Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T00:27:14.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A review of current indicators of welfare in captive elephants (Loxodonta africana and Elephas maximus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

E Williams*
Affiliation:
School of Animal Rural and Environmental Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Brackenhurst Campus, Southwell, Nottinghamshire NG25 0QF, UK
CL Chadwick
Affiliation:
Ecosystems and Environment Research Centre, School of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford, The Crescent, Greater Manchester M5 4WT, UK
L Yon
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE12 5RD, UK
L Asher
Affiliation:
Centre for Behaviour and Evolution, Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle NE2 4HH, UK
*
Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: ellen.williams@ntu.ac.uk

Abstract

Concerns over elephant welfare in UK zoos have implications for their future in captivity. To monitor improvements made to elephant welfare in UK zoos, non-invasive, valid and reliable indicators of welfare are needed. Using a rapid review strategy and critical appraisal tool, we aimed to appraise evidence from peer-reviewed literature on potential welfare indicators for captive elephants. Scopus, Web of Knowledge and Ovid were searched in January 2014 using terms relevant to captive elephants and welfare assessment. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied and remaining articles were critically appraised against a specially designed welfare indicator appraisal tool. Thirty-seven unique indicators of welfare were extracted from 30 peer-reviewed papers which met the inclusion criteria. Behavioural measures of welfare (n = 21) were more common than either physical (n = 11) or physiological (n = 5) measures. Stereotypies were the most frequently used behavioural measure, glucocorticoids were the most frequently used physiological measure and body condition scores were the most frequently used physical measure. There was most support for the following indicators of improved welfare state: reduced stereotypies, reduced glucocorticoids and improved body condition scores. Additional measures which require further validation but had strong associations with the most supported measures, and thus have potential use in welfare assessment, were: increased lying rest and positive social interactions. Further validation of the described measures is needed, but this information forms a crucial part of the knowledge required to efficiently monitor and improve the welfare of elephants in captivity.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2018 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asher, L and Collins, L 2012 Assessing synchrony in groups: Are you measuring what you think you are measuring? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 138(3-4): 162169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.02.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, L, Collins, LM, Ortiz-Pelaez, A, Drewe, JA, Nicol, CJ and Pfeiffer, DU 2009 Recent advances in the analysis of behav-ioural organization and interpretation as indicators of animal wel-fare. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 6(41): 11031119. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2009.0221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, L, Williams, E and Yon, L 2015 Developing behavioural indicators, as part of a wider set of indicators, to assess the welfare of elephants in UK zoos. Defra WC1081. Defra: Bristol, UKGoogle Scholar
Baker, SE, Sharp, TM and Macdonald, DW 2016 Assessing animal welfare impacts in the management of European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus), European moles (Talpa europaea) and carrion crows (Corvus corone). PloS One 11(1): e0146298. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belshaw, Z, Asher, L, Harvey, ND and Dean, RS 2015 Quality of life assessment in domestic dogs: An evidence-based rapid review. The Veterinary Journal 206(2): 203212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.07.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, CL, Williams, E, Asher, L and Yon, L 2017 Stakeholders’ opinions on assessing the welfare of elephants (Loxodonta africana and Elephas maximus) housed in UK zoos. Animal Welfare 26: 461472. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.26.4.461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clubb, R and Mason, G 2002 A review of the welfare of zoo ele-phants in Europe. RSPCA: Horsham, UKGoogle Scholar
Clubb, R, Rowcliffe, M, Lee, P, Mar, KU, Moss, C and Mason, GJ 2008 Compromised survivorship in zoo elephants. Science 322(5908): 16491649. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164298Google ScholarPubMed
Clubb, R, Rowcliffe, M, Lee, P, Mar, KU, Moss, C and Mason, GJ 2009 Fecundity and population viability in female zoo elephants: problems and possible solutions. Animal Welfare 18: 237247Google Scholar
Dathe, HH, Kuckelkorn, B and Minnemann, D 1992 Salivary cortisol assessment for stress detection in the Asian elephant (Elephas maximus): A pilot study. Zoo Biology 11(4): 285289. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.1430110408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, MS 2008 What is good welfare and how can we achieve it? In: Dawkins, MS and Bonney, R (eds) Future of Animal Farming: Renewing the Ancient Contract. Blackwell Publishing: Malden, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
Elzanowski, A and Sergiel, A 2006 Stereotypic behavior of a female Asiatic elephant (Elephas maximus) in a zoo. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 9(3): 223232. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327604jaws0903_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanson, KV, Lynch, M, Vogelnest, L, Miller, G and Keeley, T 2013 Response to long-distance relocation in Asian elephants (Elephas maximus): monitoring adrenocortical activity via serum, urine, and feces. European Journal of Wildlife Research 59(5): 655664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-013-0718-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, TH 1999 Behavior of picketed circus elephants. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 62(1): 7388. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00210-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, TH and Parker, ML 1999 The effect of penning versus picketing on stereotypic behavior of circus elephants. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 64(3): 213225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00039-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godogama, WK, Wemmer, C and Ratnasooriya, WD 1998 The body condition of Sri Lankan domesticated elephants (Elephas maximus maximus). Ceylon Journal of Science (Biological Sciences) 26: 16Google Scholar
GRADE Working Group 2004 Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 328(7454): 1490–0. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490Google Scholar
Grand, AP, Kuhar, CW, Leighty, KA, Bettinger, TL and Laudenslager, ML 2012 Using personality ratings and cortisol to characterize individual differences in African Elephants (Loxodonta africana). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 142(1-2): 6975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.09.002Google Scholar
Greco, BJ, Meehan, CL, Hogan, JN, Leighty, KA, Mellen, J, Mason, GJ and Mench, JA 2016 The days and nights of zoo ele-phants: using epidemiology to better understand stereotypic behaviour of African elephants (Loxodonta africana) and Asian ele-phants (Elephas maximus) in North American Zoos. PLoS One 11(7): e0144276. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, TM, Friend, TH, Gardner, JM, Packard, JM, Beaver, B and Bushong, D 2000 Variation in stereotypic behavior relat-ed to restraint in circus elephants. Zoo Biology 19(3): 209221. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2361(2000)19:3<209::AID-ZOO4>3.0.CO;2-73.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurusamy, V, Tribe, A and Phillips, CJC 2014 Identification of major welfare issues for captive elephant husbandry by stakeholders. Animal Welfare 23: 1124. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.23.1.011Google Scholar
Harker, JH and Kleijnen, J 2012 What is a rapid review? A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in health technology assessments. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare 10(4): 397410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1609.2012.00290.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, M, Sherwin, C and Harris, S 2008 The welfare, housing and husbandry of elephants in UK zoos. Defra WC05007. Defra: Bristol, UKGoogle Scholar
Haspeslagh, M, Stevens, J, De Groot, E, Dewulf, J, Kalmar, I and Moons, C 2013 A survey of foot problems, stereotypic behaviour and floor type in Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in European zoos. Animal Welfare 22(4): 437443. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.22.4.437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, SP and Broom, DM 2009 Measuring zoo animal welfare: theory and practice. Zoo Biology 28(6): 531544. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20276Google ScholarPubMed
Hnath, PT and Yannessa, MN 2002 Effects of facility modi-fications on elephant activity levels. Animal Keepers Forum 29(10): 421427Google Scholar
Holdgate, MR, Meehan, CL, Hogan, JN, Miller, LJ, Rushen, J, de Passillé, AM, Soltis, J, Andrews, J and Shepherdson, DJ 2016b Recumbence behaviour in zoo elephants: determination of patters and fre-quency of recumbent rest and associated environmental and social factors. PLoS One 11(7): e0153301. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdgate, MR, Meehan, CL, Hogan, JN, Miller, LJ, Soltis, J, Andrews, J and Shepherdson, DJ 2016a Walking behaviour of zoo elephants: associations between GPS measured daily walking distances and environmental factors, social factors and welfare indicators. PLoS One 11(7): e0150331. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosey, GR, Melfi, V and Pankhurst, S 2009 Zoo Animals: Behaviour, Management and Welfare. Oxford University Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Jones, MA, Mason, GJ and Pillay, N 2011 Correlates of birth origin effects on the development of stereotypic behaviour in striped mice, Rhabdomys. Animal Behaviour 82(1): 149159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.04.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaptchuk, TJ 2001 The double-blind, randomized, placebo-con-trolled trial: Gold standard or golden calf? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 54(6): 541549. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00347-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiiru, W 2007 The sad state of captive elephants in Canada. Zoo check Canada, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Koyama, N, Ueno, Y, Eguchi, Y, Uetake, K and Tanaka, T 2012 Effects of daily management changes on behavioral patterns of a solitary female African elephant (Loxodonta africana) in a zoo. Animal Science Journal 83(7): 562570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2011.00992.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laws, N, Ganswindt, A, Heistermann, M, Harris, M, Harris, S and Sherwin, C 2007 A case study: fecal corticosteroid and behavior as indicators of welfare during relocation of an Asian ele-phant. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 10(4): 349358. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888700701555600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighty, KA, Soltis, J, Wesolek, CM, Savage, A, Mellen, J and Lehnhardt, J 2009 GPS determination of walking rates in captive African elephants (Loxodonta africana). Zoo Biology 28(1): 1628. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, KD, Shepherdson, DJ, Owens, TM and Keele, M 2010 A survey of elephant husbandry and foot health in North American Zoos. Zoo Biology 29(2): 221236Google ScholarPubMed
Mason, GJ 1991 Stereotypies: a critical review. Animal Behaviour 41(6): 10151037. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80640-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, GJ 2010 Species differences in responses to captivity: stress, welfare and the comparative method. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25(12): 713721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.08.011Google ScholarPubMed
Mason, GJ and Latham, NR 2004 Can't stop, won't stop: is stereotypy a reliable animal welfare indicator? Animal Welfare 13: S57S69Google Scholar
Mason, GJ and Veasey, JS 2010 How should the psychological well-being of zoo elephants be objectively investigated? Zoo Biology 29(2): 237255. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20256Google ScholarPubMed
McPhee, ME and Carlstead, K 2012 The importance of main-taining natural behaviors in captive mammals. In: Kleiman, DG, Thompson, KV and Kirk Baer, C (eds) Wild Mammals in Captivity: Principles and Techniques for Zoo Management, Second Edition. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
Meagher, RK 2009 Observer ratings: Validity and value as a tool for animal welfare research. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 119(1-2): 114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehan, CL, Mench, JA, Carlstead, K and Hogan, JN 2016 Determining connections between the daily lives of zoo elephants and their welfare: an epidemiological approach. PLoS One 11(7): e0158124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meller, CL, Croney, C and Shepherdson, D 2007 Effects of rubberized flooring on Asian elephant behavior in captivity. Zoo Biology 26(1): 5161. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20119CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menargues, A, Urios, V and Mauri, M 2008 Welfare assess-ment of captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) and Indian rhi-noceros (Rhinoceros unicornis) using salivary cortisol measurement. Animal Welfare 17: 305312Google Scholar
Miller, MA, Hogan, JN and Meehan, CL 2016 Housing and demographic risk factors impacting foot and musculoskeletal health in African elephants (Loxodonta africana) and Asian ele-phants (Elephas maximus) in North American zoos. PLoS One 11(7): e0155223. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155223Google Scholar
Millspaugh, JJ, Burke, T, Van Dyk, G, Slotow, R, Washburn, BE and Woods, RJ 2007 Stress response of working African ele-phants to transportation and safari adventures. Journal of Wildlife Management 71(4): 12571260. https://doi.org/10.2193/2006-015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millspaugh, JJ and Washburn, BE 2004 Use of fecal glucocor-ticoid metabolite measures in conservation biology research: con-siderations for application and interpretation. General and Comparative Endocrinology 138: 189199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2004.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morfeld, KA, Meehan, CL, Hogan, JN and Brown, JL 2016 Assessment of body condition in African (Loxodonta africana) and Asian (Elephas maximus) elephants in North American zoos and management practices associated with high body condition scores. PLoS One 11(7): e0155146. https://doi.org/10.1371/jour-nal.pone.0155146Google ScholarPubMed
Mormede, P, Andanson, S, Auperin, B, Beerda, B, Guemene, D, Malmkvist, J, Manteca, X, Manteuffel, G, Prunet, P, van Reenen, CG, Richard, S and Veissier, I 2007 Exploration of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function as a tool to evaluate animal welfare. Physiology and Behaviour 92(3): 317339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.12.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakagawa, S and Cuthill, IC 2007 Effect size, confidence inter-val and statistical significance: A practical guide for biologists. Biological Reviews 82(4): 591605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00027.xGoogle Scholar
Palme, R 2012 Monitoring stress hormone metabolites as a use-ful, non-invasive tool for welfare assessment in farm animals. Animal Welfare 21(3): 331337. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.21.3.331Google Scholar
Poole, J and Moss, C 2008 Elephant sociality and complexity. In: Wemmer, C and Christen, CA (eds) Elephants and Ethics: Toward a Morality of Coexistence. Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USAGoogle Scholar
Posta, B, Huber, R and Moore III, DE 2013 The effects of housing on zoo elephant behavior: A quantitative case study of diurnal and seasonal variation. International Journal of Comparative Psychology 26(1): 3752Google Scholar
Ralph, CR and Tilbrook, AJ 2016 Invited review: The usefulness of measuring glucocorticoids for assessing animal welfare. Journal of Animal Science 94(2): 457470. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9645CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramanthan, A and Mallapur, A 2008 A visual health assess-ment of captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) housed in India. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 39(2): 148154. https://doi.org/10.1638/2007-0008R1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, PA 2004 Low environmental temperature causes an increase in stereotypic behaviour in captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) Journal of Thermal Biology 29(1): 3743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2003.10.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, PA 2009 Activity budgets and the relationship between feeding and stereotypic behaviors in Asian elephants (Elephas max-imus) in a Zoo. Zoo Biology 28(2): 7997. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, J 1995 Keeping circus elephants temporarily in pad-docks: the effects on their behaviour. Animal Welfare 4: 87101Google Scholar
Schmid, J, Heistermann, M, Ganslober, U and Hodges, JK 2001 Introduction of foreign female Asian elephants (Elephas max-imus) into an existing group: behavioural reactions and changes in cortisol levels. Animal Welfare 10: 357372Google Scholar
Sharp, T and Saunders, G 2011 A Model for Assessing the Relative Humaneness of Pest Animal Control Methods, Second Edition. Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Canberra, ACT, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Sibbald, B and Roland, M 1998 Understanding controlled trials: Why are randomised controlled trials important? BMJ 316(7126): 201. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7126.201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soltis, J 2010 Vocal communication in African elephants (Loxodonta africana). Zoo Biology 29(2): 192209Google Scholar
Stoinski, TS, Daniel, E and Maple, TL 2000 A preliminary study of the behavioral effects of feeding enrichment on African elephants. Zoo Biology 19(6): 485493. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2361(2000)19:6<485::AID-ZOO1>3.0.CO;2-53.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanitha, V, Thiyagesan, K and Baskaran, N 2011 Social life of captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in Southern India: implications for elephant welfare. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 14(1): 4258. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2011.527603CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veasey, J 2006 Concepts in the care and welfare of captive ele-phants. International Zoo Yearbook 40(1): 6379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1090.2006.00063.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, O 2010 Management Guidelines for the Welfare of Zoo Animals: Elephants, Third Edition. BIAZA: UKGoogle Scholar
Wells, DL and Irwin, RM 2008 Auditory stimulation as enrich-ment for zoo-housed Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). Animal Welfare 17(4): 335340Google Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F and Mullan, S 2014 Applying ethological and health indicators to practical animal welfare assessment. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l’OIE 33(1): 111120. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.33.1.2259Google ScholarPubMed
Wemmer, C, Krishnamurthy, V, Shrestha, S, Hayek, LA, Thant, M and Nanjappa, KA 2006 Assessment of body condition in Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). Zoo Biology 25(3): 187200. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whilde, J and Marples, N 2011 Effect of a birth on the behavior of a family group of Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) at Dublin Zoo. Zoo Biology 31(4): 442452. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20408CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitham, JC and Wielebnowski, N 2009 Animal-based welfare monitoring: Using keeper ratings as an assessment tool. Zoo Biology 28(6): 545560. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20281Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, E, Bremner-Harrison, S, Harvey, N, Evison, E and Yon, L 2015 An investigation into resting behaviour in Asian ele-phants in UK zoos. Journal of Zoo Biology 34: 406417. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21235CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, M, Bloomsmith, M and Maple, T 2004 Stereotypic swaying and serum cortisol concentrations in three captive African elephants (Loxodonta africana). Animal Welfare 13: 3943Google Scholar
Zoos’ Forum Elephant Working Group 2010 Elephants in UK Zoos: Zoos’ Forum review of issues in elephant husbandry in UK zoos in light of the Report by Harris et al (2008). Wildlife Species Conservation Division, Defra, Bristol, UKGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Williams et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 276.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Williams et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 133.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Williams et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 166.6 KB
PDF 276.5 KB
PDF 133.9 KB
PDF 166.6 KB