 10 s resulted in less potential difference (220 V m−1) required to stun the crabs. Applying a two-stage stun with 530 Vm−1 for 1 s followed by 170 V m−1 for 2 min resulted in a state of prolonged unconsciousness and 60% mortality. Failure to stun the crabs with electricity resulted in massive autotomy, where all appendages were lost. Behavioural responses were lost in approximately 30% of crabs after 100 min of chilling on ice, while freezing did not render the crabs unconscious until temperatures of subzero were reached. The exposed chelipeds stiffened, and once frozen, irreversible damage was caused. Placing crabs into heated seawater (40°C) led all responses to be lost after 5 min, while the internal temperature exceeded an average of 26°C, representing approximately 2.5 min of boiling. Gas, in the form of CO2, NaCl, and a low concentration of KCl (5%), failed to render the animals insensible within 12 min. Using 20% KCl saw all animals lose all behavioural responses within 3 min. The piercing of single ganglions failed to kill the animal; both ganglia must be pierced in order to kill the animal. We conclude that electrical stunning is recommended prior to boiling or carving, while piercing can alternatively be carried out by trained personnel.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2010 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaser, CS 1949 Avliving av hummer. Nordisk Veterinær Medisin 1: 221226. [Title translation: Killing of lobster]Google Scholar
Anonymous 1978 Humane Killing of Crabs and Lobsters. The Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Wheathampstead, Herts, UKGoogle Scholar
Anonymous 1999 Humane lobster stunner prototype. Fish Farming International 26: 42Google Scholar
Baker, JR 1955 Experiments on the humane killing of crabs. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 34: 1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, JR 1962 Humane killing of crustaceans. Science 135: 587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battison, A, MacMillan, R, MacKenzie, A, Rose, P, Cawthorn, R and Horney, B 2000 Use of injectable potassium chloride for euthanasia of American lobsters (Homarus americanus). Comparative Medicine 50: 545550Google Scholar
Bellchambers, LM, Smith, KD and Evans, SN 2005 Effect of exposure to ice slurries on nonovigerous and ovigerous blue swimmer crabs, Portunus pelagicus. Journal of Crustacean Biology 25: 274278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benarde, MA 1962 Humane killing of crustaceans. Science 135: 587CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, E 1979 The Edible Crab and its Fishery in British Waters pp 4247. Buckland Foundation Books: Bath, UKGoogle Scholar
EFSA (European Food and Safety Authority) 2004 Welfare Aspects of Animal Stunning and Killing Methods. AHAW/04-027. Available at http://www.efsa.eu.intGoogle Scholar
Elwood, RW and Appel, M 2009 Pain experience in hermit crabs? Animal Behaviour 77: 12431246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elwood, RW, Barr, S and Patterson, L 2009 Pain and stress in crustaceans? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 118: 128136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, C 1997 Options for humanely immobilising and killing crabs. Journal of Shellfish Research 16: 219224Google Scholar
Gunter, G 1961 Painless killing of crabs and other large crustaceans. Science 133: 327CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunter, G 1962 Humane killing of crustaceans. Science 135: 588593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kestin, SC, van de Vis, JW and Robb, DHF 2002 Protocol for assessing brain function in fish and the effectiveness of methods used to stun and kill them. The Veterinary Record 150: 302307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laverack, MS 1988 The numbers of neurons in decapod crustacea. Journal of Crustacean Biology 8: 111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordgreen, AH, Slinde, E, Moller, D and Roth, B 2008 Effect of various electric field strengths and current durations on stunning and spinal injuries of Atlantic herring. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 20: 110115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robb, D 1999 The Humane Slaughter of Crustacea: Electrical Stunning. Department of Food Animal Science, University of Bristol: Langford, UKGoogle Scholar
Robb, DHF and Roth, B 2003 Brain activity of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) following electrical stunning using various field strengths and pulse durations. Aquaculture 216: 363369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, B, Imsland, A and Foss, A 2009 Live chilling of turbot and subsequent effect on behaviour, muscle stiffness, muscle quality, blood gases and chemistry. Animal Welfare 18: 3341Google Scholar
Roth, B, Moeller, D and Slinde, E 2004 Ability of electric field strength, frequency, and current duration to stun farmed Atlantic salmon and pollock and relations to observed injuries using sinusoidal and square wave alternating current. North American Journal of Aquaculture 66: 208216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandow, A and Kahn, AJ 1952 The immediate effects of potassium on responses of skeletal muscle. Journal of Cellular and Comparative Physiology 40: 89114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed