Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T23:28:01.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Foot disorders in dairy cattle: impact on cow and dairy farmer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

MRN Bruijnis ,
B Beerda ,
H Hogeveen  and
EN Stassen
MRN Bruijnis*
Affiliation:
Animal and Society, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands
B Beerda
Affiliation:
Adaptation Physiology Group, Behavioural Ecology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands
H Hogeveen
Affiliation:
Business Economics Group, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University, PO Box 8130, 6706 KN, Wageningen, The Netherlands Department of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, PO Box 80151, 3584 CL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
EN Stassen
Affiliation:
Animal and Society, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: Marielle.Bruijnis@wur.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper considers the economic consequences and the welfare impact of foot disorders in dairy cattle and the association between them, taking into account clinical and subclinical foot disorders. In dairy farming with cubicle housing and concrete floors, foot disorders are a major welfare problem with serious economic consequences. On average, foot disorders cost €53 per cow per year, of which indirect cost factors are the main cause. Subclinical foot disorders, which are the foot disorders not recognised by dairy farmers, account for 50% of the total welfare impact and 32% of the total costs. The consequences of foot disorders can be difficult to observe and more insight into these consequences is helpful in stimulating actions to improve dairy cow foot health. Digital dermatitis (DD), an infectious foot disorder, is the most serious foot disorder from both an economic and welfare perspective. The correlation between economics and animal welfare impact suggests that reducing the problem of foot disorders from an economic perspective will positively influence the welfare of dairy cows. Insight into economic and welfare consequences of the different foot disorders, including the association between them, can help make dairy farmers more aware and help with decision-making regarding measures to improve dairy cow foot health.

Keywords

animal welfaredairy cattleeconomicsfoot disordersmodellingwelfare impact
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 21 , Issue S1: Proceedings of the UFAW International Symposium ‘Making animal improvements: Economic and other incentives and constraints’ Historic Dockyard, Portsmouth, UK, 2011 , May 2012 , pp. 33 - 40
Copyright
© 2012 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Algers, B, Bertoni, G, Broom, DM, Hartung, J, Lidfors, L, Metz, JHM, Munksgaard, L, Nunes Pina, T, Oltenacu, T, Rehage, J, Rushen, J, Smulders, F, Stassen, EN, Stilwell, G, Waiblinger, S and Webster, AJF 2009 Scientific report on the effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease. Annex to the EFSA Journal 1143: 1–7Google Scholar
Amory, JR, Barker, ZE, Wright, JL, Mason, SA, Blowey, RW and Green, LE 2008 Associations between sole ulcer, white line disease and digital dermatitis and the milk yield of 1824 dairy cows on 30 dairy cow farms in England and Wales from February 2003-November 2004. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 83: 381–391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.09.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anonymous 2001 Scientists’ assessment of the impact on housing and management on animal welfare. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 4: 3–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327604JAWS0401_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, A, Dinare, M, Devant, M and Carre, X 2007 Associations between lameness and production, feeding and milking attendance of Holstein cows milked with an automatic milking system. Journal of Dairy Research 74: 40–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022029906002184CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, NJ, Bell, MJ, Knowles, TG, Whay, HR, Main, DJ and Webster, AJF 2009 The development, implementation and testing of a lameness control programme based on HACCP principles and designed for heifers on dairy farms. The Veterinary Journal 180: 178–188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.05.020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bicalho, RC, Vokey, F, Erb, HN and Guard, CL 2007 Visual locomotion scoring in the first seventy days in milk: impact on pregnancy and survival. Journal of Dairy Science 90: 4586–4591. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0297CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blowey, RW and Weaver, AD 2003 Color Atlas of Diseases and Disorders of Cattle, 2nd Edition. Mosby: New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
Bruijnis, MRN, Hogeveen, H and Stassen, EN 2010 Assessing economic consequences of foot disorders in dairy cattle using a dynamic stochastic simulation model. Journal of Dairy Science 93: 2419–2432. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2721CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruijnis, MRN, Beerda, B, Hogeveen, H and Stassen, EN 2011 Assessing the welfare impact of foot disorders in dairy cattle by a modelling approach. Animal. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111002606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cha, E, Hertl, JA, Bar, D and Gröhn, YT 2010 The cost of different types of lameness in dairy cows calculated by dynamic programming. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 97: 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.07.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarkson, MJ, Downham, DY, Faull, WB, Hughes, JW, Manson, FJ, Merritt, JB, Murray, RD, Russell, WB, Sutherst, JE and Ward, WR 1996 Incidence and prevalence of lameness in dairy cattle. Veterinary Record 138: 563–567. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.138.23.563CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enting, H, Kooij, D, Dijkhuizen, AA, Huirne, RBM and Noordhuizen-Stassen, EN 1997 Economic losses due to clinical lameness in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 49: 259–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(97)00051-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espejo, LA, Endres, MI and Salfer, JA 2006 Prevalence of lameness in high-producing Holstein cows housed in free-stall barns in Minnesota. Journal of Dairy Science 89: 3052–3058. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72579-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ettema, FE and ⊘stergaard, S 2006 Economic decision making on prevention and control of clinical lameness in Danish dairy herds. Livestock Science 102: 92–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. livprodsci.2005.11.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankena, K, Somers, JGCJ, Schouten, WGP, Van Stek, JV, Metz, JHM, Stassen, EN and Graat, EAM 2009 The effect of digital lesions and floor type on locomotion score in Dutch dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 88: 150–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.08.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, D, Weary, DM, Pajor, EA and Milligan, BN 1997 A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Animal Welfare 6: 187–205Google Scholar
Garbarino, EJ, Hernandez, JA, Shearer, JK, Risco, CA and Thatcher, WW 2004 Effect of lameness on ovarian activity in postpartum Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 87: 4123–4131. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73555-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holzhauer, M, Bartels, CJM, Van den Borne, BHP and Van Schaik, G 2006 Intra-class correlation attributable to claw trimmers scoring common hind-claw disorders in Dutch dairy herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 75: 47–55CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huijps, K, Lam, TJGM and Hogeveen, H 2008 Costs of mastitis: facts and perception. Journal of Dairy Research 75: 113–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022029907002932CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huijps, K, Hogeveen, H, Lam, TJGM and Huirne, RBM 2009 Preferences of cost factors for mastitis management among Dutch dairy farmers using adaptive conjoint analysis. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 92: 351–359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.08.024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
König, S, Wu, XL, Gianola, D, Heringstad, B and Simianer, H 2008 Exploration of relationships between claw disorders and milk yield in Holstein cows via recursive linear and threshold models. Journal of Dairy Science 91: 395–406. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0170CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kossaibati, MA and Esslemont, RJ 1997 The costs of production diseases in dairy herds in England. The Veterinary Journal 154: 41–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1090-0233(05)80007-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kujala, M, Dohoo, IR, Laakso, M, Schnier, C and Soveri, T 2009 Sole ulcers in Finnish dairy cattle. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 89: 227–236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.02.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leach, KA, Whay, HR, Maggs, CM, Barker, ZE, Paul, ES, Bell, AK and Main, DCJ 2010 Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness: 1. Understanding barriers to lameness control on dairy farms. Research in Veterinary Science 89: 311–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.02.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manske, T, Hultgren, J and Bergsten, C 2002 The effect of claw trimming on the hoof health of Swedish dairy cattle. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 54: 113–129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(02)00020-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ouweltjes, W, Van der Werf, JTN, Frankena, K and Van Leeuwen, JL 2011 Effects of flooring and restricted freestall access on behavior and claw health of dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 94: 705–715. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3208CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somers, JGCJ, Frankena, K, Noordhuizen-Stassen, EN and Metz, JHM 2003 Prevalence of claw disorders in Dutch dairy cows exposed to several floor systems. Journal of Dairy Science 86: 2082–2093. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73797-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tadich, N, Flor, E and Green, L 2010 Associations between hoof lesions and locomotion score in 1,098 unsound dairy cows. The Veterinary Journal 184: 60–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.01.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valeeva, NI, Lam, TJGM and Hogeveen, H 2007 Motivation of dairy farmers to improve mastitis management. Journal of Dairy Science 90: 4466–4477. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0095CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, SL, Smith, RF, Routly, JE, Jones, DN, Morris, MJ and Dobson, H 2008 Lameness, activity time budgets, and oestrus expression in dairy cattle. Journal Dairy Science 91: 4552–4559. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1048CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warnick, LD, Janssen, D, Guard, CL and Gröhn, YT 2001 The effect of lameness on milk production in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 84: 1988–1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74642-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed