Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:49:02.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Behaviour and Injuries of Horned Cows in Loose Housing Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

C Menke ,
S Waiblinger ,
D W Fölsch  and
P R Wiepkema
C Menke*
Affiliation:
Department of Farm Animal Behaviour and Management, University of Kassel, D-37217 Witzenhausen, Germany
S Waiblinger
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Husbandry and Animal Welfare, Veterinarian University Vienna, A-1040 Vienna, Austria
D W Fölsch
Affiliation:
Department of Farm Animal Behaviour and Management, University of Kassel, D-37217 Witzenhausen, Germany
P R Wiepkema
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Agricultural University, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relationship between social behaviour and skin injuries (caused by horns) of loose housed horned cows was investigated on 35 dairy farms. While the frequencies of two agonistic behaviour elements (push and chase away) were positively correlated with the occurrence of skin injuries, the frequencies of butting and horning were not. Butting appears to have an ambivalent motivation, in that its occurrence is correlated positively both with agonistic behaviour and with social licking. Horning showed a positive correlation with social licking only. Four groups of husbandry conditions that may be associated with the occurrence of social behaviour and of injuries were distinguished: i) herd management, with variables including problem solving management by the farmer, integration of new cows, and dealing with periparturient and oestrus cows; ii) human-animal relationship, with variables including ability to identify individual cows, frequency of brushing the cows, number of milkers, and frequency of personnel changes; iii) animal characteristics, with the variable of herd size; and iv) stable characteristics, with the variable of space per cow (m2). The relevance of the husbandry variables investigated here had been confirmed in a previous stepwise regression analysis (Menke 1996). The variables for herd management and human-animal relationship conditions correlated in a consistent way with the occurrence of agonistic behaviour and/or of injuries, while most of them also correlated in the opposite direction with the occurrence of social licking. Herd size correlated positively with agonistic behaviour, but negatively with social licking. Space per cow correlated negatively with agonistic behaviour and injuries. In more than 70 per cent of the herds investigated, the levels of agonistic behaviour and of skin injuries were low, implying that horned dairy cows can be kept with less risk than is often assumed. We argue that such risks strongly depend on management factors that can be improved.

Keywords

animal welfarehorned dairy cowshuman-animal relationshipinjuriesloose housingmanagementsocial behaviour
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , August 1999 , pp. 243 - 258
Copyright
© 1999 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andreae, U, Beneke, B and Smidt, D 1985 Ethologische Erhebungen über den Raumbedarf und Raumnutzung bei Jungrindern und Milchkühen. Landbauforschung Völkenrode Sonderheft 75: 58–84Google Scholar
Arave, C W, Hurnik, J F and Friend, TH 1984 Some observations on the role of behaviour in cattle production and future research needs. Applied Animal Ethology 11: 413–421Google Scholar
Boissy, A and Bouissou, M F 1988 Effects of early handling on heifers on subsequent reactivity to humans and to unfamiliar situations. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 22: 259–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boivin, X, Le Neindre, P, Garel, J P and Chupin, J M 1994 Influence of breed and rearing management on cattle reactions during human handling. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39: 115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouissou, M F 1972 Influence of body weight and presence of horns on social rank in domestic cattle. Animal Behaviour 20: 474–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chupin, J M and Le Neindre, P 1990 Programme de formation sur la manipulation des bovins en France. 41st Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production: 458-459Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T H, Greenwood, P J and Powell, R P 1976 Ranks and relationships in highland ponies and highland cows. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 41: 212–216Google ScholarPubMed
Collis, K A, Kay, S J, Grant, A J and Quick, A J 1979 The effect on social organisation and milk production of minor group alterations in dairy cattle. Applied Animal Ethology 5: 103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collis, K A, Vagg, M, Gleed, P, Copp, C. and Samson, B 1980 The effects of reducing manger space on dairy cow behaviour and production. Veterinary Record 107: 197–198CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Czako, J 1978 The effect of space on the behaviour and production of dairy cows in large-scale systems. 1st World Congress on Ethology Applied to Zootechnics: 275-283.Google Scholar
Ernst, A J 1977 Dehorning beef cattle. Queensland Agriculture Journal 103: 439–442Google Scholar
Espmark, Y 1964 Studies of dominance subordination relationships in a group of semi domestic reindeer. Animal Behaviour 12: 420–426Google Scholar
Fordyce, G, Goddard, M, Tyler, R, Williams, G and Toleman, M 1985 Temperament and bruising of Bos indicus cross cattle. Australian Journal Experimental Agriculture 25: 283–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, A F and Broom, D M 1990 Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare. Balliere Tindall: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Frey, R and Berchtold, M 1983 Analyse vorzeitiger Ausmerzungen. Zuchthygiene 18: 203–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fries, B 1978 Ursachen und Auswirkungen des Sozialgeschehens in einer hornlosen Rinderherde. Published PhD dissertation, University of Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Geist, V 1966 Evolution of horn-like organs. Behaviour 27: 178–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graf, B 1974 Aktivitäten von entkörnten und nicht enthornten Milchkühen auf der Weide. Diplomarbeit (unpublished Masters thesis work), Institut für Tierproduktion, Eidgenössisch Technische Hochschule Zürich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
Graf, B, Trachsler, U, Steiger, M and Graf, M 1996 Reduktion der Belastung von Kälbern bei der Enthornung. Agrarforschung 3: 321–324Google Scholar
Hargreaves, A L and Hutson, G D 1990 Some effects of repeated handling on stress responses in sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 26: 253–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermentin, G 1990 Kleine Rinderlaufställe - Schwerpunkt Milchvieh. Tagungsbericht Bundesanstalt für alpenländische Landwirtschaft Gumpenstein: 17-21Google Scholar
Jonasen, B 1991 Social Behaviour of Dairy Cows in a Stimulus-rich Environment. Internal Report, National Institute of Animal Science, Department of Research in Cattle and Sheep: Foulum, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
Kimstedt, W M 1974 Untersuchungen über die Rangordnung beim Hausrind in Abhängigkeit von der Enthornung. Published PhD dissertation, University of Gießen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Kretzmann, P M, Wallace, H G and Weaver, D B 1985 The role of hornless cattle in beef carcass bruising at Cato Rico abattoir. Journal of South African Veterinary Association 56: 199–200Google Scholar
Lippitz, O, Kaiser, R and Klug, F 1973 Untersuchungen zum Verhalten von Milchkühen im Boxenlaufstall bei unterschiedlichem Tier/Freßplatz-Verhältnis und ständig freiem Zugang zur Krippe. Tierzucht 27: 522–525Google Scholar
Martin, P and Bateson, PPG 1993 Measuring Behaviour. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meischke, H R C, Ramsay, W R and Shaw, F D 1974 The effect of horns on bruising in cattle. Australian Veterinary Journal 50: 432–434Google ScholarPubMed
Menke, C 1986 Auswirkungen von Streß auf das Verhallen einer schwarzbunten Milchviehherde unter Zuhilfenahme der elektronischen Datenverarbeitung. Diplomarbeit (unpublished Masters thesis work), Gesamthochschule Kassel, Witzenhausen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Menke, C 1996 Laufstallhaltung mit behornten Milchkühen. Published PhD dissertation (No 11379), Institut für Nutztierwissenschaften, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
Metz, J H M and Wierenga, H K 1984 Spatial requirements and lying behaviour of cows in loose housing systems. In: Unshelm J, van Putten G and Zeeb K (eds) Proceedings of the International Congress on Applied Ethology in Farm Animals pp 179-183. European Association for Animal Production/Society of Veterinary Ethology/German Veterinary SocietyGoogle Scholar
Oester, H 1977 Auswirkungen der Enthornung bei Schweizer Braunvieh Milchkühen im Tiefstreulaufstall auf allgemeine und spezielle Aktivitäten. Diplomarbeit (unpublished Masters thesis work), Zoologisches Institut, University of Bern, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, V 1973 Beiträge zur sozialen Rangordnung und Melkordnung bei Kühen. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 32: 281–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, V 1979 Handhabung von Massai-Rindern unter extensiven Haltungsbedingungen. KTBL-Schrift 254: 97–102Google Scholar
Reinhardt, V, Mutiso, F M and Reinhardt, A 1978 Social behaviour and social relationships between female and male prepubertal bovine calves. Applied Animal Ethology 4: 43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieck, G W 1961 Die psychischen Grundlagen der Milchhergabe beim Rind. Tierzüchter 13: 201–202Google Scholar
Sato, Y and Maeda, A 1991 Social licking patterns in cattle: influence of environmental and social factors. Applied Animal Behaviour Sciences 32:3-12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, Y, Tarumizu, K and Hatae, K 1993 The influence of social factors on allogrooming in cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Sciences 38: 235–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, Y, Tarumizu, K and Sonoda, T 1991 Social, behavioural and physiological functions of allo-grooming in cattle. In: Appleby M C, Horrell R I, Petherick J C and Rutter S M (eds) Applied Animal Behaviour: Past. Present and Future pp 77-78 . UFAW: Potters Bar, UKGoogle Scholar
Schlichting, M C 1974 Untersuchungen über die Fähigkeiten des Betreuungspersonals in der Milchviehhaltung und dessen Einfluß auf die Milchleistung. KTBL-Schrift 191.1-65Google Scholar
Schloeth, R 1961 Das Sozialleben des Camargue-Rindes. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 18: 574–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seabrook, M F 1984 The psychological interaction between the stockman and his animals and its influence on performance of pigs and dairy cows. Veterinary Record 115: 84–87Google ScholarPubMed
Seabrook, M F 1986 The relationship between man and animals in managed systems. In: Cole, D J A and Brander, G C (eds) Bioindustrial Ecosystems pp 211–222. Elsevier Science Publishers: Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Shaw, F D, Baxter, R I and Ramsay, W R 1976 The contribution of horned cattle to carcass bruising. Veterinary Record 98: 255–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taschke, A 1995 Ethologische, physiologische und histologische Untersuchungen zur Schmerzbelastung der Rinder bei der Enthornung. Published PhD dissertation, University of Zürich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
Taschke, A and Fölsch, D W 1995 Kritische Bewertung der thermischen Enthornung von Kälbern. Untersuchung des Verhaltens, des Cortisols im Speichel und der Innervation der Hornanlage. KTBL-Schrift 370: 52–62Google Scholar
Waiblinger, S, Menke, C and Fölsch, D W 1995 Laufstallhaltung behornter Milchkühe - Der Einfluß der Mensch-Tier-Beziehung. In: Deutsche Veterinärmedizinischen Gesellschaft (DVG) (eds) Bericht des 21. Kongress der DVG eV pp 206–211. Deutsche Veterinärmedizinischen Gesellschaft: Bad Nauheim, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Walther, F 1966 Mit Horn und Huf. Paul Parey Verlag: Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Wiepkema, P R and Koolhaas, J M 1993 Stress and animal welfare. Animal Welfare 2: 195–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodbury, A M 1941 Changing the ‘hook-order’ in cows. Ecology 22: 410–411Google Scholar
Zeeb, K 1987 Wieviel Lauffläche brauchen Milchkühe? Tierzüchter 39: 169–170Google Scholar
Zeeb, K and Zimmermann-Müller, M 1971 Sozialstruktur und Aktivität bei Milchkühen. Tierzüchter 9: 251–253Google Scholar