Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T23:04:09.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Putative Welfare-Reducing Effects of Preventing Equine Stereotypic Behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

S D McBride  and
D Cuddeford
S D McBride*
Affiliation:
Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales, Aberystwyth SY23 3AL, UK
D Cuddeford
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Clinical Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Mid-Lothian EH25 9RG, UK
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The common practice of preventing equine stereotypic behaviour in the UK may be of concern, from a welfare perspective, if these behaviours constitute a coping response to a suboptimal environment. The aim of this study was to assess the putative function of these behaviours by measuring behavioural and physiological parameters i) before and after stereotypy prevention; ii) before and after stereotypy performance; and iii) in response to opiate antagonist (naloxone) administration.

The crib-strap significantly (P = 0.05) elevated mean plasma Cortisol levels in crib-biting horses; a similar, although not significant trend (P = 0.07) was also observed for the weaving group during the anti-weave bar treatment. Both crib-strap and anti-weave bar significantly (P < 0.05) elevated plasma Cortisol levels in the control horses. Although the latter result prevented a definite conclusion being drawn about the function of equine stereotypies, the results did indicate that the use of the crib-strap and anti-weave bar is stressful to the horse.

Plasma Cortisol level was significantly (P = 0.04) higher immediately prior to the onset of stereotypy followed by a significant reduction post-stereotypy. This suggested that both crib-biting and weaving have a coping function to reduce stress levels in the animal.

Naloxone significantly reduced crib-biting by 84 per cent (P = 0.05) but it did not reduce weaving behaviour, indicating that crib-biting is a reward behaviour. However, resting behaviour was also significantly (P = 0.02) increased in crib-biting horses, suggesting that the stereotypy reduction was due to a sedative effect of the opiate antagonist. The latter was not measured, however, in control or weaving animals, and thus may be interpreted differently. The welfare implications of these results are discussed.

Keywords

animal welfareequinestereotypic behaviour
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , May 2001 , pp. 173 - 189
Copyright
© 2001 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bahn, P G 1980 Crib-biting: Tethered horses in the Paleolithic? World Archaeology 12: 212–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakshi, V P and Kelley, A E 1994 Sensitization and conditioning of feeding following multiple morphine microinjections into the nucleus-accumbens. Brain Research 648: 342–346CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Band, L C and Hull, E M 1990 Morphine and dynorphin (1-13) microinjected into the medial preoptic area and nucleus accumbens - effects on sexual behavior in male rats. Brain Research 524: 77–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bateson, P 1991 Assessment of pain in animals. Animal Behaviour 42: 827–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J J and Nicol, C J 1991 Stereotypic behavior affects environmental preference in bank voles, Clethrionomys glareolus. Animal Behaviour 41: 971–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, T R, Trunkfield, H R, Zanella, A J and Booth, W D 1989 An enzyme-linked immunosorbent-assay for Cortisol in the saliva of man and domestic farm-animals. Journal of Endocrinology 123: R 13-R 16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crain, S M and Shen, K F 1992 After chronic opioid exposure sensory neurons become supersensitive to the excitatory effects of opioid agonists and antagonists as occurs after acute elevation of gml ganglioside. Brain Research 575: 13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, G M, Wiepkema, P R and Vanree, J M 1986 Endorphins implicated in stereotypies of tethered sows. Experientia 42: 198–199CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dantzer, R 1991 Stress, stereotypies and welfare. Behavioural Processes 25: 95–102CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dantzer, R, Gonyou, H W, Curtis, S E and Kelley, K W 1987 Changes in serum Cortisol reveal functional differences in frustration-induced chain chewing in pigs. Physiology and Behavior 39: 775–777CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodman, N H, Shuster, L, Court, M H and Dixon, R 1987 Investigation into the use of narcotic-antagonists in the treatment of a stereotypic behavior pattern (crib-biting) in the horse. American Journal of Veterinary Research 48: 311–319Google ScholarPubMed
Giraudo, S Q, Grace, M K, Welch, C C, Billington, C J and Levine, A S 1993 Naloxone's anorectic effect is dependent upon the relative palatability of food. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 46: 917–921CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennes, D and De Rycke, P H 1988 The influence of the performance of stereotypies on plasma corticosterone and eosinophil levels in bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus). Proceedings of the 29th International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology: 238-240 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Kennes, D, Odberg, F O, Bouquet, Y and De Rycke, P H 1988 Changes in naloxone and haloperidol effects during the development of captivity-induced jumping stereotypy in bank voles. European Journal of Pharmacology 153: 19–24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lebelt, D 1998 Physiological correlates associated with cribbing behaviour in horses: Changes in thermal threshold, heart rate, plasma beta-endorphin and serotonin. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 27: 21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, A C, Kelland, A and Nicol, C J 1999 Effects of observational learning on acquisition of an operant response in horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 61: 187–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majeed, N H, Przewlocka, B, Wedzony, K and Przewlocki, R 1986 Stimulation of food-intake following opioid microinjection into the nucleus accumbens septi in rats. Peptides 7: 711–716Google ScholarPubMed
Mama, K R, Pascoe, P J and Steffey, E P 1992 Evaluation of the interaction of mu and kappa-opioid agonists on locomotor behavior in the horse. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 57: 106–109Google Scholar
Mason, G J 1993 Forms of stereotypic behaviour. In Lawrence, A B and Rushen, J (eds) Stereotypic Animal Behaviour: Fundamentals and Applications to Welfare pp 7–40. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
McBride, S D 2000 An Investigation into the Stereotypic Behaviour of the Horse. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
McBride, S D and Long, L (in press) The perception and subsequent management of equine stereotypic behaviour by horse owners; implications for animal welfare. Veterinary RecordGoogle Scholar
McGreevy, P and Nicol, C 1998 Physiological and behavioral consequences associated with short-term prevention of crib-biting in horses. Physiology and Behavior 65: 15–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGreevy, P D, French, N P and Nicol, C J 1995 The prevalence of abnormal behaviors in dressage, eventing and endurance horses in relation to stabling. Veterinary Record 137: 36–37Google ScholarPubMed
Mucha, R F and Iversen, S D 1986 Increased food-intake after opioid microinjections into nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area of rat. Brain Research 397: 214–224CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nurnberg, H G, Keith, S J and Paxton, D M 1997 Consideration of the relevance of ethological animal models for human repetitive behavioral spectrum disorders. Biological Psychiatry 41: 226–229CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ralston J M, Stenhouse A M, Stenhouse N S, Buck G J, Lucks S F, Reynoldson J A and Bolton J R - 1988 Cortisol concentrations in blood and urine of horses. Australian Veterinary Journal 65: 1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redbo, I, Redbo-Torstensson, P, Odberg, F O, Hedendahl, A and Holm, J 1998 Factors affecting behavioural disturbances in race-horses. Animal Science 66: 475–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushen, J, Depassille, A M B and Schouten, W 1990 Stereotypic behavior, endogenous opioids, and postfeeding hypoalgesia in pigs. Physiology and Behavior 48: 91–96CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robbins, T W, Mittleman, G, O Brien, J and Winn, P 1990 The neuropsychological significance of stereotypy induced by stimulant drugs. In Cooper, S J and Dourish, C T (eds) Neurobiology of Stereotyped Behaviour pp 25–63. Clarendon Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Savory, C J, Seawright, E and Watson, A 1992 Stereotyped behavior in broiler breeders in relation to husbandry and opioid receptor blockade. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32: 349–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schouten, W and Rushen, J 1992 Effects of naloxone on stereotypic and normal behavior of tethered and loose-housed sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 33: 17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solleysel, J L 1696 How to know if a horse which a man intends to buy, hath a good appetite, or be subject to the TICK. In Anonymous The Marechal Parfait pp 88–90Google Scholar
Terlouw, E M C, Lawrence, A B, Ladewig, J, Depassille, A M, Rushen, J and Schouten, W G P 1991 Relationship between plasma-cortisol and stereotypic activities in pigs. Behavioural Processes 25: 133–153CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, J M, Goodman, P A, Losito, B G, Corrigan, S, Charry, J M and Bailey, WH 1981 Behavioral depression produced by an uncontrollable stressor-relationship to norepinephrine, dopamine, and serotonin levels in various regions of rat-brain. Brain Research Reviews 3: 167–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, R A 1996 Addictive drugs and brain-stimulation reward. Annual Review of Neuroscience 19: 319–340CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zanella, A J, Broom, D M, Hunter, J C and Mendl, M T 1996 Brain opioid receptors in relation to stereotypies, inactivity, and housing in sows. Physiology and Behavior 59: 769–775CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed